D
Wyken Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Second 'goal' from Armstrong definitely looked onside to me. The first I'm not so sure.
We look to move the ball well but it's clear one up front isn't working. I would try a box standard 4-4-2 on Tues
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
We look to move the ball well but it's clear one up front isn't working. I would try a box standard 4-4-2 on Tues
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
Otis
Well-Known Member
Someone clearly needs to tell Mowbray that one up front isn't working.
We were at home yesterday and three times we had the ball just outside their penalty box and just Armstrong actually in the box all by himself.
How on earth are we expected to score in such a circumstance?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
He looks offside.
Soft penalty though but that header that the guy blocked was a freak and the other header was an easy chance.
I_Saw_Shaw_Score
Well-Known Member
That header their own bloke blocked on the line, why wasn't that offside!? Thought it at the time, the linos at this level are shocking.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Benefit of the doubt with the striker my arse. Both pretty tight and highlights confirm we had a good 15 minutes at the end of the first half
CJ_covblaze
Well-Known Member
IF anything for the first one he's a yard offside. Second one is very tight. I very much doubt that the lino could've made an informed choice though. Must've been a lucky guess.
Last edited:
stevefloyd
Well-Known Member
We looked all over them in the highlights...or should I say the video shit shit penalty though but both goals looked ok to me
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Unfortunately the highlight look kind to us, RCC made 1-2 good saves that aren't included. The reality is, both teams were very average and 0-0 would have been the fair result.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
lifeskyblue
Well-Known Member
I still think the second is onside. Lino wasn't up with it. Having said that over the 90 a draw was the fair result. Rochdale were poor and 'bullied' us. I was surprised a) that the ref allowed so much and b) that we did nothing about it. Does Madders diving antics go against the whole team? It really looks men against boys for a lot of the game.
How many times did we test their keeper....I only remember him making a couple of saves where he had to stretch at all.
The team badly lacks confidence and the belief to take players on.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How many times did we test their keeper....I only remember him making a couple of saves where he had to stretch at all.
The team badly lacks confidence and the belief to take players on.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
I'd say there is an argument for both, but despite what anyone says, we scored two goals, they just didn't count.
Had either gone in it 'could' have been different. We were punished at the death, but a draw overall would have been a fair result. Either way, it was a better performance than the previous two games.
Had either gone in it 'could' have been different. We were punished at the death, but a draw overall would have been a fair result. Either way, it was a better performance than the previous two games.
OffenhamSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
Second one def onside, first benefit of doubt to defence. Has RCC ever got close to saving a penalty?