Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Damn straightThen they will probably have the full support of everyone on here!
Damn straightThen they will probably have the full support of everyone on here!
Damn straight
What does amaze me is that so many people think should this admin move succeed or not that things will remain the same, that structures will remain unchanged, that new different agreements wont happen or at not possible. Look at it in different ways not the old way. Assume that ACL might want to get a deal that works, is secure, and stable from a new investor. Assume that the new investor actually knows the pitfalls and can approach the deal in a different way, is willing to work with not against ACL, and has money to invest in a future return (btw i think SISU have burnt all bridges so it wont work with them)
Take CCFC away from SISU and potentially there is a blank sheet on which to draw up rent agreements, income agreements etc. Yes it does mean that those income streams will have to be paid for/earnt/leased etc but surely when you buy into any business you are buying in to the income streams? ACL, IEC or compass own the rights to those income streams but there is potential there for a mutually beneficial deal to be done that keeps everyone happy.
Do not take the old model and apply it to the future ................ it wont be how it will be
What does amaze me is that so many people think should this admin move succeed or not that things will remain the same, that structures will remain unchanged, that new different agreements wont happen or are not possible. Look at it in different ways not the old way. Assume that ACL might want to get a deal that works, is secure, and stable from a new investor. Assume that the new investor actually knows the pitfalls and can approach the deal in a different way, is willing to work with not against ACL, and has money to invest in a future return (btw i think SISU have burnt all bridges so it wont work with them)
Take CCFC away from SISU and potentially there is a blank sheet on which to draw up rent agreements, income agreements etc. Yes it does mean that those income streams will have to be paid for/earnt/leased etc but surely when you buy into any business you are buying in to the income streams? ACL, IEC or compass own the rights to those income streams but there is potential there for a mutually beneficial deal to be done that keeps everyone happy.
Do not take the old model and apply it to the future ................ it wont be how it will be
What does amaze me is that so many people think should this admin move succeed or not that things will remain the same, that structures will remain unchanged, that new different agreements wont happen or are not possible. Look at it in different ways not the old way. Assume that ACL might want to get a deal that works, is secure, and stable from a new investor. Assume that the new investor actually knows the pitfalls and can approach the deal in a different way, is willing to work with not against ACL, and has money to invest in a future return (btw i think SISU have burnt all bridges so it wont work with them)
Take CCFC away from SISU and potentially there is a blank sheet on which to draw up rent agreements, income agreements etc. Yes it does mean that those income streams will have to be paid for/earnt/leased etc but surely when you buy into any business you are buying in to the income streams? ACL, IEC or compass own the rights to those income streams but there is potential there for a mutually beneficial deal to be done that keeps everyone happy.
Do not take the old model and apply it to the future ................ it wont be how it will be