I would like to answer you but have answered this several times before.It does. And I keep repeating myself but it falls on deaf ears with you. Usually because you want to start arguments with people trying to agree with you. Complete waste of time.
Oh dear
Has Johnson got his NI numbers confused?
and the award for the Diane Abbott of the Conservative Party goes to ...
...drumroll...
... the Conservatives Party leader, Boris Johnson!...
...rapturous applause.
So after reading this would you vote for someone that won't state what they will do?There's nothing wrong with wanting to know what one would be voting for. Labour's policy is not a binary option and is predicated on the notion that it will renegotiate with the EU and offer a second referendum. If the British people dislike that deal, then we will be out.
What is unclear about the policy? If voters want a binary choice, then by all means I would suggest that they vote for a different party which has a binary stance such as the Lib Dems or Conservatives, but to suggest that it is not a clear policy would be to misinterpret the rules of the English language.
I'm not convinced this is true, as Corbyn himself has long been a Eurosceptic. Sure, a large proportion of the rank and file will be Remainers but this does not translate to a Remain policy - or else they would have committed to it. Why would they risk losing votes to the Lib Dems/other progressives when they could easily posit themselves as the only realistic hope of a benign Brexit/no Brexit at all?
I would like to answer you but have answered this several times before.
I would like to answer you but have answered this several times before.OK boomer
I'm saying that if you want to vote for a Party that has a binary stance on the question of Brexit, don't vote for Labour. But to suggest that a party isn't stating 'what it will do' just because they have a rather more complex policy is a bit fallacious.So after reading this would you vote for someone that won't state what they will do?
And there is the problem.
Almost forgot about the bridge.Almost makes his bridge at Stranraer look like a bargain. Almost.
I am a Labour voter. I always vote Labour. But I want my X to go to remain.I'm saying that if you want to vote for a Party that has a binary stance on the question of Brexit, don't vote for Labour. But to suggest that a party isn't stating 'what it will do' just because they have a rather more complex policy is a bit fallacious.
Ask why he thinks horses love horse racing. He’ll block you and all your problems will be over.OK boomer
Almost forgot about the bridge.
Ask why he thinks horses love horse racing. He’ll block you and all your problems will be over.
I am a Labour voter. I always vote Labour. But I want my X to go to remain.
So why shouldn't I know what I am voting for?
Don’t they need to make the new technology before build the bridge? Something to do with the pylons needing to be the deepest and longest ever built.Pointless bridge- £15 billion
An extra £85 a year-£11 billion
HS2-£56 billion according to latest government estimates
Alienating Northern Ireland and giving more hope for Scottish independence? Priceless.
Don’t they need to make the new technology before build the bridge? Something to do with the pylons needing to be the deepest and longest ever built.
He actually said "the institution of the monarchy is beyond reproach"The Daily Mail going with the headline that Boris refused to back Prince Andrew. Obviously missed the bit where he said he was above criticism.
They weren't asked about Prince Andrew. They were asked about the Royal FamilyHe didn't defend him stop lying and trying to make out he did
That was the question, not his answerHe actually said "the institution of the monarchy is beyond reproach"
The question was about the Royal Family...not specifically Prince Andrew.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Johnson says monarchy 'beyond reproach'No he didn’t.
...As is true of almost any party in a mature democracy.Labour have a complex voter base to consider, and as such have always had to try and find a position that could unite two disprite positions.
Rated by who? NHS staff? Woman's Weekly? US Pharma?NHS now rated the number one concern of voters overtaking Brexit.
Watch the whole thing and how his face immediately drops when Corbyn says that before we talk about Prince Andrew let’s think of the victims and the reaction it got from the audience. That was the realisation of a man who’d just said that the royal were beyond reproach when in fact they aren’t.Johnson says monarchy 'beyond reproach'
Click on the video...10-15s in.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Johnson says monarchy 'beyond reproach'
Click on the video...10-15s in.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
So Corbyn made it specific AFTER Boris gave his answer. Not sure what you heard. It sounded pretty clear to meWatch the whole thing and how his face immediately drops when Corbyn says that before we talk about Prince Andrew let’s think of the victims and the reaction it got from the audience. That was the realisation of a man who’d just said that the royal were beyond reproach when in fact they aren’t.
I always said when the Queen finally goes then this would be time to ask ourselves if we still need a hereditary Head of State.
Have always been a fan of turning ourselves into a Republic.
You mean he is a monarchist? And you aren't.A nose that couldn't be further up royal arse if it tried
It’s all over the news. I’ve even provided links in a later post. I can’t help you if you don’t want to read what’s put in front of you.Rated by who? NHS staff? Woman's Weekly? US Pharma?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Well I just checked the 'Election Extra' section on the BBC news site - It definitely isn't all over thatIt’s all over the news. I’ve even provided links in a later post. I can’t help you if you don’t want to read what’s put in front of you.
I actually think that when people see the institution of the Royals in action and the hereditary power being handed to Charles it could actually cause a few to start asking questions.I think there is common understanding that Australia is only hanging around from being a Republic for this reason.
It’s the latest poll from MORI. The BBC are clearly waiting for Cummings to give Kuenessberg permission to report on it. Interestingly the shift has come in the last week, the previous week the same pollsters had Brexit as the No 1 concern for voters.Well I just checked the 'Election Extra' section on the BBC news site - It definitely isn't all over that
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?