Nick
Administrator
That header Chaplin missed I'd have taken the ball and the net just to make sure.
That header Chaplin missed I'd have taken the ball and the net just to make sure.I swear some of us would have taken some of those chances and done a better job from the spot at Fleetwood. Granted, I would have been gasping for air after a minute
No, it's not effective. It's such fine margins though.
I don't think we are a bad team at all. Put McNulty in there as the one change and we would surely be in the playoffs.
How long can "not far off" go on for though?
Dilutional.No, it's not effective. It's such fine margins though.
I don't think we are a bad team at all. Put McNulty in there as the one change and we would surely be in the playoffs.
No, it's not effective. It's such fine margins though.
I don't think we are a bad team at all. Put McNulty in there as the one change and we would surely be in the playoffs.
Why?Delusional
Why?
We have missed open goals. McNulty would clearly have knocked most of them in. If so, we would have at least 9 more points.
It's the final ball, the missing of fabulous chances and dithering in the penalty area that has let us down.
We are one good striker away from having a decent team.
Nowt delusional about it.
I agree. We just need a striker in form. Chaplin is young and still has time to come good
HE’S HAD 5 MONTHS FFS ...m8
He’s a kid. He’s 21 years old.
Why?
We have missed open goals. McNulty would clearly have knocked most of them in. If so, we would have at least 9 more points.
It's the final ball, the missing of fabulous chances and dithering in the penalty area that has let us down.
We are one good striker away from having a decent team.
Nowt delusional about it.
Nope. I think you are delusional.Everyone team can make the same comments - why we haven’t had points. Mcnulty has a patchy record outside of league two.
Our midfield is often over run, the whole left side poor and we concede too easily
Yes it’s delusional
Course they have, it was embarrassing that it even went to them.Dubious goals committee have given Thomas the goal against Wimbledon
Tbf I don't care who they give it too dont care who scores.Dubious goals committee have given Thomas the goal against Wimbledon
Dubious goals committee have given Thomas the goal against Wimbledon
There wasn't any doubt from the moment it went in.Don't get it.
Did at first, because Chaplin clearly claimed it and it looked like he maybe did get a toe end on it, but having looked at the slow mo it appears to go past him.
If there is any doubt the goal has to go to Thomas surely.
There was with me.There wasn't any doubt from the moment it went in.
It's embarrassing.
Does it even matter?It was never Chapin's goal, not now,not ever! anyone who thought otherwise, may i suggest Specsavers..
Yeah. It's not that important in the grand scheme of things.Does it even matter?
Now if he was claiming 4 or 5 goals then maybe but 1 who cares.
Probably his team mates.Does it even matter?
Now if he was claiming 4 or 5 goals then maybe but 1 who cares.
Nope. I think you are delusional.
You seem to be saying that a decent striker would also be missing all those open goals.
Any decent, in form striker would be putting those JCH, Chaplin, Hiwula and Bakayoko sitters away.
That alone would have us with at least 9 more points. At least.
If we were in the playoffs right now would you still be saying we are a poor side?
You are the one that is delusional unfortunately.
We are not all far off being a decent side in this league.
I'm not saying we are a playoff side, but clearly any striker worth his salt would have been putting many of those gilt-edged chances away.
We should have so many points under our belts right now.
As soon as a striker starts putting those chances away you watch us climb the table.
There is though of course the notion that maybe the strikers just aren't good enough at all anyway and will keep missing.
That happens and we WILL be in trouble.
We have been competitive pretty much all season.You can apply your argument to the games we have won that we were lucky to get points in.
In the end the table doesn’t lie and the current run of 17 doesn’t either
We have worse form than with Slade the last 17 games. Is that competitive?We have been competitive pretty much all season.
There has been many a year where we have looked a very poor second and struggled in games.
This season we have dominated a number of teams but failed to polish them off.
It's such small margins and we all know it shouldn't be that run of 17 games. We definitely should have had more wins on the board.
You can apply your argument to the games we have won that we were lucky to get points in.
In the end the table doesn’t lie and the current run of 17 doesn’t either
Competitive in games I mean. Not talking about results.We have worse form than with Slade the last 17 games. Is that competitive?
Doesn't even out of you've got crap strikers though.I tend to agree, as the counter argument doesn’t take in to account how many ‘sitters’ our opponents have missed, or in which games their top scoring striker didn’t play...or indeed, when our defence and Burge made (unusually) good plays. Over the course of the season, everything tends to even out and the general pattern dictates our position.
We have worse form than with Slade the last 17 games. Is that competitive?
Doesn't even out of you've got crap strikers though.
I don't think it was that good a display but we won which is all that mattersAnother decent display and got what we deserved today. People are going to have to wait at least another week I suspect
We have worse form than with Slade the last 17 games. Is that competitive?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?