Brylowes
Well-Known Member
And yet he was privy to sensitive information, around financial direction and decisionWasn't even that much!
The salary was a joke - even I earn more!
making at the highest levels of the club
And yet he was privy to sensitive information, around financial direction and decisionWasn't even that much!
The salary was a joke - even I earn more!
And yet he was privy to sensitive information, around financial direction and decision
making at the highest levels of the club
Simon is quite funny really, trotted out the old line that the CCFC offer conditional and Wasps unconditional almost straight away. He definitely picked up that line off here, probably from italia or one of the other goons.Look on twitter. You've got one person who is in a position where they would have seen what was happening saying one thing happened and the local paper basically jumping up and down saying no it didn't.
He's stated he has documents showing it to be true. Same response from the paper.
If the cleaner of the toilets in the east stand leaves her job and releases a statement ,
as long as she says what the gang want to hear it will be swallowed whole.
Torch even has a quote from KC at the bottom of every post like it was said by
Churchill or something. LOL
Simon is quite funny really, trotted out the old line that the CCFC offer conditional and Wasps unconditional almost straight away. He definitely picked up that line off here, probably from italia or one of the other goons.
If the cleaner of the toilets in the east stand leaves her job and releases a statement ,
as long as she says what the gang want to hear it will be swallowed whole.
Torch even has a quote from KC at the bottom of every post like it was said by
Churchill or something. LOL
Not at all, I'm sure there's admin staff, etc at the club that have seen the documents when they photocopied, filed them, etc.Not unlikely, either.
Not at all, I'm sure there's admin staff, etc at the club that have seen the documents when they photocopied, filed them, etc.
If the cleaner of the toilets in the east stand leaves her job and releases a statement ,
as long as she says what the gang want to hear it will be swallowed whole.
Torch even has a quote from KC at the bottom of every post like it was said by
Churchill or something. LOL
Calm down, soft lad. Where did I say it was you. And you know it happens.Clearly you haven't read some of my other posts - I take a balanced view, and only starting posting on here again today due to the disgrace that is the Higgs Centre Wasps training ground revelation
Is it time to leave Myopialand again?
The thing that gets me at the minute is every time the club release a statement it's scrutinised to the enth degree by the relevant contributors and their rags and pulled to pieces with pros and cons, he said she said and even video comment now. When is the same forensic examination of the council going to happen? Idiots like Lucas, Muton and Maton have some serious questions answer on their conduct for starters.
I would think he's doing as he's told, putting out a flurry of (as of now ) unsubstantiatedAs Crowley I assume is moving to alternative employment do you think it's likely he'd lie on social media?
I would think he's doing as he's told, putting out a flurry of (as of now ) unsubstantiated
Rumours before disappearing into the sunset.
Of course if he can back it up with facts, I will not only say I was wrong, I will also say he
was underpaid for the executive position he held at the club.
But is the same standard being applied to everyone or just when its a story that would put CCFC in a positive light?
I would think he's doing as he's told, putting out a flurry of (as of now ) unsubstantiated
Rumours before disappearing into the sunset.
Of course if he can back it up with facts, I will not only say I was wrong, I will also say he
was underpaid for the executive position he held at the club.
Yes, we have ethics comittees and a longwinded JR where the council have had their internal emails and decisions scrutinised. It would be great to scrutinise this offer. So where is it?
Ah the Ethics Committee..
"Person X has admitted they forgot to do something they had to do, but we are clearing him of failing to do something they had to do"
"Person X has done something that breaks the code of conduct, so we are going to change the code of conduct"
What's with all the scouse talk Torch La!Calm down, soft lad. Where did I say it was you. And you know it happens.
Yes, we have ethics comittees and a longwinded JR where the council have had their internal emails and decisions scrutinised. It would be great to scrutinise this offer. So where is it?
Yes, we have ethics comittees and a longwinded JR where the council have had their internal emails and decisions scrutinised. It would be great to scrutinise this offer. So where is it?
I thought that , must be re-runs of Brookside! Soft ladWhat's with all the scouse talk Torch La!
No I think he's doing his job, would help if he would back it up,after all it's well known youSo is he lying in your opinion?
Where's the minutes of the council meetings that discussed the sale of the Ricoh?
Where's the details of the sale of ACL to Wasps?
It would be great to scrutinise these documents.
Where are they?
Bit fxxcking late then isn't he.Head of Communications isn't he?
Simon is quite funny really, trotted out the old line that the CCFC offer conditional and Wasps unconditional almost straight away. He definitely picked up that line off here, probably from italia or one of the other goons.
Where's the minutes of the council meetings that discussed the sale of the Ricoh?
Where's the details of the sale of ACL to Wasps?
It would be great to scrutinise these documents.
Where are they?
I thought we were talking about Kieran's offer evidence.... Sorry.
What a whitewash that was. Council investigate Council and find Council didn't do anything wrong. Substitute Council for SISU and I'm sure Martcov wouldn't be quite so accommodating.
That's the point though. We won't be seeing any internal memos or emails from Joy's firm. As ML said SISU are not a "dodgy hedge fund". So there you are, SISU didn't do anything wrong either.
They aren't a council, so that's probably why?
Any idea what the conditions were?