So, pre-Sixfields, were we not meant to be interested then, huh? What about when Joy was seemingly wanting to liquidate the club unless she got what was wanted. Was that more or less important than the Colchester game?
In recent times, the off-field antics have always been more important than any given game. That's why we ended up in Northampton, if it hasn't escaped your attention?!?
Who has been awaiting a smoking gun?
Is lunchtime over yet.
Who has said don't be interested? It is the saddos who couldn't give a shit about the result on the pitch but get aroused when they think they can get one over SISU / ACL / The Council in some way.
Lol
All the sixfields posse in meltdown !!
Has it finally dawned on them that Sisu are not interested in ccfc and are sharks !!
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert30 secsLunchtime copy filed. Back in court now. Not sure if we'll get a verdict today. Check @covtelegraph website soon for the latest round-up.
The thing is, there only seems to be one side of the fence. Has anybody been on here posting how they pray to god SISU win this etc etc?
Who has said don't be interested? It is the saddos who couldn't give a shit about the result on the pitch but get aroused when they think they can get one over SISU / ACL / The Council in some way.
I'll say it again - they're not 'saddos'. They're people who see the off-the-field fare as being more significant in the long run than any given game.
And it must piss you off that these 'saddos' have been proven right, huh?
One thing I've learnt in the last three days is judges get bloody long lunch breaks!
ACL run the Ricoh and SISU final offer to Higgs was £2m for 50% share of ACL, half of the RICOH and they said Higgs share was worth ZERO, so they wanted it for nothing or maybe a £2m donation to the Higgs. No wonder the council decided to take over the loan.No they didn't, if you can't get even the most basic of facts right then you should probably not bother trying to analyse the statements in court.
There have been people maligning CCC and ACL all the time and gleefully waiting for the final proof that it is all their fault that CCFC is in the present position. Always seeking an alternative argument to the obvious point that SISU are in charge and that they carry the can. There are now more swear words coming from some posters and their attempts to turn everything against ACL and Higgs are becoming more desperate as the case goes on. I think it is clear that SISU will be shown the door again and then the bitching will really start on here. This is a shame as we all theoretically want CCFC to somehow survive this ignominous reign by SISU.
Not particularly pissed off at any result in court as long as it is for the good of the club and the truth comes out like I have said all along.
Yes, if people get more excited about a court case than watching the team I do class them as "saddos".
Not particularly pissed off at any result in court as long as it is for the good of the club and the truth comes out like I have said all along.
Yes, if people get more excited about a court case than watching the team I do class them as "saddos".
Sorry fellas, I am late to this party (open bar at all?).
Any explanation as to why certain witnesses were chosen for testimony? Is there a documents source at all, or is all evidence simply spoken he-said-she-said?
Trying to keep up with the testimonial facts on this thread is a nightmare... Thank you all in advance, and play nice hmm?
I'll ask the question again. If a court case is so significant to threaten the club's very existence, should it not be of more interest to many than any given game? That doesn't make them 'saddos'.
If SISU lose the Judicial review and then liquidate the club; there's no more football to watch, is there?
I'll say it again - they're not 'saddos'. They're people who see the off-the-field fare as being more significant in the long run than any given game.
And it must piss you off that these 'saddos' have been proven right, huh?
I'll ask the question again. If a court case is so significant to threaten the club's very existence, should it not be of more interest to many than any given game? That doesn't make them 'saddos'.
If SISU lose the Judicial review and then liquidate the club; there's no more football to watch, is there? Then, I have no idea where Torchy and his mates are going to go to 'just support the lads'
I will definately have an added spring in my step at the Peterborough match !!!
You want SISU to win the JR?
Who has said don't be interested? It is the saddos who couldn't give a shit about the result on the pitch but get aroused when they think they can get one over SISU / ACL / The Council in some way.
Why will you have had your colonic irrigation?
You say I am way off the mark, prove the council have taken proffit out of ACL, go on put the paperwork up on here.Yet again, way off the mark.
We're now in an impossible situation.
From what I have heard in court so far; they don't appear to have a credible case to back their actions. I can only see them winning on technicality. Am I happy for my club's owners to threaten the very existence of my club in the hope of winning some real estate by technicality? No. Do I want them to lose and liquidate the club. No. We're now in an impossible situation.
To answer your question in one word. No. But yes
Who would that be?
How many threads do you want? Every poster with any anti-CCC/ACL sentiment has been telling us for months that lies/deceit/underhanded tactics would play out in the court cases . The last few days have been a taster for the JR. They haven't, have they? It's evident SISU's only chance is to prove the loan was technically incorrect. That's nowhere near the claims with regards the council's sinister involvement that have been widely foretold
Why cant people be interetsed in both and show the same passion for the team (not the f*cking owners) which clearly doesn't seem to happen.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?