Good intentions - poorly executed.... (4 Viewers)

[shepardo01]

So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.

 

---

[alexccfc99]

For me I’d hope any new manager is given the chance to bring their own people in

 

[shepardo01]

For me I’d hope any new manager is given the chance to bring their own people in

Doesn't sound like they'll be given the chance.

 

[Ccfcisparks]

Dr Claire Marie Roberts OUT

 

[Pusb1]

they won’t pay off the coaching staff’s salaries. Therefore they’ll need to stay

 

[Darth Robins]

I've no doubt the usual suspects will dismiss all of this because Robins never said any of it in a press conference.

 

[alexccfc99]

Doesn't sound like they'll be given the chance.

Well then that narrows down your options and does give legs to someone like Sheehan or Bloomfield if true

Would rule Lampard out as he takes Jody Morris and Joe Edwards everywhere with him

 

[clint van damme]

So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.

Youre wrong mate.
Nicks got a quote from the Telegraph to prove it.
And stop having a go at the performance director , bloody sexist!!

 

[Great_Expectations]

If the above is true (which there’s no reason to doubt) it’s a poisoned chalice for whoever gets the role.

Good times ahead.

 

[eastwoodsdustman]

It does fit with Robins not being happy for the last 2 months.

 

[ProfessorbyGrace]

So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.

Thanks for sharing, mate.

As for the performance director, I’m sure (as a standard policy) will have to undergo a performance review. That would make interesting viewing.

As for Mr Carr, I’ve only seen bits and pieces of him to gauge his character, but the official pre-match interview with him and Bidwell was quite revealing.

 

[robbiethemole]

So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.

so we were right about the ipad wankers all along then???

 

[usskyblue]

It was the Performance Director that called Chris Ramsey and told him that DK said the timing wasn’t right for an Assistant Manager. That was on October 9th. It sounded weird that he’d be called in to meet with MR, leave thinking all he had to do was agree on a package.. only to get that call.

 

[ProfessorbyGrace]

so we were right about the ipad wankers all along then???

Seems that way, if the source is relaying 100% accurate info. No reason to doubt it, really, as overall it seems very plausible.

 

[shepardo01]

Youre wrong mate.
Nicks got a quote from the Telegraph to prove it.
And stop having a go at the performance director tired, bloody sexist!!

I'm definitely not a sexist and tried to remove any pointing towards that by purely using title and they/theirs etc.
Robins isn't going to come out and say they aren't his appointments are they.

Just passing on what I was told in a conversation today. Source is pretty damn good too.

 

[Saddlebrains]

So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.

Dead on

 

[clint van damme]

If the above is true (which there’s no reason to doubt) it’s a poisoned chalice for whoever gets the role.

Good times ahead.

It's clearly true.
You just have to join the dots of everything that's gone on in the last year.
Some of us have been saying it but getting shot down. But it's so blindingly obvious.

 

[Grendel]

Dr Claire Marie Roberts OUT

Or get her in the kitchen where she belongs

 

[clint van damme]

I'm definitely not a sexist and tried to remove any pointing towards that by purely using title and they/theirs etc.
Robins isn't going to come out and say they aren't his appointments are they.

Just passing on what I was told in a conversation today. Source is pretty damn good too.

I know mate, was just been sarcastic. It's what gets levelled at anyone who questions or criticises her.

 

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

If that’s the case - it’s exactly as thought. robins has been managed out. I’d expect a new appointment in the mould they want to get an assistant manager, and is likely to get more things his way.

 

[Ring Of Steel]

It's clearly true.
You just have to join the dots of everything that's gone on in the last year.
Some of us have been saying it but getting shot down. But it's so blindingly obvious.

it’s still baffling how dense the Robins Out mob were, that they thought it was just the case that his “times up”

 

[robbiethemole]

constructive dismissal?? tribunal time for King to face up to.
How can these fuckers have screwed up so badly, so quickly, 8 years of work and progress gone out of the window in 2 fucking days.
I'm fuming at this shitshow

 

[Deity]

I can believe a lot of that except there not being a head coach lined up …..

 

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

I can believe a lot of that except there not being a head coach lined up …..

There won’t be one lined up - but they’ll have a shortlist that was prepared weeks ago

 

[Deity]

There won’t be one lined up - but they’ll have a shortlist that was prepared weeks ago

My best guess is that who ever is on that short list will have been sounded out already, probably via their agent.

 

[shepardo01]

Who would want to follow MR, especially after this backlash and with the possibility of not being able to bring in their own staff.
Stinks of a Bloomfield type appointment.

 

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

Who would want to follow MR, especially after this backlash and with the possibility of not being able to bring in their own staff.
Stinks of a Bloomfield type appointment.

There will be an assistant. If what you’ve said is true king decided a while back he wanted Robins gone.

its a shame Robins couldn’t adapt. If he’s not a coach as you’ve then his role was untenable, given his game management isn’t the best

 

[clint van damme]

There will be an assistant. If what you’ve said is true king decided a while back he wanted Robins gone.

its a shame Robins couldn’t adapt. If he’s not a coach as you’ve then his role was untenable, given his game management isn’t the best

Couldn't adapt?! Christ, have you read his post?

If its correct, and I have no reason to believe it isn't then he was landed with a team of sub standard coaches after his most experience coach was removed.

How are you supposed to adapt to that.

 

[ccfcchris]

So, quite a well connected conversation I had today was quite interesting - and also as a huge fan, left me a little bit deflated.

The title refers to the new structures on the footballing side of the club.

In line with the vastly improved training facilities, the new structure of performance director and multiple coaches seemed (seems) like a decent idea and has the potential to take us to the next level - and seems to be a modern way forward.....

However, what I have heard today is why I have added the second part of the title.

Apparently;
Coaching/tactical nous is levels below what was previously in place. To the point where MR was even having to chip in with training ground coaching. He is not a coach.
Performance director is trying to "run the show".
Lead coach is their appointment - not MRs and is the biggest yes man going. Do not rule out him getting the Head Coach role. (Speculation from conversation - not info like other bits)
There are too many voices giving lower level of instruction.
AV departure was due to some new players throwing him under the bus and his poor relationship with the performance director.
He was the main man coaching wise.

So on paper, what could have been a positive move forwards has been a bit of a car crash with average coaches being employed by what sounds like a performance director who wants their own people in alongside long standing coaches and now the manager being sacrificed to facilitate this.

There is nobody already lined up to come in.

If all this is true and I'm not saying it isn't God help us. We're in for a very bleak future.
I didn't think I could feel any emptier after MR's sacking but I am.

 

[Johhny Blue]

Thanks for sharing, mate.

As for the performance director, I’m sure (as a standard policy) will have to undergo a performance review. That would make interesting viewing.

As for Mr Carr, I’ve only seen bits and pieces of him to gauge his character, but the official pre-match interview with him and Bidwell was quite revealing.

What did it reveal? I heard “blah blah blah”

 

[Chris1987]

If this is true then the club are in deep shit.

 

[fatso]

There won’t be one lined up - but they’ll have a shortlist that was prepared weeks ago

You'd have to be fucking mental to come here and work within King's current set up.

If a new manager/head coach doesn't bring his own assistant and coaching staff he's not going to succeed.

We need a strong character that can tell King to keep his fucking nose out of the playing side of things and to get rid of all the fucking box tickers.

 

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

Couldn't adapt?! Christ, have you read his post?

If its correct, and I have no reason to believe it isn't then he was landed with a team of sub standard coaches after his most experience coach was removed.

How are you supposed to adapt to that.

The role is changing to head coach. The job is to manage the coaches, the guy said “Robins isn’t a coach” that would suggest the coaches didn’t have direction.

you’re correct - the deck has been loaded against him if it’s true. It’s been said on here Robins agreed with the Vivaesh removal, and he was in on the recruitment of these coaches.

Look I’m gonna clarify here, I’ve complained about how I felt robins was lacking, but I’ve never openly wanted him sacked. In fact I thought he’d turned it around in all honesty (despite not thinking he could)

 

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

You'd have to be fucking mental to come here and work within King's current set up.

If a new manager/head coach doesn't bring his own assistant and coaching staff he's not going to succeed.

We need a strong character that can tell King to keep his fucking nose out of the playing side of things and to get rid of all the fucking box tickers.

We were looking for an assistant manager not long ago, the new man will bring in an assistant.

we need someone who’s tactically astute.

 

[Deity]

Who would want to follow MR, especially after this backlash and with the possibility of not being able to bring in their own staff.
Stinks of a Bloomfield type appointment.

You are joking right?

They will be forming a long queue

really well invested squad

27,000 fans for home matches

brand new training facilities

ambitious owner

Any manager worth there salt will fancy their ability to harness all that potential ….