The reason SISU didn't sign was because they didn't think they were entitled to enough of the revenue streams, distressing ACL was just a way of trying to get the Ricoh on the cheap.
Okay agreed it probably is better agreeing a new deal with ACL, although Tim Fisher has said that we won't play there again, we don't live in La La Land so if you can think of some mythical reason as to why all of sudden Tim Fisher would say, "Hell with my idea I was only joking I will sit down with ACL" then I will be happy to hear it.
If SISU didn't sign the damn agreement then they have every right to look at alternative options based on what they're currently (or not in their case) paying/agreed. Just because they spoke about a different offer doesn't mean the one they had till that point was just a whisper in the wind.
I don't think Fisher will suddenly change his mind no, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't criticise him for it, he's chosen and been completely unable to back up a terrible idea and appears to be pushing ahead with it whatever the consequences while saying he has no choice. He certainly did and probably still does have a choice.
This plan is much much worse even after taking food and beverage etc into account so while yes that was his excuse it does not hold up, especially as acls deal did the best they could at giving the revenue for ffp.
They could say to acl now, sorry for our behaviour, if holdings hold the golden share after this administration busneis is done we would like to take the deal you offered before, while we arn't legally liable for the debt ran up by limited we will pay it to you as a signing bonus and we will fill up the escrow account. ACL would bit their hands off and this is a much more sensible idea from sisu than their current plan.
You don't press ahead with a plan to build a new stadium based on what you are contractually obligated to pay, you press ahead with a new stadium if its a better option than anything else, it isn't so you don't do it.
You realise of course holdings aren't contractually obligated to pay the 1.2mill rent and even if they were they would have to pay it even if they built a new stadium, they can't just break the contract.