Nick
Administrator
We had this debate earlier.
You couldn't state anything that has been missed out or misquoted or was not factual in his article.
All you did was mention his boycott and his aledged social media status, which I couldn't give a monkeys about.
Maybe he has an angle or an agenda. Who knows and who cares.
However, don't criticise a well written peice that is factual.
We should all want the same thing on here.
Unfortunately it will not happen without the court case being dropped or enormous goodwill from Wasps.
I have pointed out something that has been missed out? The first couple of things that stood out without even opening news articles (because I did it a couple of days ago to correct Tony) when I was at the computer.
Who cares about the agendas behind things? They are usually telling as to what's going on to be fair.
Why wouldn't somebody care about an angle or the reasoning behind it? The approach shouldn't be side with other parties who have fucked us over. We keep seeing it time and time again and all it does is give them a free pass.
The council leader gloated about it a few weeks ago knowing full well be can say and do whatever.
As for the boycott stuff I mentioned, is it not relevant that somebody going to those lengths to push a certain agenda doesn't even realise the reason for him not going to see the club he supports doesn't exist?