Out of interest, what's the rational for sending the Birmingham player off?It's a red for both players.
Out of interest, what's the rational for sending the Birmingham player off?
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
It's six of one and half a dozen of another, until Hamer kicks him in the head whilst looking directly at him. Shouldn't have lost his rag.Even with the sky bluest of sky blue lenses I'm baffled people don't think that's a red...
It looked like the Birmingham player kicked out at Hamer first and was holding Hamers legs. I’m not entirely sure that Hamer caught him in the face either. Looked unmarked, unlike Godden’s shiner from mid week.Out of interest, what's the rational for sending the Birmingham player off?
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Out of interest, what's the rational for sending the Birmingham player off?
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
I still don't think that's intentional. Just my opinion though, will see what the club decide to do. Appreciate he has form for doing stupid shit so it's hard to give benefit of the doubt.
Club will probably not appeal because of the high cost. What is it, £50?
Isnt there a risk that it’s deemed frivolous and you get an extra ban? What’s the appeal based on?
That's just it isn't, he's an annoying bastard and we all want to kick him the head, but it is against the rules, sadly.Hairstyle
Isnt there a risk that it’s deemed frivolous and you get an extra ban? What’s the appeal based on?
What people have failed to realise is that it was clearly a foul on Hamer before he was on the floor having his legs held.
Exactly the same foul by Sheaf in the first half and he was yellowed.
Player came in and tackled at the side.
Just no consistency by refs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Robins:
"It looked to me like he was being wrestled and [Hannibal] Mejbri was holding his legs, and I think Gus tried to get his legs away but then you run the risk."
I still think it’s more of a wriggle at worst. Not karate kicks as people keep saying.
Wasn't it more like "Gus has...then he's tried to...and then he's...and then you run the risk" It was an exercise in fill-in-the-blanks. Robins clearly censored himself.Robins:
"It looked to me like he was being wrestled and [Hannibal] Mejbri was holding his legs, and I think Gus tried to get his legs away but then you run the risk."
Guess we will appeal then
Wasn't it more like "Gus has...then he's tried to...and then he's...and then you run the risk" It was an exercise in fill-in-the-blanks. Robins clearly censored himself.
Robins:
"It looked to me like he was being wrestled and [Hannibal] Mejbri was holding his legs, and I think Gus tried to get his legs away but then you run the risk."
He’s still our best player, just needs to curb his enthusiasm somewhat. We’d be a poorer team without him. Every team needs a Hamer type in their team.
No way is he our best player.He’s still our best player, just needs to curb his enthusiasm somewhat. We’d be a poorer team without him. Every team needs a Hamer type in their team.
We’re a better team when he’s playing but he’s a liability and it’s getting to the point where he’s costing us points because he can’t control himself.I don't get what people don't see in Hamer. He's infuriating, can be sloppy, but the talent is obvious. We're a better team when he's playing.
There’s no way we’re going to appeal.If we appeal and fail could the ban be extended, there is no mistaking that as violent play, and given the proximity to his head and lashing out three times is really not a good look to go to the EFL with..
He’s still our best player, just needs to curb his enthusiasm somewhat. We’d be a poorer team without him. Every team needs a Hamer type in their team.
So you are happy his indiscipline has cost us his services for 4 games? Thanks just making sure we are clearAssume those that don't rate him will be pleased that he's out for a few weeks.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?