Yes because they would be paying a charity. Now we discover why Tim Fisher and ML keep distancing themselves from SISU
So decisions such as not paying rent is nothing to do with SISU trying to break ACL
How much have the council taken out so far to swell their coffers?
She must have been well versed for this cross examination yet it is going horribly wrong. TF may turn it round he is far slicker. It's a great shame ML and JS are not giving evidence
Top top point Godiva
Not much, but that's down to them as much as anything. They got £21m from ACL at the beginning for the lease.
How did Fisher put it ... oh yes, Joy is very hands on at the club.
How did Fisher put it ... oh yes, Joy is very hands on at the club.
* Ms Deering confirms Sisu only continued to fund club in 2012 because they thought they could secure charity's stake in the Ricoh.
So there you have it, they are only here still because they still think they'll get the Higg's share, they are fucking staking everything on it, hence for now the continued funding. It's gonna go tits up in the end for us!
True, but there is a subtle difference between joy being hands on and whether the sisu management board formally discussed and agreed the strategy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert28sDeering says Sisu never authorised the non-payment of rent. That was football club decision. Club paid ACL £10k per match after rent ceased
This is what confused me:
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert18sDeering believes Sisu were lead up the garden path while the council / charity did a deal for the bank debt.
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert18sDeering believes the original transaction fell apart after the exclusivity period. Could be a key point.
used to pay off loan taken out by council to build ricoh. I think it was actually 23 million.That £21m wasn't taken out of the project wIas it? Thought that was spent on the Ricoh.
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert12sSisu QC back interviewing Miss Deering now.
True, but there is a subtle difference between joy being hands on and whether the sisu management board formally discussed and agreed the strategy.
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert33 secsDeering says discussions with council were still ongoing at same time. She feels Sisu should have been told about bank deal.
Less than £29K.So why look to purchase it at all..... let alone pay reported sume of 2m, 5.5m etc etc
Wonder what they think it is worth now?
looks like sisu at the victims
humble pie anyone?
looks like sisu at the victims
humble pie anyone?
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert33 secsDeering says discussions with council were still ongoing at same time. She feels Sisu should have been told about bank deal.
Words fail me....
looks like sisu at the victims
humble pie anyone?
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert28sDeering says Sisu never authorised the non-payment of rent. That was football club decision. Club paid ACL £10k per match after rent ceased
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?