Hi guys, sorry I haven't had time to update directly!
Here's the full report http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/sisu-v-higgs-court-battle-6916957
The website is playing up a bit, so please be patient!
Thanks for your encouragement these past three days. It's been a real challenge.
And thanks for reading too!
judge made plain that the criticisms made by Sisu of the Trustees' conduct were "misplaced and unfortunate allegations" = bullshit
He (Judge Legget) said: “The criticisms made of the trustees by Sisu as to the propriety of their conduct and the allegations made about them undermining the bargain seem to me to be misplaced."
“It is unfortunate that accusations were made in some of the terms Sisu used in these proceedings.”
Christ I've grown a beard recently, is a scandal set to engulf me?
Christ I've grown a beard recently, is a scandal set to engulf me?
Having read every page of this saga I m just gutted that it shows how closed minded every one is.
Satan him/herself could be ACL /CCC/SISU or the Judge and everyone is so entrenched as to I hate one or the other.
Theres no middle ground. It seems as if there has to be one and only one winner and its not CCFC.
Some want a ACL/CCC win ,some, a few, want a SiSu win.
I m open minded, I do nt believe anyone has told the full truth. I believe Higgs wanted to sell their share to Sisu
or anyone really, but the Council played them and did nt allow it. Would that have been good ? I do nt know but we could have
been at the Ricoh now.
The saddest are the folk who have awaited the 'smoking gun', and all this council subterfuge to come out in court, who have had a taster of it in the last few days, and still refuse to see what's right in font of them; and still have no shame, and will happily trot along using the limp disguise of 'supporting the lads'. You're not supporting the lads, you're supporting the actions of those who are killing the club - but are too selfish to see past that clear fact
still refuse to see what's right in front of them; and still have no shame,
Having read every page of this saga I m just gutted that it shows how closed minded every one is.
Satan him/herself could be ACL /CCC/SISU or the Judge and everyone is so entrenched as to I hate one or the other.
Theres no middle ground. It seems as if there has to be one and only one winner and its not CCFC.
Some want a ACL/CCC win ,some, a few, want a SiSu win.
I m open minded, I do nt believe anyone has told the full truth. I believe Higgs wanted to sell their share to Sisu
or anyone really, but the Council played them and did nt allow it. Would that have been good ? I do nt know but we could have
been at the Ricoh now.
Higgs did try to sell their share to SISU. SISU offered to pay them over 10 years. 1.5m down and the rest over the 10 years. Higgs said no. Cash only. So SISU offered 2m full cash settlement. Of course Higgs turned it down. Nothing to do with CCC in the slightest. All this was from Deering whilst under oath.
I think the reality of the situation is that the price Higgs have negotiated [with SISU] is very significantly above the market value
and that even after the restructure I am proposing, the Charity would struggle to get much above this unless a substantial rent deal was
agreed with the Football Club.
CCC thought that Sisu's offer was above the market rate:
But a one person quote don't mean that Higgs should sell for 2m if they think it is worth more. A one person quote don't mean that CCC agreed. They seem to now value it as 7.5m as the revenues at the Ricoh are not looking bad at all considering there is no football club there ATM. And as said in court it would have to have passed the charity commission to have sold it at that rate. If it had got that far and the charity commission had said no....which there was a good chance that they would have done......Higgs would have got their 29k.
Ahh.the old spineless crap.again.
Sorry I must've missed any ongoing "spineless" stuff that's gone on before it's just the first thing that comes to mind?
Everyone's entitled to their opinion...but do you not agree that adopting this kind of attitude makes it easier for SISU to pull stuff like this off?
Are you of the same thought that you don't care what happens whatsoever as long as we are back at the Ricoh?
Ok so basically you dont agree that fans who go should be called spineless, but if they do then they're spineless?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
what is this now? 5-0 to sisu?
admin will get rid
council will force new owners
we will never move grounds
rejecting cva will show them
will lose to charity in court
lets stop poking the unstoppable beast and perhaps use them to bully out way back to being relevant?
if not we still got JR at least,that's where they will really get done over!
what is this now? 5-0 to sisu?
admin will get rid
council will force new owners
we will never move grounds
rejecting cva will show them
will lose to charity in court
lets stop poking the unstoppable beast and perhaps use them to bully out way back to being relevant?
if not we still got JR at least,that's where they will really get done over!
In terms of score-keeping, I make this:
SISU/ACL/CCC/FA/FL/Lawyers 8-0 CCFC Fans
In terms of score-keeping, I make this:
SISU/ACL/CCC/FA/FL/Lawyers 8-0 CCFC Fans
Went past a CET sign this morning that said SISU Win in Court, I wouldn't see it as a win though to be fair.
Went past a CET sign this morning that said SISU Win in Court, I wouldn't see it as a win though to be fair.
Went past a CET sign this morning that said SISU Win in Court, I wouldn't see it as a win though to be fair.
what is this now? 5-0 to sisu?
admin will get rid
council will force new owners
we will never move grounds
rejecting cva will show them
will lose to charity in court
lets stop poking the unstoppable beast and perhaps use them to bully out way back to being relevant?
if not we still got JR at least,that's where they will really get done over!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?