So could they for example attract another investor for example a Mike Ashley type or similar to be a major investor rather than out and out owner at the beginning at least, who also builds on investments then sells and moves on, I mention Ashley just as an example we know because that’s what he does and eventually did at Newcastle took time and I know Toon army fell out with him. Certainly no expert in the practicalities but looking at things I can’t see how we are at the moment being able to realistically contemplate the prem as a business model with its large wages, transfer fees etc wage budget alone could be over £40 million a year.contracts for the best players being three years plus. transfer fees millions.
Very depressing, this uplift in form and hope won’t last for ever
But O’Hara, Gyo, Sheaf and Hamer won’t be.Indeed, I’m not of the opinion a couple of loans will have got us to the play offs but if the season peters out to 14th/15th then next season STs are a hard sell
That's my understanding of the ground situation. The one positive element for Derby is their rent is deemed relatively low.Even though ownership has passed to Mel Morris' company, the leases that DCFC have to use the training ground and Pride Park are mortgaged to an investment company backed by a Caymen Islands fund. Whoever buys Derby would need to settle those charges first really and I suspect that's what is holding things up.
Having read the article, the key is the 61m of debt converted to shares. A chunk of the “debt” there was the Robinson loan (£30m?) and similar moved over from the original SISU deal I believe. Anyone know different? That money was to be repaid upon return to the PL but I can’t recall if there was a time limit on such.The mammoth sum Coventry City owners Sisu would need to walk away without loss - CoventryLive (coventrytelegraph.net)
I think this might have been what I was thinking of when I talked about SISU needing a figure much higher than the current debt plus assets. Obviously it's from the CET and several years old so possibly not relevant. However I still can't see the owners walking away without being paid a very, very substantial amount. I believe the Hoffman bids were rumoured to be in the region of £20m but that was inclusive of various performance related add-ons.
Just my opinion but
- why would anyone buy their high interest debt ? Surely you would only buy the assets. Thats a problem for SISU because someone buying all or part of the debt actually deflates the total amount they could take out over say the next 5 to 10 years because any such sale deal would seek to discount what the owners are owed and/or decrease annual interest due to investors
- i wouldnt think selling the assets and paying down their own debt from the proceeds is particularly palatable either, it does not give them maximum return
- is it even for sale, when SISU have not yet extracted worth from their investment. Never lose sight that it is all about maximising the investors return before the needs of the clubs supporters
I still think that the plan that commenced pre pandemic is to build value in to the playing squads, which will mean high value players being sold regularly, SISU will take a slice each year of those sales to pay down the accumulating interest and the capital they have put in to Otium, once that pay down is done then that is when they could look to sell a largely debt free football club with reasonably highly valued playing squad. That way they will maximise the return on revenue and capital investment in Otium.
However SBS&L have 28m owed to them by Otium (but not secured) so that will need paying down too. So that complicates things and could easily delay timescales to get part or all of that settled too if they choose. They are not going to be walking away from those debts debts in Otium & SBS&L in a rush to sell, and no one in their right mind would take the debt on.
Dont forget about the preference shares both ARVO & SBS&L own that are accruing something like 9% dividends once their are distributable profits too.
Also dont forget, increased value to the club, accruing or paying interest results in SISU itself taking a slice from its investors as investment managers of the relevant investment funds
They are not putting money in to the club each year as far as we know so they are not exactly struggling with it or pressured to sell in that sense. Between 2018 accounts and 2020 accounts their net investment was £36k hardly massive sums. 2021 & 2022 might be different but not sure yet. If they have put funds in they will be looking to extract those emergency funds asap
They have not been able to milk the club to get their money back (except in 2019 when they took out 1.7m - had to pay back in 2020) ....... but they will
How much would a mid championship debt free football club be worth ? presently they wouldn't look at anything below £50m for the club in that position imo............... but it is not for sale for a while yet. But they will eventually have taken much more than that in total if it all goes to plan in the way i believe
Billionaire......That website is fucking hilarious
What sort of timescales are we talking here? Slicing off player profits on current form would take decades.
About 50 years reading that! Being stuck with SISU as owners for the rest of my lifetime isn't a depressing thought at all.What sort of timescales are we talking here? Slicing off player profits on current form would take decades.
Billionaire......
About 50 years reading that! Being stuck with SISU as owners for the rest of my lifetime isn't a depressing thought at all.
Having read all that, I’ll repeat my earlier assertions:Just my opinion but
- why would anyone buy their high interest debt ? Surely you would only buy the assets. Thats a problem for SISU because someone buying all or part of the debt actually deflates the total amount they could take out over say the next 5 to 10 years because any such sale deal would seek to discount what the owners are owed and/or decrease annual interest due to investors
- i wouldnt think selling the assets and paying down their own debt from the proceeds is particularly palatable either, it does not give them maximum return
- is it even for sale, when SISU have not yet extracted worth from their investment. Never lose sight that it is all about maximising the investors return before the needs of the clubs supporters
I still think that the plan that commenced pre pandemic is to build value in to the playing squads, which will mean high value players being sold regularly, SISU will take a slice each year of those sales to pay down the accumulating interest and the capital they have put in to Otium, once that pay down is done then that is when they could look to sell a largely debt free football club with reasonably highly valued playing squad. That way they will maximise the return on revenue and capital investment in Otium.
However SBS&L have 28m owed to them by Otium (but not secured) so that will need paying down too. So that complicates things and could easily delay timescales to get part or all of that settled too if they choose. They are not going to be walking away from those debts debts in Otium & SBS&L in a rush to sell, and no one in their right mind would take the debt on.
Dont forget about the preference shares both ARVO & SBS&L own that are accruing something like 9% dividends once their are distributable profits too.
Also dont forget, increased value to the club, accruing or paying interest results in SISU itself taking a slice from its investors as investment managers of the relevant investment funds
They are not putting money in to the club each year as far as we know so they are not exactly struggling with it or pressured to sell in that sense. Between 2018 accounts and 2020 accounts their net investment was £36k hardly massive sums. 2021 & 2022 might be different but not sure yet. If they have put funds in they will be looking to extract those emergency funds asap
They have not been able to milk the club to get their money back (except in 2019 when they took out 1.7m - had to pay back in 2020) ....... but they will
How much would a mid championship debt free football club be worth ? presently they wouldn't look at anything below £50m for the club in that position imo............... but it is not for sale for a while yet. But they will eventually have taken much more than that in total if it all goes to plan in the way i believe
its startedTea & Busquets OUT!
Yeah i don't think £60m is a bad guess (and lets face it we're all guessing here as SISU would have lot's of info we're never going to see when it comes to setting a price they'd take). The worst part of all this for me is that the figure required for a change of ownership appears prohibitive to any sensible investor coming in for us. You never know, but i fear they'd want so much money as to make it highly unlikely to find a buyer. As osb details in his posts they could, in theory, continue to run us in the same way for quite some time yet with no real downside to themselves....so they aren't going to sell us in a hurry or on the cheap.Having read the article, the key is the 61m of debt converted to shares. A chunk of the “debt” there was the Robinson loan (£30m?) and similar moved over from the original SISU deal I believe. Anyone know different? That money was to be repaid upon return to the PL but I can’t recall if there was a time limit on such.
Whether or not that 61m is “real” liability now I don’t know.
I’ll stick to 60m they need to walk away.
That website is fucking hilarious
Coventry City: Gary Hoffman consortium has third offer rejected
The consortium of Coventry businessmen has made three bids to buy the Sky Blues off the London hedge fund ownerswww.coventrytelegraph.net
If the above is to be believed, his third/highest bid was nothing like some of the numbers mentioned in this thread.
Contacts such as Dale EvansI’m sure they are still around and probably know a lot more than we do GH will certainly know contacts but it’s been very quiet from that consortium for ages.
To avoid a painful 12 page new song thread We can only get this to work if we use abbreviations and remove the &Tea & Busquets OUT!
Perhaps you could set up a BrightonSkyBlue-Covkid1968#-Grendel consortium to get rid of him?To avoid a painful 12 page new song thread We can only get this to work if we use abbreviations and remove the &
We want TB out say we want TB out
I think we’re stuck with our Joy!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?