Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
Ad
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Good intentions - poorly executed.... (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter shepardo01
  • Start date Nov 8, 2024
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
shepardo01

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #1
So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sad
Reactions: Badge72, Dhinsa's_Millions, brizzle and 15 others
alexccfc99

alexccfc99

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #2
For me I’d hope any new manager is given the chance to bring their own people in
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwistAndShoutCCFC1987
shepardo01

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #3
alexccfc99 said:
For me I’d hope any new manager is given the chance to bring their own people in
Click to expand...
Doesn't sound like they'll be given the chance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Otis
Ccfcisparks

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #4
Dr Claire Marie Roberts OUT
 
  • Like
Reactions: regis...4-3!! and shmmeee
P

Pusb1

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #5
they won’t pay off the coaching staff’s salaries. Therefore they’ll need to stay
 
Darth Robins

Darth Robins

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #6
I've no doubt the usual suspects will dismiss all of this because Robins never said any of it in a press conference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dhinsa's_Millions, chiefdave, Otis and 5 others
alexccfc99

alexccfc99

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #7
shepardo01 said:
Doesn't sound like they'll be given the chance.
Click to expand...
Well then that narrows down your options and does give legs to someone like Sheehan or Bloomfield if true

Would rule Lampard out as he takes Jody Morris and Joe Edwards everywhere with him
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #8
shepardo01 said:
So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.
Click to expand...

Youre wrong mate.
Nicks got a quote from the Telegraph to prove it.
And stop having a go at the performance director , bloody sexist!!
 
Reactions: Dhinsa's_Millions, Skybluecol, Otis and 2 others

Great_Expectations

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #9
If the above is true (which there’s no reason to doubt) it’s a poisoned chalice for whoever gets the role.

Good times ahead.
 

eastwoodsdustman

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #10
It does fit with Robins not being happy for the last 2 months.
 
Reactions: Otis, HadjiChippo, Saddlebrains and 1 other person

ProfessorbyGrace

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #11
shepardo01 said:
So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.
Click to expand...
Thanks for sharing, mate.

As for the performance director, I’m sure (as a standard policy) will have to undergo a performance review. That would make interesting viewing.

As for Mr Carr, I’ve only seen bits and pieces of him to gauge his character, but the official pre-match interview with him and Bidwell was quite revealing.
 
R

robbiethemole

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #12
shepardo01 said:
So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.
Click to expand...
so we were right about the ipad wankers all along then???
 
Reactions: Dhinsa's_Millions, oscillatewildly, Briles and 7 others

usskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #13
It was the Performance Director that called Chris Ramsey and told him that DK said the timing wasn’t right for an Assistant Manager. That was on October 9th. It sounded weird that he’d be called in to meet with MR, leave thinking all he had to do was agree on a package.. only to get that call.
 
Reactions: Covcraig@bury, clint van damme and Domo

ProfessorbyGrace

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #14
robbiethemole said:
so we were right about the ipad wankers all along then???
Click to expand...
Seems that way, if the source is relaying 100% accurate info. No reason to doubt it, really, as overall it seems very plausible.
 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #15
clint van damme said:
Youre wrong mate.
Nicks got a quote from the Telegraph to prove it.
And stop having a go at the performance director tired, bloody sexist!!
Click to expand...
I'm definitely not a sexist and tried to remove any pointing towards that by purely using title and they/theirs etc.
Robins isn't going to come out and say they aren't his appointments are they.

Just passing on what I was told in a conversation today. Source is pretty damn good too.
 
Reactions: Covcraig@bury, Otis, RegTheDonk and 3 others

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #16
shepardo01 said:
So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.
Click to expand...


Dead on
 
Reactions: Dhinsa's_Millions, Moff, Otis and 2 others

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #17
Great_Expectations said:
If the above is true (which there’s no reason to doubt) it’s a poisoned chalice for whoever gets the role.

Good times ahead.
Click to expand...

It's clearly true.
You just have to join the dots of everything that's gone on in the last year.
Some of us have been saying it but getting shot down. But it's so blindingly obvious.
 
Reactions: Dhinsa's_Millions, Great_Expectations, Ring Of Steel and 1 other person

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #18
Ccfcisparks said:
Dr Claire Marie Roberts OUT
Click to expand...

Or get her in the kitchen where she belongs
 
Reactions: olderskyblue

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #19
shepardo01 said:
I'm definitely not a sexist and tried to remove any pointing towards that by purely using title and they/theirs etc.
Robins isn't going to come out and say they aren't his appointments are they.

Just passing on what I was told in a conversation today. Source is pretty damn good too.
Click to expand...

I know mate, was just been sarcastic. It's what gets levelled at anyone who questions or criticises her.
 
Reactions: LastChance and shepardo01
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #20
If that’s the case - it’s exactly as thought. robins has been managed out. I’d expect a new appointment in the mould they want to get an assistant manager, and is likely to get more things his way.
 
Reactions: ProfessorbyGrace

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #21
clint van damme said:
It's clearly true.
You just have to join the dots of everything that's gone on in the last year.
Some of us have been saying it but getting shot down. But it's so blindingly obvious.
Click to expand...

it’s still baffling how dense the Robins Out mob were, that they thought it was just the case that his “times up”
 
Reactions: AOM, chiefdave, torchomatic and 3 others
R

robbiethemole

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #22
constructive dismissal?? tribunal time for King to face up to.
How can these fuckers have screwed up so badly, so quickly, 8 years of work and progress gone out of the window in 2 fucking days.
I'm fuming at this shitshow
 
Reactions: MacReady, Tile Hill Phil, Dhinsa's_Millions and 8 others
D

Deity

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #23
I can believe a lot of that except there not being a head coach lined up …..
 
Reactions: nicksar
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #24
Deity said:
I can believe a lot of that except there not being a head coach lined up …..
Click to expand...
There won’t be one lined up - but they’ll have a shortlist that was prepared weeks ago
 
D

Deity

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #25
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
There won’t be one lined up - but they’ll have a shortlist that was prepared weeks ago
Click to expand...
My best guess is that who ever is on that short list will have been sounded out already, probably via their agent.
 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #26
Who would want to follow MR, especially after this backlash and with the possibility of not being able to bring in their own staff.
Stinks of a Bloomfield type appointment.
 
Reactions: Mr Meaners, Dhinsa's_Millions, ratovan2 and 2 others
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #27
shepardo01 said:
Who would want to follow MR, especially after this backlash and with the possibility of not being able to bring in their own staff.
Stinks of a Bloomfield type appointment.
Click to expand...
There will be an assistant. If what you’ve said is true king decided a while back he wanted Robins gone.

its a shame Robins couldn’t adapt. If he’s not a coach as you’ve then his role was untenable, given his game management isn’t the best
 
Reactions: Flying Fokker, shmmeee, chiefdave and 1 other person

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #28
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
There will be an assistant. If what you’ve said is true king decided a while back he wanted Robins gone.

its a shame Robins couldn’t adapt. If he’s not a coach as you’ve then his role was untenable, given his game management isn’t the best
Click to expand...

Couldn't adapt?! Christ, have you read his post?

If its correct, and I have no reason to believe it isn't then he was landed with a team of sub standard coaches after his most experience coach was removed.

How are you supposed to adapt to that.
 
Reactions: ccfcchris, Dhinsa's_Millions, brizzle and 9 others

ccfcchris

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #29
shepardo01 said:
So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.
Click to expand...
If all this is true and I'm not saying it isn't God help us. We're in for a very bleak future.
I didn't think I could feel any emptier after MR's sacking but I am.
 
Reactions: SkyBlueMatt, Covcraig@bury, ratovan2 and 3 others

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #30
ProfessorbyGrace said:
Thanks for sharing, mate.

As for the performance director, I’m sure (as a standard policy) will have to undergo a performance review. That would make interesting viewing.

As for Mr Carr, I’ve only seen bits and pieces of him to gauge his character, but the official pre-match interview with him and Bidwell was quite revealing.
Click to expand...
What did it reveal? I heard “blah blah blah”
 
Reactions: djr8369

Chris1987

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #31
If this is true then the club are in deep shit.
 
Reactions: Covcraig@bury and Saddlebrains

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #32
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
There won’t be one lined up - but they’ll have a shortlist that was prepared weeks ago
Click to expand...
You'd have to be fucking mental to come here and work within King's current set up.

If a new manager/head coach doesn't bring his own assistant and coaching staff he's not going to succeed.

We need a strong character that can tell King to keep his fucking nose out of the playing side of things and to get rid of all the fucking box tickers.
 
Reactions: Peter Billing, regis...4-3!!, RossB7 and 4 others
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #33
clint van damme said:
Couldn't adapt?! Christ, have you read his post?

If its correct, and I have no reason to believe it isn't then he was landed with a team of sub standard coaches after his most experience coach was removed.

How are you supposed to adapt to that.
Click to expand...
The role is changing to head coach. The job is to manage the coaches, the guy said “Robins isn’t a coach” that would suggest the coaches didn’t have direction.

you’re correct - the deck has been loaded against him if it’s true. It’s been said on here Robins agreed with the Vivaesh removal, and he was in on the recruitment of these coaches.

Look I’m gonna clarify here, I’ve complained about how I felt robins was lacking, but I’ve never openly wanted him sacked. In fact I thought he’d turned it around in all honesty (despite not thinking he could)
 
Reactions: SBAndy and covcity4life
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #34
fatso said:
You'd have to be fucking mental to come here and work within King's current set up.

If a new manager/head coach doesn't bring his own assistant and coaching staff he's not going to succeed.

We need a strong character that can tell King to keep his fucking nose out of the playing side of things and to get rid of all the fucking box tickers.
Click to expand...
We were looking for an assistant manager not long ago, the new man will bring in an assistant.

we need someone who’s tactically astute.
 
Reactions: covcity4life
D

Deity

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • #35
shepardo01 said:
Who would want to follow MR, especially after this backlash and with the possibility of not being able to bring in their own staff.
Stinks of a Bloomfield type appointment.
Click to expand...
You are joking right?

They will be forming a long queue

really well invested squad

27,000 fans for home matches

brand new training facilities

ambitious owner

Any manager worth there salt will fancy their ability to harness all that potential ….
 
Reactions: quinn1971
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?