Well, a different view to your own can always be seen as "silly" and "embarrassing", can't it? We'll just have to agree to disagree and support the team and administration as we see fit. Nowt else to do.
Who ever believes SISU have invested £40m in CCFC need therapy
I'm sorry, but when you try and reinforce an argument by citing Chester, a conference side; Aldershot a 4th division club, and Rushden & Diamonds - what, another conference team - and ignore much pertinent examples from true peers such as Southampton, Leicester, Ipswich, Leeds, Palace, Derby, then you're ever liable to be labelled as 'silly'; as the stance you're pursuing is so facetious as to be without merit. Unless you're trying to peddle a politik in a wholly blinkered manner, of course.....
Ignore him MMM - he's always right you know even when the facts are blatantly obvious.
Oh yes, I remember you still think there's "plenty" of investors waiting to take us over. They're queueing outside the Ricoh apparently to make it all better.
All those teams you just mentioned probably went into admin owning their own stadiums, whilst we don't. Therefore making our club far less desirable for potential owners.
Ignore him MMM - he's always right you know even when the facts are blatantly obvious.
Oh the irony of you posting that to MMM!
We all have our opinions, some different to others, just because Torch's is different doesnt mean he is always right, its just what he believes is different to what you believe. Is that too difficult to grasp?
If we all agreed on everything then there would be no need for this forum.
Even though I don't share Torches views at the end of the day he is a fellow fan and I know he wants the best for CCFC like all of us on here do.
Oh the irony of you posting that to MMM!
We all have our opinions, some different to others, just because Torch's is different doesnt mean he is always right, its just what he believes is different to what you believe. Is that too difficult to grasp?
I too agree that opinions should be respected, but there's got to be the basis of an understanding of context to underpin any debate. If someone tells me the Isle of Wight had a platoon of crack marines that could militarily defeat the USA, then my riposte is always going to be a touch acidic...
Has this been on the news when did the Isle of Wight breed this master race
If we all agreed on everything then there would be no need for this forum.
Even though I don't share Torches views at the end of the day he is a fellow fan and I know he wants the best for CCFC like all of us on here do.
I'd like to congratulate them on possibly one of the few decisions they have got correct in five miserable footballing years..........that is the appointment of Mr Robins. Now don't ruin it with this pathetic charade over our Stadium and stick with the turnaround. This means somehow holding together the team that has only lost 1/10 and has provided you with 5 extra home cup games and two lucrative trips to North London. For the first real time since the takeover once you've accepted ACLs much improved terms you have the chance with further on field success, bigger gates, TV revenue, a JPT trip to Wembley plus maybe play offs and promotion a chance of at least breaking even if not turning a small profit.
If the Rugby club can turn things round financially from their position and on gates of 900 then so can the Sky Blues.
If we all agreed that 'sisu are scum' then there would be more posts on this forum as nobody would be called 'idiot', 'clueless' and what have you ...
How time flies, when it doesn't fall wanking to the floor.
But you really are clueless! If any further proof of that was needed I refer you to your view that text a sub was a fantastic idea! You're more pro Sisu than feckin Sisu!
Oh, and for the record ... I still think it could be a fun gimmick and I am pretty sure that if implemented quite a lot of fans at the match would use it, thereby providing some extra match revenue for the club.
Oh the irony of you posting that to MMM!
We all have our opinions, some different to others, just because Torch's is different doesnt mean he is always right, its just what he believes is different to what you believe. Is that too difficult to grasp?
Great reply..
I'll say it again Look at Southampton 5 years ago when SISU tried to take them over. Now look where they are. Complete turnaround compared to us. Thanks to SISU.
Tell you what's difficult to grasp, torch logic behind how good SISU are for the club! The last 5 years have been awful on and off the pitch. Torch used to say how great a manager Thorn was and saying no-one could do a better job. I think any CCFC would agree robins in his 3 months has done more than Thorn in his 18 months. I agree everyone has a different opinion and that's what this board is about but sometimes you do think how certain fans think in there logic of SISU.
I happen to applaud novel ideas ... innovation ... and that makes me clueless?
Actually it was Len Brody that came up with the idea. And he is no part of sisu. Never was. He came up with the txt idea at a time when a lot of people couldn't understand the substitution policy carried out by the manager. As always, the club was looking for an increase of revenue and he came up with the idea. He recognized that there were about 15.000 'managers' in the stands - and every one has their own opionon to who should be taken off and who should be put in. Brody initially meant the txt result should be an order to the manager, but he later soften it and said it could work as 'a suggestion'.
I appluaded that somebody actually tried to do something different because if we keep doing the same we'll never get anywhere.
Oh, and for the record ... I still think it could be a fun gimmick and I am pretty sure that if implemented quite a lot of fans at the match would use it, thereby providing some extra match revenue for the club.
Thank you over the last five years for.......
Tell you what's difficult to grasp, torch logic behind how good SISU are for the club! The last 5 years have been awful on and off the pitch. Torch used to say how great a manager Thorn was and saying no-one could do a better job. I think any CCFC would agree robins in his 3 months has done more than Thorn in his 18 months. I agree everyone has a different opinion and that's what this board is about but sometimes you do think how certain fans think in there logic of SISU.
Would have worked great at the Southampton game last season when are bench was as followed.
Did anybody want to pay for a vote on who should be subbed on from them lot?
- 13 Dunn
- 39 Henderson
- 38 Roberts
- 22 Platt
- 27 Jeffers
[/QUOTE)
This is why I think it is harsh to try and compare AT last season with MR this season
Would have worked great at the Southampton game last season when are bench was as followed.
Did anybody want to pay for a vote on who should be subbed on from them lot?
- 13 Dunn
- 39 Henderson
- 38 Roberts
- 22 Platt
- 27 Jeffers
[/QUOTE)
This is why I think it is harsh to try and compare AT last season with MR this season
We're they the subs for every game?
If robins had been in charge last season are you saying he would have been incapable of generating any more points than thorn?
Frankly to even compare the two is nothing short of disgraceful. Robins has dove fantastically well to turn around the atmosphere within the club. To even hint thorn would be even in the same universe in terms of ability as robins is very very poor im afraid.
Even baker apparently is joining in the banter about thorns training sessions....or lack of them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?