Goal or no goal (1 Viewer)

[Johhny Blue]

This is an interesting concept and i wonder if i drove a Russian tank to the Polish border and crossed half way over so the gun was in Poland but not the back end, would N.A.T.O take that as an invasion of Poland or not.

Depends. Would your tank driver’s licence be Russian or Polish?

 

---

[EalingSB]

It would save a lot of discussion/anger/debate etc. if the EFL put out all GLT decisions out on official social media channels as soon as they happen. They’ve nothing to hide - the technology is excellent and rarely fails. If it does, they are better off admitting it and trying to make sure it doesn’t happen again. You simply cannot tell from the iFollow grabs.

 

[Johhny Blue]

I don't know about anyone else but for me that was a definite goal.

View attachment 24184

You’ll see the light eventually

 

[Bugsy]

Ah yes cuz this angle is so much better than the technology or angle from side on where it clearly isn’t full ball over the line. How are we this far in and people still not accepting it didn’t go in?! People really do believe what they want to believe.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

it was a joke kneeleftmabbuttsgary lighten up. have u seen the still I produced.......PUSB

 

[MusicDating]

it was a joke kneeleftmabbuttsgary lighten up. have u seen the still I produced.......PUSB

It needed more grain

 

[GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee]

it was a joke kneeleftmabbuttsgary lighten up. have u seen the still I produced.......PUSB

Very much enjoyed the name rinse


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[COVKIDSNEVERQUIT]

I've never really been in an argument with David O'Day before and think people take it too far with the stuff they say about him, but maybe I was wrong. Lunatic.

Wow etc

Hello, hello, Hill's is back, hello hello.

 

[steve cooper]

The ball is in the air there which is why you can see clear daylight underneath it but still not entirely over the line.

I would say the ball is on the ground and is over the line.

 

[steve cooper]

Clearer picture. The trouble is, to state the obvious, the ball is round so in the absence of using a tee square to check the centre of the ball with the goal line, in my view it's a clear goal.

 

[rhino1002]

Clearer picture. The trouble is, to state the obvious, the ball is round so in the absence of using a tee square to check the centre of the ball with the goal line, in my view it's a clear goal.
View attachment 24191

If you use that photo you are assuming the ball is on the ground and i suspect it is off the the ground at the time of capture which isn't giving you the true picture

 

[skybluesam66]

If you use that photo you are assuming the ball is on the ground and i suspect it is off the the ground at the time of capture which isn't giving you the true picture

the ball was on the ground (could see from tv) the issue is the overhang of the part of the ball not on the ground, where around 1cm overhung the virtual line (not necessarily the actual line)

 

[rhino1002]

the ball was on the ground (could see from tv) the issue is the overhang of the part of the ball not on the ground, where around 1cm overhung the virtual line (not necessarily the actual line)

that doesn't mean that photo shown earlier in this thread had the ball on the ground, big assumptions are being made about a still photo from an acute angle i have seen the photo from the goal line technology which showed the ball didn't fully cross the line albeit by millimetres. Unless the technology is wrong then it didn't cross the line

 

[robbiethemole]

Seen from above which is where the Hawkeye is, there is overlap of the ball on the line so no goal. They were still cheating fuckers tho and don’t get me started on the fucking ref

 

[thekidfromstrettoncamp]

Something difference the player in the net is interfering with play. I know he cannot help it at first but he clearly puts his head back to prevent it going any further into the net . if a player standing on the sideline knocks the ball ball back into play it is deemed to have crossed the line and a throw in is given. Where is the difference?

 

[Liquid Gold]

It wasn't over the line you absolute fucking nutcases

 

[Earlsdon_Skyblue1]

It wasn't over the line you absolute fucking nutcases

 

[MalcSB]

that doesn't mean that photo shown earlier in this thread had the ball on the ground, big assumptions are being made about a still photo from an acute angle i have seen the photo from the goal line technology which showed the ball didn't fully cross the line albeit by millimetres. Unless the technology is wrong then it didn't cross the line

Have you seen the actual photo used by Hawkeye, not the mock up shown on Quest?

 

[MalcSB]

Seen from above which is where the Hawkeye is, there is overlap of the ball on the line so no goal. They were still cheating fuckers tho and don’t get me started on the fucking ref

Have you seen the actual photo used by Hawkeye, not the mock up shown on Quest?

 

[Greggs]

Has anyone seen the actual photo used by Hawkeye, not the mock up shown on Quest?

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

Why wasn't it shown on the big screen In the ground at the time? When they showed every other save or near miss in the game.

They’re advised to not show contentious decisions

 

[shmmeee]

Why is this thread still going?

 

[Otis]

Why is this thread still going?

Because we are trying to work out whether the ball was over the line or not.

 

[MalcSB]

Has anyone seen the actual photo used by Hawkeye, not the mock up shown on Quest?

There’s an echo in here. However, on the extended highlights it shows what is described as the goal decision point, which is just before the defender clears the ball. That is too late in the incident, I would like to see where the ball was when it hit the grounded defenders back.

We were abysmal, however 3 penalty shouts and a potential goal not given did contribute to the outcome.

 

[shmmeee]

There’s an echo in here. However, on the extended highlights it shows what is described as the goal decision point, which is just before the defender clears the ball. That is too late in the incident, I would like to see where the ball was when it hit the grounded defenders back.

We were abysmal, however 3 penalty shouts and a potential goal not given did contribute to the outcome.

What they showed on Quest was the Hawkeye image. That’s the furthest it was over the line. It wasn’t in. JFC.

 

[Adge]

Because we are trying to work out whether the ball was over the line or not.

Why? When we all know it wasn’t.
Some people on here last night have made themselves look like right tits!

 

[hill83]

Hello, hello, Hill's is back, hello hello.

Wow

 

[hill83]

It wasn't over the line you absolute fucking nutcases

Wow

 

[Moff]

Why is this thread still going?

Because there's still time 24 hours later to get an equaliser?

 

[Adge]

Because there's still time 24 hours later to get an equaliser?

But we all know that if we were playing till next week we still won’t score!

 

[wingy]

Last night's result was just a bit of trolling SU.

 

[CDK]

Thought there was ball technology.

 

[Johhny Blue]

Clearer picture. The trouble is, to state the obvious, the ball is round so in the absence of using a tee square to check the centre of the ball with the goal line, in my view it's a clear goal.
View attachment 24191

It would have counted if the earth was flat.
Maybe that explains some of the conspiracy theorists that are afraid to change their minds. (The earth is round by the way)

 

[Johhny Blue]

Why is this thread still going?

Because it’s the only thing worth discussing in the whole 90 minutes

 

[hill83]

It’s essentially a version of this

 

[Liquid Gold]

Wow