Just got a feeling that this is the start of a quick resolution now.
Thats what I mean, so it was quite likely sisu could have had them?
But Higgs did take them to court. In most cases like this I think the judge would have awarded costs to SISU, they were forced to offer at least a defence (though not a counter-claim) and that costs money. I'm surprised that SISU haven't asked for costs.
Both sides must have costs running into five figures here, possibly more.
Would be nice to think so. Unless SISU are confident on winning on a technicality, their evidence and witnesses to date don't seem to point towards certain victory. Loss is unthinkable for them; so common sense has to prevail, surely?
Look like a lot of deflated baloons on display tihis evening. Still I am sure the same experts will judge that the Judicial Review will be lost as well.
This will have cost Higgs a pretty penny. Tut Tut should have done their due dillegence MMM?
Not a wasted day though. We have learned that SISU did not sanction the club's rent withdrawal and that they were gonna donate £2 million to a local charity!
I think a charity has to seek legal advice when someone owes them a debt. Then whatever the legal advice says they have to follow it.
What's the value of that? What did they pay for their share?Their investment in ACL, which is more than a business simply holding a lease.
What did today cost them?
Look like a lot of deflated baloons on display this evening. Still I am sure the same experts will judge that the Judicial Review will be lost as well.
This will have cost Higgs a pretty penny. Tut Tut should have done their due dillegence MMM?
Thats what I mean, so it was quite likely sisu could have had them?
According to them taking it to court cost more than £29.000 and also I would assume the costs for their side of the court action.
Nice touch from Sisu to waiver their costs given that would have been significant as they clearly had no case to answer, don't you agree?
What I mean is, if SISU had claimed their expenses what would the chances be of getting them? Or would the judge have been that fed up of the tit for tat he just told them to just both sort their own out.
I wouldn't include the top one in your paragraph. To me that's a hammer blow for SISU no conspiracy. Maybe the SBT can take the part of the other conspiring party.
I said in the middle of this thread I will not take too much Glee from this woeful performance from SISU this is just the main targets mate they are bullying.
According to them taking it to court cost more than £29.000 and also I would assume the costs for their side of the court action.
Nice touch from Sisu to waiver their costs given that would have been significant as they clearly had no case to answer, don't you agree?
Does this put an end to "ripping off a poor Coventry Children's charity" ?
Does this put an end to "ripping off a poor Coventry Children's charity" ?
Does this put an end to "ripping off a poor Coventry Children's charity" ?
Yes it is a fact or me now no longer under debate.
They tried to rip them off for 3.5 million by under valuing their shares whilst not paying the rent. Then announcing in the public that ACL were going out of business
Is that not the same as significant?
So a coventry children's charity haven't been ripped off? In fact, they have only been ripped off by their legal team who advised them to do it and will be paid nicely for this week too?
So a coventry children's charity haven't been ripped off? In fact, they have only been ripped off by their legal team who advised them to do it and will be paid nicely for this week too?
Don't forget the counter claim of 290000 which ran up the lawyer's bill.
Making an offer isn't ripping them off is it? I could offer you £1 for your house, that isn't me ripping you off is it? I am not holding a gun to your head am I?
What's the value of that? What did they pay for their share?
To me, this result makes me think sisu are favourite to win the JR. From what I've read but I could be wrong, Sisu seemed to have shown that the council were trying to get another party to buy the club. Does that not in some way prove the conspiracy?
This is the most exciting day of my life!
Surely jr is about state aid not conspiracy
To be fair, I really don't know how I feel about this. But purely from an internet forumming point of view, this is gold.
To me, this result makes me think sisu are favourite to win the JR. From what I've read but I could be wrong, Sisu seemed to have shown that the council were trying to get another party to buy the club. Does that not in some way prove the conspiracy?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?