Huw edwards (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Evo1883
- Start date
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Yep epedemic
And why if you admit and haven’t distributed you’re likely to get non custodial
Doesn’t condone it of course
And why if you admit and haven’t distributed you’re likely to get non custodial
Doesn’t condone it of course
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
I can understand that though. What I struggle with is the bloke distributing, who has previous, only getting a suspended too. He clearly hasn't learned anything from his past!
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
NPCC report highlights the shocking scale of child sexual abuse in the UK and the need for all of us to play our part in prevention. - Lucy Faithfull Foundation
Today’s report from the National Police Chiefs’ Council is a sobering reminder of the realities of child sexual abuse in the UK. According to today’s figures, there were 107,000 recorded child sexual abuse offences in 2022. Responding, Deborah Denis, CEO of the Lucy Faithfull Foundation, said...
I’m sorry I had to find out due to something happening to us
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
350,000 to 750,000 is just astonishing numbers.
What does that entail though? It can't be numbers on the SOR. Is it just people that have have self reported as having an interest and not taken action on it extrapolated out to the population?
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
The 2022 link is offences I think or charges
It’s increased astronomically
SomersetSB
Well-Known Member
Starmer should step in and find him a cell, but he hasn’t got the balls, how the hell has he avoided a jail term? There’s plenty of spaces now!!
Last edited:
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Not excusing his behaviour but he’s lost his career, reputation, probably friends and family. Not sure what imprisoning someone adds to the punishment.
absolutely take the point of deterrent and victim having been damaged and risk of reoffending but would imagine he’s on the sex offenders register for a period of time
Marty
Well-Known Member
Keeps the streets safe from a nonce, Pete. Thats what they're there for, keep the scum locked away.
JAM See
Well-Known Member
He's fucked.
The chance of recidivism is close to zero.
No need to house him on the public dollar.
There will be an interview with a tabloid in the next year or so though.
Nick
Administrator
Need spaces for people posting online, let the nonces and cunts carrying knives crack on though.
Ring Of Steel
Well-Known Member
He was actually classified by psychologists & pre-sentence experts as ‘medium risk’, with the comment that if he was sent/ saw similar images then he could well reoffend.
With this in mind it is categorically not true to say the chance of recidivism is close to zero.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Have a read he voluntarily stopped receiving any more pictures before the police caught up with him
Not excusing his behaviour just laying out the evidence
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Hence why he is on the sex offender register for 7 years and has received a suspended prison sentence
rob9872
Well-Known Member
The councillors wife deleted her post and apologised before the police contacted her, yet most want her hung! I did tell myself I wouldn't get involved on this when I saw the sentence as I knew everyone would be frothing relating it to the riots. They're not at all linked but equally can understand the outrage. I think in this climate it was a bit of an own goal to have not insisted on at least a small custodial.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
She plead guilty. Did you want the court to disagree?
Marty
Well-Known Member
So that makes it ok then? He's a sick pervert that needs locking away.
rob9872
Well-Known Member
So did Huw. My point was to Pete, whose caveat was that he'd stopped.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
And I’m sure her regret will be reflected in her sentencing. I don’t agree with Pete and think Edward’s should be in prison, but I think he was talking to the fact he’s stopped before he was caught.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Where did I say it makes it ok
He’s fucked up and lost everything and most would say he deserved too
rob9872
Well-Known Member
Good question actually. With other addictions you would say stop all together. Suppressing all urges is possibly more damaging and comes with greater risk.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
It’s not a political decision though it’s a judiciary and I have huge problems with someone being imprisoned for using words
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Have a look at lucy faithful foundation and you can see
You recognise where the offending behaviour arose and set up mechanisms to ensure that you don’t repeat the behaviour
Lucy Faithfull Foundation - Preventing child sexual abuse
Lucy Faithfull Foundation works to protect children by working with people who pose a risk and diverting them from causing harm.
There maybe people on here who are getting involved in activity that they can’t control or see a way out. This is a good first step to take
The mistake many of you make is that it could never happen to you or any of your friends and the reality is it does and it could
Tommo1993
Well-Known Member
It sounds like one of those dogdy “asking for a mate…” things. So I wondered if I should even ask.
But couldn’t think of what would go on. It’s not something like drugs, alcohol, eating disorders etc. I’m flummoxed.
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
I’d imagine it’s more like a compulsion, so effectively they can’t be.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
It’s very like that for some if not many that offend. It’s an addiction that drags someone deeper and deeper down through porn to extreme porn to criminality and unless there is a way out ends in arrest charge and lives destroyed
Ring Of Steel
Well-Known Member
In some cases it can. Usually it’s when someone totally loses the plot- mental illness, manic depression etc, and they end up doing things that they formerly had zero interest in to fill some kind of void. In those cases rehabilitation is possible, it’s the ones who always had that type of ‘interest’ that can effectively never be rehabilitated.
in this case Edwards asked to stop receiving stuff, if he was a genuine paedophile he’d never have done that, because as you say it’s a compulsion.
I’m not sticking up for him either.
Marty
Well-Known Member
You seems to be almost weirdly defending him, it's ok everyone, he stopped before he was caught and he hasn't lost everything, he hasn't lost his freedom.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
I think the evidence suggests that they don’t lose the attraction but can absolutely be able to take steps to recognise that what they want to do is wrong and not do it
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
ok like much on here attempting nuance means you condone what he’s done ok
Grendel
Well-Known Member
He has freedom and a massive salary paid by the BBC after his guilty plea
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Do you know if he’s on a sexual harm prevention order and do you know what being on the sex offenders register entails?
but yes he is not imprisoned I wouldn’t go so far as freedom
Was he not disciplined for gross misconduct? Or just suspended pending court case?
I’ve not read that
Should someone who stops offending before being caught, pleads guilty and shows remorse be treated differently to someone who hasn’t done those things?