Not what I said, which was pretty much the opposite. Lots of reasons for people to stop thinking like this...
It didn't. Luton were the better team over the season, and the one before that. They were better almost all game.
"Most of the stadium knew he would miss" is balls. Everyone around me said that about every pen besides Vik.
Edit: unless all these people are Vulcans or something and time isn't linear to them, or the SBA are all clairvoyents.
No - it didn't. Ben Wilson making no saves, us being largely sh*t all game incl. ET, losing a coin toss all added up.
I can see why getting that far and missing out is a frustration. What I won't let slide is people's fixation on blame.
Yep, and I'd argue the obsession with finding someone to blame is the definition of childish.
A mature mindset understands that Dabo missed, that we lost, that lots of things explain that, and moves on.
People rounding on a man with the guts to take that pen when others didn't pisses me off, so I'll call bullsh*t.
and Thanks.
...but call a spade a spade
Yes unfortunate use of the English language there. Hindsight is the easiest knowledge to learn. Dabo scores, Sheaf misses then its “I knew Sheaf would miss”You seem to be extremely sensitive about this, and Dabo.
Unless my part of the stadium was some kind of closed off echo-chamber, the reactions from people around clearly showed there was a disbelief he was stepping up. Swearing, people sitting back in the seats, people holding their heads in their hands. Even if you thought one or two of the others might not be the best choice, Dabo was in a category of his own. To say that wasn't the case is just denial and makes your argument completely unbelievable. 'At least he had the balls' is also white flag territory. It was game over as soon as he stepped forward.
The biggest denominator that we didn't win was a missed penalty by someone who wasn't good enough to take it. You can blame many other variables, but call a spade a spade, this was the biggest one.
Good luck with that one.
I've said all I want to on this.
I agree but think we are in the minority (even have to check if this word is non-offensive but could think of no other) on this thread.So we have now gone from 'we lost a penalty shootout but it has nothing to do with the guy that missed' and a set of tantrums...
...To 'I've said all I want to on this' and a Jay-Z GIF.
About as much of a surprise as Dabo missing a penalty. The amount of denial on this is staggering.
Yes it was, seems very unfair.How did we end up second and in front of their fans? Was it two coin tosses?
Yes it was, seems very unfair.
Yup, it's ridiculous to allow a team two advantages. It should be one toss for end or going first.Yes it was, seems very unfair.
Maybe the solution is to have both goals in use with, say, both teams going at “the wrong end” (FFS I’ve just read that back). It’s doable, probably means Lino’s have to jog a bit but at least the Goalkeepers stay put.Yup, it's ridiculous to allow a team two advantages. It should be one toss for end or going first.
I'm sure someone has a hour or two free on a Friday afternoon to dig out the stats on these...
Sorry, don't know.Really does. When did they change that?
Yup, it's ridiculous to allow a team two advantages. It should be one toss for end or going first.
I'm sure someone has a hour or two free on a Friday afternoon to dig out the stats on these...
The ABBA system was fairer but deemed over complicated. Surely better to be fair when utimately the winner takes it all.
YesHow did we end up second and in front of their fans? Was it two coin tosses?
You seem to be extremely sensitive about this, and Dabo.
Unless my part of the stadium was some kind of closed off echo-chamber, the reactions from people around clearly showed there was a disbelief he was stepping up. Swearing, people sitting back in the seats, people holding their heads in their hands. Even if you thought one or two of the others might not be the best choice, Dabo was in a category of his own. To say that wasn't the case is just denial and makes your argument completely unbelievable. 'At least he had the balls' is also white flag territory. It was game over as soon as he stepped forward.
The biggest denominator that we didn't win was a missed penalty by someone who wasn't good enough to take it. You can blame many other variables, but call a spade a spade, this was the biggest one.
Yes
Or, your confirmation bias… You don’t know why the people were saying ‘ffs’ or whatever. You’re assuming it was because of the taker.
I can’t quite remember what I did, but I felt dejected after every Luton penalty because sooner or later someone was going to miss.
Do you think that Real Ale Twats and Sky-Blue trainer wearing paedophiles are two completely separate sub-sets?Extra-Special Bitter for the Real Ale Twats amongst us, fortunately it seems to fit ESB1
The level of denial on here is tiresome. I could understand playing it down if it was a non-league game, or a checkatrade knockout match, but this was one of the biggest games in world football that we had a chance of winning, no matter what took us there, yet we blew it at the last.
I'm not assuming the crowd reaction was because of the taker. It was because of the taker. The timing was perfectly synchronised with him stepping up. Unless you're going to try and convince me an act of God occurred at the very same second which had the crowd in shock? A lot of people knew he would miss, and he did. Personally he would have been the last person on the list to take one, and anyone saying he should have taken one within the club (himself included) have a portion of blame. I question anyone that thought he would score.
We lost because of a penalty. The penalty was taken by someone not good enough to take it. Thousands in the stadium knew it before and just because a few people on here that seem vocal enough to protect Dabo to the death doesn't change that. We are now at the point of 'we lost a penalty shootout and failed to get promoted, but that has nothing to do with the guy who missed the penalty'.
It is an astonishing level of denial.
Dabo wasn’t good enough to be kept on but that didn’t mean he wasn’t the 6th best taker on the field at that time.
Couldn't disagree more I'm afraid.
People keep talking about Bidwell and McFadzean (who I still would have backed over Dabo), but we also had Panzo and Doyle. I think because they were loan players they are immediately discounted, but the former could strike a ball very well. Dabo should have been an absolute last resort, and I don't buy the notion he was the only one willing to step forward (you can even see Bidwell go forward initially before some conversation takes place). It is fabricated argument to distract away from the fact of the matter.
Putting him forward lost us the game. Not a draw against Swansea earlier in the season, not the colour of Joys handbag, and certainly not any other variable that had a 0.0001% influence. We had a player that was no where near good enough, especially on goal. He took a penalty. He missed the target. We lost the shootout. We lost the game.
You apA few on this board may be in denial,
And it's hard to imagine Dabo fighting them off to take one either!But what’s your counterfactual? Bidwell goes up and misses? Fadz goes up and misses?
We could just as easily blame Wilson for failing to save one of multiple attempts. Football does work like that. Just like Godden didn’t cost us a point last week cos we have no idea how Ipswich would have responded.
You’re trying to control the uncontrollable and retcon some great insight about Dabo not being the right person. Bidwell had taken three in his career the last five years ago and he missed. As far as I can tell Fadz has taken one in his career and missed it.
There’s no evidence either way. It is what it is.
Panzohe would have been the the last person to take a penalty in that situation. He almost threw the game away and got lucky and looked a bag of nerves throughout.
Couldn't disagree more I'm afraid.
People keep talking about Bidwell and McFadzean (who I still would have backed over Dabo), but we also had Panzo and Doyle. I think because they were loan players they are immediately discounted, but the former could strike a ball very well. Dabo should have been an absolute last resort, and I don't buy the notion he was the only one willing to step forward (you can even see Bidwell go forward initially before some conversation takes place). It is fabricated argument to distract away from the fact of the matter.
Putting him forward lost us the game. Not a draw against Swansea earlier in the season, not the colour of Joys handbag, and certainly not any other variable that had a 0.0001% influence. We had a player that was no where near good enough, especially on goal. He took a penalty. He missed the target. We lost the shootout. We lost the game.
I wonder what you would have said had Bidwell missed. Who would you have blamed then?'No one else wanted to take one'.
Bidwell clearly steps forward first as well.
View attachment 32717
And Dabo wrestles the ball off him before performing a smackdown to make sure he can't get up.'No one else wanted to take one'.
Bidwell clearly steps forward first as well.
View attachment 32717
I wonder what you would have said had Bidwell missed. Who would you have blamed then?
And Dabo wrestles the ball off him before performing a smackdown to make sure he can't get up.
Face it, it's on the rest of the team rather than some bizarre witch hunt against Dabo which is truly truly insane
This absolute conviction that the thing you didn't do is always better than the thing you did do is a weird (and modern?) one.What's insane is that some people will die on any hill as to not apportion any blame from the final on Dabo. That's what this is all about. You are too soft to call it what it is and now we in a territory where the amount of stupid arguments going on aren't a million miles away from 'I know you are, but what am I'. It is beyond parody, but obviously easier to play clowns than to accept what actually happened.
Had Dabo gone 10th and missed would I feel different? Yes. Had Bidwell missed, would I feel different? Also yes. Him, Panzo, and McNally all would have been better options than Dabo. Even if a corner of SBT too wet and limp to accept the truth say otherwise.
We lost the final. Dabo missed a penalty. He should have never taken one. It really is as simple as that, even if you don't like it.
I agree.Panzohe would have been the the last person to take a penalty in that situation. He almost threw the game away and got lucky and looked a bag of nerves throughout.
And that's fine. I don't think people are really arguing with your view tbh, I'd have thought Bidwell given he takes set pieces. But it's the hang Dabo for missing that's the difficulty thing to get by on this Gyokeres(!) thread, rather than what you've been writing.Many were surprised to see Dabo, that’s all.
Yes, fair one.And that's fine. I don't think people are really arguing with your view tbh, I'd have thought Bidwell given he takes set pieces. But it's the hang Dabo for missing that's the difficulty thing to get by on this Gyokeres(!) thread, rather than what you've been writing.
The level of desperation just gets worse.
Regardless of his slip up (which I agree was bad), anyone that would have Dabo take a penalty over Panzo is really just fuelling the denial argument. The way we are going, it wouldn't surprise me if Forest Green Rovers had an uptake in shirt sales in the Coventry area for Christmas!
I still think Man City....Would only have to make 5 appearances to be eligible...
Although arsenal will bottle it and man city/Liverpool will win 20 on the bounce in the new year I'm sure
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?