Hopefully an end to this endless debate once and for all (1 Viewer)

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
"hopefully" :facepalm:
 

kevinleftpeg

New Member
I initially supported SISU at the outset, through blinded selfishness.

However, lets not forget that SISU are a ruthless money making operation that have monumentally screwed up when dabbling in Football.
They sold ALL our best Players for starters. Remember Dann / Wolfie / Westy etc. The rest of their fuck up's just bore me...........

I have zero sympathy for them & unfortunately, due to their own failings, no one else's, the Club will suffer & subsequently us fans.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
What does amaze me is that so many people think should this admin move succeed or not that things will remain the same, that structures will remain unchanged, that new different agreements wont happen or are not possible. Look at it in different ways not the old way. Assume that ACL might want to get a deal that works, is secure, and stable from a new investor. Assume that the new investor actually knows the pitfalls and can approach the deal in a different way, is willing to work with not against ACL, and has money to invest in a future return (btw i think SISU have burnt all bridges so it wont work with them)

Take CCFC away from SISU and potentially there is a blank sheet on which to draw up rent agreements, income agreements etc. Yes it does mean that those income streams will have to be paid for/earnt/leased etc but surely when you buy into any business you are buying in to the income streams? ACL, IEC or compass own the rights to those income streams but there is potential there for a mutually beneficial deal to be done that keeps everyone happy.

Do not take the old model and apply it to the future ................ it wont be how it will be
 
Last edited:

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
What does amaze me is that so many people think should this admin move succeed or not that things will remain the same, that structures will remain unchanged, that new different agreements wont happen or at not possible. Look at it in different ways not the old way. Assume that ACL might want to get a deal that works, is secure, and stable from a new investor. Assume that the new investor actually knows the pitfalls and can approach the deal in a different way, is willing to work with not against ACL, and has money to invest in a future return (btw i think SISU have burnt all bridges so it wont work with them)

Take CCFC away from SISU and potentially there is a blank sheet on which to draw up rent agreements, income agreements etc. Yes it does mean that those income streams will have to be paid for/earnt/leased etc but surely when you buy into any business you are buying in to the income streams? ACL, IEC or compass own the rights to those income streams but there is potential there for a mutually beneficial deal to be done that keeps everyone happy.

Do not take the old model and apply it to the future ................ it wont be how it will be

Completely agree
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
What does amaze me is that so many people think should this admin move succeed or not that things will remain the same, that structures will remain unchanged, that new different agreements wont happen or are not possible. Look at it in different ways not the old way. Assume that ACL might want to get a deal that works, is secure, and stable from a new investor. Assume that the new investor actually knows the pitfalls and can approach the deal in a different way, is willing to work with not against ACL, and has money to invest in a future return (btw i think SISU have burnt all bridges so it wont work with them)

Take CCFC away from SISU and potentially there is a blank sheet on which to draw up rent agreements, income agreements etc. Yes it does mean that those income streams will have to be paid for/earnt/leased etc but surely when you buy into any business you are buying in to the income streams? ACL, IEC or compass own the rights to those income streams but there is potential there for a mutually beneficial deal to be done that keeps everyone happy.

Do not take the old model and apply it to the future ................ it wont be how it will be

Finally a voice of reason! :claping hands:
 

Bluegloucester

New Member
What does amaze me is that so many people think should this admin move succeed or not that things will remain the same, that structures will remain unchanged, that new different agreements wont happen or are not possible. Look at it in different ways not the old way. Assume that ACL might want to get a deal that works, is secure, and stable from a new investor. Assume that the new investor actually knows the pitfalls and can approach the deal in a different way, is willing to work with not against ACL, and has money to invest in a future return (btw i think SISU have burnt all bridges so it wont work with them)

Take CCFC away from SISU and potentially there is a blank sheet on which to draw up rent agreements, income agreements etc. Yes it does mean that those income streams will have to be paid for/earnt/leased etc but surely when you buy into any business you are buying in to the income streams? ACL, IEC or compass own the rights to those income streams but there is potential there for a mutually beneficial deal to be done that keeps everyone happy.

Do not take the old model and apply it to the future ................ it wont be how it will be

Agree with you OSB, but maybe a new investor will look at buying the stadium and club.
 

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member
i am at the stage now- where i just want to go back to football. I dont even care if it is the Blue Square north. For the last 12 years or so all we have been concerned about is football finances,debt repayment, possible admin etc

All i want is to turn up on a saturday - a pie and a pint, and a game

I dont give 2 flying fucks about sisu/acl/joy sepalla/tim fisher/councillor mutton/ peter knatchbull huge one /waggott/hoffman etc etc
Also after watching us fall down the leagues - that is not the most important thing

the most important thing is we rid ourselves of all of this and just go back to a simple 2 hours on a saturday afternoon
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top