clint van damme
Well-Known Member
if there was evidence to suggest it's true I might believe it, (you said suggest rather than prove). But you won't provide any anyway.
Of course you wouldn't think it is, even though the evidence suggests it is true
Let’s be honest its a tight call....
Corbyn - either terrorist sympathiser/anti semite or someone with appalling lack of judgement
Johnson - calculated liar/untrustworthy leader or just plays the political game for personal gain.
You pays your money you takes your chance. It’s impossible to defend either so for me it will come down to least worse choice.
He said that the royal family is beyond reproach. I’m not lying.He didn't defend him stop lying and trying to make out he did
he specifically said 'the institution of the monarchy' rather than 'the royal family', thoughHe said that the royal family is beyond reproach. I’m not lying.
Ah yes, it was a commemoration for 8 terrorists trying to bomb a police station.
Slight difference, but it shows who the man is just the same.
if there was evidence to suggest it's true I might believe it, (you said suggest rather than prove). But you won't provide any anyway.
Even that’s not strictly true. He was actually attending a meeting of the Wolfe Tone Society in London, a republican organisation where they do indeed pay tribute to dead republicans and apparently these 8 men were mentioned as was an innocent catholic man killed by the SAS. It wasn’t a meeting to specifically pay tribute to any of those men innocent or not, it just happens to be part of the process that the organisation goes through at meetings. Corbyn was specifically there to engage in finding a peaceful solution not to pay tribute to anyone.Ah yes, it was a commemoration for 8 terrorists trying to bomb a police station.
Slight difference, but it shows who the man is just the same.
if there was evidence to suggest it's true I might believe it, (you said suggest rather than prove). But you won't provide any anyway.
Shows what man he really is
you think a Twitter account called brexittory is proof?! Dear me!
If you want to see antisemitism, look at the anti-Semitic tropes trotted out against the Milliband family during the Labour leadership contest by the Daily Mail which you're so fond of quoting.
would you define someone as a terrorist sympathiser if - for example - they were arrested when campaigning for a terrorists rights in prison?
Oh dear.
Next someone will be saying that the Good Friday Agreement was a "Surrender treaty". Oh yeah, the biggest c**t on the forum already has!
maybe they believe that rights should be extended to everyone. In the same way you did with that Samina Begum.
That is an interesting view. Can you explain why the only two instances of Mr Corbyn showing any such concern was in the case of IRA bombers?
Then it is the Green party. Sian puts her points across very well.Or you take the option I am and realise we don’t live in a dictatorship but a parliamentary democracy and look at each party in the round.
I like to cut of your jib.Then it is the Green party. Sian puts her points across very well.
And also the best looking by far :wacky:
One look on a Facebook group tells you that some people literally believe anything they read on the internet. These people have a vote, so it does matter.I agree,but,
if there are people out there that saw a tweet from an account called 'Factcheck UK' and thought to themselves '"oh, I'd better pay particular attention to what this tweet says, as it obviously comes from an important source that I should be paying attention to, despite the fact that I've never heard of FactcheckUK before. You know what, I'll totally desreguard my currently held views and instead go with those trustworthy people at FactCheck UK instead",
then I don't think that either these peoples original views or their new found views would be worth jack shit either way.
I agree,but,
if there are people out there that saw a tweet from an account called 'Factcheck UK' and thought to themselves '"oh, I'd better pay particular attention to what this tweet says, as it obviously comes from an important source that I should be paying attention to, despite the fact that I've never heard of FactcheckUK before. You know what, I'll totally desreguard my currently held views and instead go with those trustworthy people at FactCheck UK instead",
then I don't think that either these peoples original views or their new found views would be worth jack shit either way.
No he didn’t.he specifically said 'the institution of the monarchy' rather than 'the royal family', though
I don't even know which case you're on about.
Was he trying to break one of them out?If he’d been successful in getting one of their murderers free from prison, who knows, he might have been the cause of More innocent people being killed.
You ok with a potential PM having the links he did with the IRA?
Was he trying to break one of them out?
Was he trying to break one of them out?
Then it is the Green party. Sian puts her points across very well.
And also the best looking by far :wacky:
Google Image Result for https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Si%C3%A2n_Berry%2C_2018_%28cropped%29.jpg
And good that Labour has a leader joined with two others with so many skeletons in the closet?
It is as though some are happy to have Corbyn as leader. But they never explain why an idiot like Boris has a big lead over Corbyn. If it isn't Corbyn holding us back what is it? It isn't Brexit if some on here are to be believed as the majority are supposed to be in favour of remaining. It isn't on policies as Boris has hardly any. And most don't believe those he does have.
But yeah let's just happy clap him to another defeat and call it a victory again if he doesn't lose by a distance.
There was a Tory candidate in Aberdeen suspended yesterday that got little attention. Still, he was only suspended over antisemitism, islamaphobia and homophobia so hardly worth a mention.Then it is the Green party. Sian puts her points across very well.
And also the best looking by far :wacky:
Google Image Result for https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Si%C3%A2n_Berry%2C_2018_%28cropped%29.jpg
erm, he did. I don't like him either, but that's what he said. Take a look at the video clips - lots around the internet.No he didn’t.
I am on about firstly clear and to my knowledge not denied links with the Balcombe Gang and in particular Hugh Doherty a charming individual who was given 11 life sentences for his involvement with at least 16 murders and 50 bombings. Corbyn was a frequent campaigner for Mr Doherty and believed his rights were denied as he was not having appropriate visiting conditions and should be in a prison near his home. I would ask you is this showing sympathy for Mr Doherty?
Patrick Magee - A lovely chap who murdered five people at the Tory party conference including MP Sir Anthony Berry -- Jeremy Corbyn was part of a protest at the Old Bailey Trial campaigning for "Irish Solidarity" with a notorious fringe group and was cautioned over obstructive behaviour. In your opinion was he showing sympathy for Mr Mcgee
He and McDonnell were at a wedding of a Guildford 4 bomber in prison - I do not think this is denied - and even though the conviction was eventually quashed he attended at the time in the full knowledge this person was convicted for murder - is attending a wedding of a convicted murderer showing sympathy
What I would do is substitute all of the words Corbyn and put in Johnson and IRA and put in Britain First and ask yourself if you would apply the same arguments?
The most abhorrent thing of course was inviting his murdering chums to parliament after the Brighton bombing.
Night Jeremy Corbyn stood in honour of dead IRA terrorists
Do you think this response was symapthetic to the cause as minuted in Hansard?
That was the question yes. But as usual per Boris the answer didn’t exactly correspond with the question. He actually end up saying to opposing things during the course of discussion about the royal family and specifically Prince Andrew. He had a complete change of tact once he gauged the response from Corbyn talking about the victims. Opening with they’re beyond reproach to ending with no one is above the law.erm, he did. I don't like him either, but that's what he said. Take a look at the video clips - lots around the internet.
Hmm, got a link? They're not doing very well in the Aberdeen area!There was a Tory candidate in Aberdeen suspended yesterday that got little attention. Still, he was only suspended over antisemitism, islamaphobia and homophobia so hardly worth a mention.
Hmm, got a link? They're not doing very well in the Aberdeen area!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?