I think you've summed it up well.Just wondering what people's thoughts are regarding the idea of making heading footballs an "issue"? (As in BBC News).
Personally, I think it's all bollox. Players have been heading the ball for decades. Years ago, when the ball was made of thick leather and a bloody great lace holding it together, was what they had to put up with, but these days, the balls are much lighter. How many fantastic goals have been headed home? You only need to look at my avatar to be reminded of one of the greatest headed goals ever!
I might be totally wrong in my way of thinking, and I'll accept judgement, but would love to hear other posters views.
Isn't the issue with modern footballs the speed they can travel at?
I can definitely understand it with the older, heavier footballs of yesteryear.
Needs more research and study.
Rugby seems to have a much bigger problem than football, you would have to say.
It still shocks me that Boxing is still allowed, I suppose they are worried that if it is banned it will still carry on unlicensed.
Well surely they should look at Boxing before football shouldn't they?We know repeated trauma causes damage and yet we think it’s woke ffs come on guys
When I played many moons ago (started in early 1960's), I had a heavy pair of solid leather boots with solid studs and steel toe caps. Those old footballs could be kicked just as hard!.......especially as boots were not as good......
Oh, isn't it? I always thought they said it was. I take it the science has changed then.Yes, the 'old leather ball' stuff isn't correct.
Honestly, any opportunity to embarrass yourself!I think you've summed it up well.
And I wouldn't listen too much to the BBC, they've become a very bizarre organisation.
Maybe they should look at clearing out the nonces and abusers that appear to have infested them, rather than looking at footballs.
But while they were heavy and solid, you wouldn't be able to swing your foot as fast. Not saying people couldn't kick it hard (probably needed the protection given the weight of the ball) but I reckon it would even itself out to some degree.When I played many moons ago (started in early 1960's), I had a heavy pair of solid leather boots with solid studs and steel toe caps. Those old footballs could be kicked just as hard!
My son played in a game last week against a team of u17s who didn't contest any headers when defending corners and from their own corners the ball wasn't hit in the air.
But your opinion is meaningless.Personally, I think it's all bollox.
Think they areWell surely they should look at Boxing before football shouldn't they?
U10 I thinkIsn't it banned for kids football now?
Will be interesting what Professional football will look like when none of the players know how to header.
Isn't it banned for kids football now?
Will be interesting what Professional football will look like when none of the players know how to header.
Playing in 80s and heading those solid mitre balls from high goal kicks left me dazed and confused
Reading this, I've changed my mind, as clearly the damage is long term.Playing in 80s and heading those solid mitre balls from high goal kicks left me dazed and confused
Just wondering what people's thoughts are regarding the idea of making heading footballs an "issue"? (As in BBC News).
Personally, I think it's all bollox. Players have been heading the ball for decades. Years ago, when the ball was made of thick leather and a bloody great lace holding it together, was what they had to put up with, but these days, the balls are much lighter. How many fantastic goals have been headed home? You only need to look at my avatar to be reminded of one of the greatest headed goals ever!
I might be totally wrong in my way of thinking, and I'll accept judgement, but would love to hear other posters views.
One day you might post something well informed and researched. You are the clown criticising the BBC and 'wokeness' for reporting on links between brain injuries and heading footballs.Reading this, I've changed my mind, as clearly the damage is long term.
Where have I mentioned "wokeness"?One day you might post something well informed and researched. You are the clown criticising the BBC and 'wokeness' for reporting on links between brain injuries and heading footballs.
He did quote the numbers but I cant remember them.
No agenda and not trying to wind you up.. You criticised the BBC for reporting on potential heading ban mate, ffs. Did Daily Mail and GBNews not report on it? Most media outlets did.Where have I mentioned "wokeness"?
I'm criticising the BBC for their history of covering up for abusers who they continued to employ, often without investigation, (sometimes for years) after numerous independant allegations where made.
I've no idea what your agenda is, but I suggest in future you might take a little more time to actually read my posts rather than trying to apply your own warped narrative.
I laughed at your comment suggesting that I should be the one needing to be more informed and researched! ..Oh such irony!
Did you head the ball a lot when you were younger Clint?
Tell that to people like Jeff Astle's familyI think you've summed it up well.
And I wouldn't listen too much to the BBC, they've become a very bizarre organisation.
Maybe they should look at clearing out the nonces and abusers that appear to have infested them, rather than looking at footballs.
wowI think you've summed it up well.
And I wouldn't listen too much to the BBC, they've become a very bizarre organisation.
Maybe they should look at clearing out the nonces and abusers that appear to have infested them, rather than looking at footballs.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?