Hence his lacklustre performance in the campaign.
Well if you really believe that he is not a leader of anything is he? He either stands by the courage of his convictions or he passionately backs the party line. He doesn't just lie down and hope it all goes away
He simply isn't a leader. He is incapable of leadership. You have pretty much acknowledged that.
Well if you really believe that he is not a leader of anything is he? He either stands by the courage of his convictions or he passionately backs the party line. He doesn't just lie down and hope it all goes away
He simply isn't a leader. He is incapable of leadership. You have pretty much acknowledged that.
I agree that he isn't a leader, but he is still morally above the tories. But that doesn't count in the real world,
It's actually about time all politicians become honest about the NHS and admit a completely public funded organisation is impossible to sustain.
Both parties prop it up and neither are honest enough to admit a state funded system for all is utopia
It's pathetic that no one will admit this and work to alternate solutions.
Well if you believe a moral person openly supports terrorist thugs who drag innocent women from their beds in front of their screaming children as they are informers and blows their brains across an empty Irish beach then yes by your definition he clearly is
that's true. But then again May was pro Europe but changed her tune, (well kept quiet and slipped in under the radar while everyone else was stabbing each other in the back), to take control of the tories.Like Mr Corbyn and Europe you mean?
It's not impossible at all, it just requeries the will to make it work.
It's actually about time all politicians become honest about the NHS and admit a completely public funded organisation is impossible to sustain.
Both parties prop it up and neither are honest enough to admit a state funded system for all is utopia
It's pathetic that no one will admit this and work to alternate solutions.
So didn't stick to his principals then?
Well if you believe a moral person openly supports terrorist thugs who drag innocent women from their beds in front of their screaming children as they are informers and blows their brains across an empty Irish beach then yes by your definition he clearly is
So whats the answer? Have the eldery put down? Refuse them treatment? Get them to pay via medical insurance (which they can't because they don't work)?Yes it's utterly and completely impossible with an increased aged population and the fact it's long long gone adrift of its initial intent.
a moral person wouldn't go within a mile of the Saudi regime either.
Yes it's utterly and completely impossible with an increased aged population and the fact it's long long gone adrift of its initial intent.
You're right and I agree.
However, it's his ideas and policies that stop him getting support.
The "we'll do this, and we'll do that" is easily dismantled with the question; "Where's that money coming from?"
Isn't it half and half? So about half let a private company do it like at the Ricoh and tesco for example and others do it themselves. Even staff have to pay for their own parking.
So people end up voting against policies they support in favour of ones that will fuck them over.
You keep making this point, you fail to point out that popular opinion supports many other things: capital punishment, stopping migration, tougher benefit sanctions, longer prison sentences, stopping foreign aid. All totally at odds with what the Labour party are offering.
People don't think in terms of left and right in the real world, people like you and the current Labour party do.
That loss is covered by a tax on private healthcare.Oh okay. Basically my point was, labour want to scrap car parking charges, which is great for patients and families etc.
But the massive revenue loss to an under pressure NHS, not a good idea really is it?
What data are you basing that on? In any case they aren't Conservative policies either.capital punishment, stopping migration, tougher benefit sanctions, longer prison sentences, stopping foreign aid. All totally at odds with what the Labour party are offering.
There are women in Saudi Arabia who no longer wear a head!You're missing the point, she didn't wear a headscarf. That shows true leadership qualities.
What data are you basing that on? In any case they aren't Conservative policies either.
Oh okay. Basically my point was, labour want to scrap car parking charges, which is great for patients and families etc.
But the massive revenue loss to an under pressure NHS, not a good idea really is it?
Well true but the money would be found a different way but it's whether you believe labour in their sums and then their methods to achieve this. I personally don't. As you say it sounds great for us patients and families to get free parking at nhs hospitals but then when your tax goes up in other areas it might not look so great.
I think Corbyn will be gone after June 8th personally and then maybe they can start to have a real sit down and come together to plan for the next general election. Corbyns biggest problem is his own mps and party have turned against him ages ago with failed coups and second leadership elections. How are voters meant to believe him when his own party in large sections don't. Call May what you will and she has faults but the mps back her and the party manifesto. The time to judge is whether she delivers on them? As let's face she is going to win by a landslide.
Can she deliver crap policies and vague platitudes? 'Hell yes' she can. It's not like they have form for missing targets and breaking manifesto commitments, this is the perfect party led by Mrs Perfect.
It has not yet been published (or leaked).What is the Conservative manifesto? Some vague platitudes and uncosted promises
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
I'd quite happily pay more tax for better services, more investment in society, and allowing for us to preserve and build on our culture and heritage...when your tax goes up in other areas it might not look so great.
Time for euthanasia then?Yes it's utterly and completely impossible with an increased aged population and the fact it's long long gone adrift of its initial intent.
Oh I quite agree and that's why I said in 5 years you can vote against them again if you're not happy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?