Ok we heard Tim Fisher say the club is not for sale. But if a bid came in how much would it take for them to take note?
Im presuming you would be buying Ryton and the players and anything else they own.
Would they take £5 million?
Or would it be closer to £10 million?
Thoughts?
An interesting question, does not make any sense why they are staying, why not just take what they can and walk a the outlay will just keep getting bigger ad bigger.
they bid 20m for limited (can tell this by the pence in the pound offer to creditors)
i imagine this is around their price at the minute
Everyone has a price, including the protesters! It isn't the Ricoh because it's NEVER EVER FELT LIKE HOME TO ME!
Far too many different reasons being put forward and even if an agreement was reached to return ALL those who want to choose our owners would be starting yet another campaign, SISI OUT!
They're having a laugh IMHO!
no, he always talks shite.Is there a version of that that makes sense?
come on down Tim fisher.Everyone has a price, including the protesters! It isn't the Ricoh because it's NEVER EVER FELT LIKE HOME TO ME!
Far too many different reasons being put forward and even if an agreement was reached to return ALL those who want to choose our owners would be starting yet another campaign, SISI OUT!
They're having a laugh IMHO!
I raised this subject when Haskell was on the scene. SISU have invested some 30m net approximately. They will not leave while that kind of money is owed to them. They need to get close to recouping it and holding onto the club is their best option due to relegation. They need to improve the clubs stature and earnings again. Potentially it's huge but currently not.
So why did Haskell not approach them and offer a figure in this region? He also had the councils ear to development around the stadium site (surely his biggest prize and route of his interest?) yet he failed to do so. I think the answer is in his previous attempts at other clubs tbh and the rather ludicrously fantasist in Joe Elliot and the rather foolish banker who writes things on fag packets and then offers loans to pay SISU's rent for a fee? Hmmm.
Seems to me all these greedy bastards were only interested in getting their dirty hands on it cheap through admin and the council/ACL thought they could pull this off. SISU played hard ball and like a wounded animal fought back. Tell me are any of these groups worthy of our trust? I think not.
That was the amount of real money OSB reckoned SISU had put into CCFC.
The accounts of SBSL show total loans from SISU funds amounting to around £30-35m as of mid 2011. Fast forward two years on, it's anyone's guess as to the scale of the loans now however considering the club's likely losses over this time I would expect to stand at no greater than £45m.
I seem to remember you making me do extra work BSB after my first blog post to show it wasn't £30 million of hard currency. The debt outstanding at May 2011 was £30m. But according to cashflow statements, it was nearer to £20million.
I reckon around £60 million. Roughly based on £50 million they have pumped in and a better than 5% return they will have promised as a return to the investors. For that you would get a business with no revenue streams, massive outgoings, no assets and little goodwill! Would you really buy it?
Would that have been due to the ProZone sale? It's a long time since I looked at those accounts so not surprised my numbers are a bit off.
They will have invested around £26 by now.
If that's all they've invested, I'll give em 50 quid if they fuck off now!
Question.
Is the difference between amounts invested and 'debt', and the amount set to be written off in any exit from administration, linked to any contingent liabilities owed to former directors/owners, or is that barking up the wrong conspiracy tree?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?