Gyokeres fee (1 Viewer)

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Unfortunately, I could see him ending up at Leicester, especially now that Vardy is coming to the end of his career.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Then you do what every football club does “alright Victor’s agent, don’t sign a new contract, we’ll take him on a free, give him 5m and 40k a week”

Yeah, this is what I’m concerned about with him entering final year of his contract and why we need a few clubs interested.
 

long way home

Well-Known Member
King wants prem football and will of worked out with MR the plan to reach that goal. Keeping or selling the likes of Vik, Hamer or Sheaf will be talked about and valuations put on each with replacing them part of the conversation.

Selling Vik sounds obvious come summer if he hasn't extended. But im not sure its a cert the fee excepted will have to be enough to enable MR to replace and add. If the potential fee doesn't do that could it be a calculated gamble to keep Vik and add.

Sounds unlikely but im sure that option is still on the table along with all others. Summer is going to be a busy one no matter what with players, ground, training facility, new kits and more coming from King himself on plans for the club. All this with Ashley hovering overhead, never a dull moment being a fan of this club.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
For christ sake.

So if I say no thanks to the £15m what happens then?

It’s not fucking eBay
You really are either fucking clueless or doubling down and missing the point entirely
 

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
Then you do what every football club does “alright Victor’s agent, don’t sign a new contract, we’ll take him on a free, give him 5m and 40k a week”
That’s similar to the Bereton-Diaz situation, no?

Hate to say it but this is where having a Mike Ashley type owner who could afford to say “Alright Viktor, we will match the £5m as a signing on fee and the wages. Here’s clause about injuries and insurance.”

That way, it’ll cost us £5m plus £6m in wages to keep him but we’ll have a player that (if fit and in form) is worth a lot more.

This all echoes the original SISU panic when Westwood didn’t sign a new contract. They realised that an asset they valued at (say) £3m was actually worth FA. They then panicked and sold anyone under contract worth a bean (Best) and put numpties like Bell on long contracts. The rest is tragic history.

As I said months ago (and got 😂 at), we need to get Vik tied down with a hefty contract.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
That’s similar to the Bereton-Diaz situation, no?

Hate to say it but this is where having a Mike Ashley type owner who could afford to say “Alright Viktor, we will match the £5m as a signing on fee and the wages. Here’s clause about injuries and insurance.”

That way, it’ll cost us £5m plus £6m in wages to keep him but we’ll have a player that (if fit and in form) is worth a lot more.

This all echoes the original SISU panic when Westwood didn’t sign a new contract. They realised that an asset they valued at (say) £3m was actually worth FA. They then panicked and sold anyone under contract worth a bean (Best) and put numpties like Bell on long contracts. The rest is tragic history.

As I said months ago (and got 😂 at), we need to get Vik tied down with a hefty contract.
Talk about saying the bleeding obvious
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
King wants prem football and will of worked out with MR the plan to reach that goal. Keeping or selling the likes of Vik, Hamer or Sheaf will be talked about and valuations put on each with replacing them part of the conversation.

Selling Vik sounds obvious come summer if he hasn't extended. But im not sure its a cert the fee excepted will have to be enough to enable MR to replace and add. If the potential fee doesn't do that could it be a calculated gamble to keep Vik and add.

Sounds unlikely but im sure that option is still on the table along with all others. Summer is going to be a busy one no matter what with players, ground, training facility, new kits and more coming from King himself on plans for the club. All this with Ashley hovering overhead, never a dull moment being a fan of this club.
He will be gone in the summer, there’s now way they’ll risk him leaving on a free.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
That’s similar to the Bereton-Diaz situation, no?

Hate to say it but this is where having a Mike Ashley type owner who could afford to say “Alright Viktor, we will match the £5m as a signing on fee and the wages. Here’s clause about injuries and insurance.”

That way, it’ll cost us £5m plus £6m in wages to keep him but we’ll have a player that (if fit and in form) is worth a lot more.

This all echoes the original SISU panic when Westwood didn’t sign a new contract. They realised that an asset they valued at (say) £3m was actually worth FA. They then panicked and sold anyone under contract worth a bean (Best) and put numpties like Bell on long contracts. The rest is tragic history.

As I said months ago (and got 😂 at), we need to get Vik tied down with a hefty contract.
I would be amazed if he signed a new one; it gives him less leverage in the summer and he’ll be wanting to move on if offered the chance.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
That’s similar to the Bereton-Diaz situation, no?

Hate to say it but this is where having a Mike Ashley type owner who could afford to say “Alright Viktor, we will match the £5m as a signing on fee and the wages. Here’s clause about injuries and insurance.”

That way, it’ll cost us £5m plus £6m in wages to keep him but we’ll have a player that (if fit and in form) is worth a lot more.

This all echoes the original SISU panic when Westwood didn’t sign a new contract. They realised that an asset they valued at (say) £3m was actually worth FA. They then panicked and sold anyone under contract worth a bean (Best) and put numpties like Bell on long contracts. The rest is tragic history.

As I said months ago (and got 😂 at), we need to get Vik tied down with a hefty contract.
Exactly like that situation - and now Blackburn are scrambling around to get him to sign a new deal which he isn’t.

we’re not in any strong position here, which some of our fans think we are. We’re not a rich club and need to sell players to keep us going. Letting Gyokeres run his contract down isn’t going to happen - with that in mind his value is dropping drastically.

we’re in the same position with Hamer and O’Hare - in fact their values are probably not that high anymore
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
with that in mind his value is dropping drastically.
Think it all depends how many are after him. Remember, if a club wants him, but won't pay the asking price, they run the risk of getting gazumped, Confident we'll get at least £10m (which we'll need, as we need 3 new strikers in all probability)
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
A year is still a year, it's not like his value will go up in a puff of smoke in the close season.
 

chinamans view

Well-Known Member
Dont under value our players, he is the best forward to leave the championship ever, that means he should go for over 30m even if he only has 12 months left on contract, talk of 10m is laughable. may be that figure with only 6 months left in Jan 2024.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
Dont under value our players, he is the best forward to leave the championship ever, that means he should go for over 30m even if he only has 12 months left on contract, talk of 10m is laughable. may be that figure with only 6 months left in Jan 2024.
Lol if it gets to Jan 1st his value becomes 0 on the basis he can sign pre contract agreements abroad.

if it was last summer - we could ask 30m, now it depends how much we need the money it’ll be much closer to 10m than 30 in his final year. Just look at Brereton Diaz
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
Lol if it gets to Jan 1st his value becomes 0 on the basis he can sign pre contract agreements abroad.

if it was last summer - we could ask 30m, now it depends how much we need the money it’ll be much closer to 10m than 30 in his final year. Just look at Brereton Diaz
If it was last summer his stock was nowhere near what it is now.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Why are we so negative on this?

You're a manager, offered £gazillions to spunk. You have a choice of spunking it on the players you want to lead you to success and boost your own reputation, or waiting a year for them to be out of contract, by which stage you may well be sacked.

What would you do if you wanted said player, and other clubs did too?!?
 

ProfessorbyGrace

Well-Known Member
Well, it seems provident for the club to allow him to leave, given the contract situation and if a decent bid comes in - £15-18 million would be sensible, and anything less than £15m would be scandalous in my opinion.

Then it beggars the question…who the heck will replace him? For me, it’ll be nigh on impossible to find a like for like replacement, who brings the energy, aggression and goals to the team, as Vik does.
 

long way home

Well-Known Member
He will be gone in the summer, there’s now way they’ll risk him leaving on a free.

Most would not be shocked if that is the outcome. But i don't think we know enough about King yet, id wait and see before we say our Vik goodbye. As he still is under contract so unless he e downs tools King and MR have a decision to make.
 
Last edited:

robbiethemole

Well-Known Member
Well, Warnock reckons he'll be gone in the summer, so it must be right!! old Colin wouldn't lie or play mind games, would he???
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Of course he might have done an ACL before the end of the season. Nothing is certain in football.

Selling in the summer (if he continues his form and development) at the momement seems the sensible option.

However there is a possibility him and his agent could sit it all out and he goes for free. I go back to nothing is certain in football.

The only thing that is certain, is the situation in football is fluid and it changes week by week. All those scouts are monitoring, also monitoring lots of other players, monitoring or scouting is not writing cheques.
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
It's laughable how many people think we can just cash in on him at the end of the season, it's as if he doesn't have a say in the matter.

He can just decide that he's not signing for anyone, regardless of if the club accept an offer.

If he sits tight for another season, then he walks away on a free transfer, and bags himself a huge wage and signing on fee.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top