skybluebeduff
Well-Known Member
He must of meant in the virtual world, because from the beginning of 2016, we never contested at all under Mowbray.
He must of meant in the virtual world, because from the beginning of 2016, we never contested at all under Mowbray.under mowbray we contested every game
.... did we?
He must of meant in the virtual world, because from the beginning of 2016, we never contested at all under Mowbray.
yes we did. alot of games were draws or narrow defeats under mowbray. thats contesting
as already mentioned they didnt lose alot of them and the defeats were narrow. thats contesting. no guessing required.Well they turned up for the games at least. Guess that's contesting.
as already mentioned they didnt lose alot of them and the defeats were narrow. thats contesting. no guessing required.
Do you think we played well in those games?
i think we contested them
aka = we took part in the contest. But were found out to be inadequate.
Why the "Thai"? Do you have some info on the potential buyers?so Slade till June
if there was a new investor - what pay off do you think that would involve - not a lot
And if Malaka has real news, and not trying to Thai us in knots -then a 50k pay off would not be the make or break of the deal
In fact they may be happier having somebody in now to steady the ship
He must of meant in the virtual world, because from the beginning of 2016, we never contested at all under Mowbray.
aka we took part in the contest and either didnt lose or lost by 1 goal margins. no blowouts
A bit like Triggers broom??The new broom would still have the same hand controlling it, SISU have to go.
Same as thorn in the championship. That's ok then
I don't believe those numbers in the accounts come close to the salaries of the team, a few coaches and backroom staff - we must be paying a big chunk somewhere else in "salaries" . Otherwise, as you say, it doesn't add up. The club breaks even; even after paying £x for consultancy is my guess.
My thoughts exactly. The staff costs number in the accounts includes money being paid out to SISU and directors. Yes I know the accounts are audited but having worked as an auditor I know that many companies break the rules without penalty.
Which money is going to SISU from staff costs?
The sadness is due to the fact that any appointment, good or bad means that it is less likely Sisu will go.With regard to Russel Slade, he has always seemed like a good chap. Liked his comments about fans having the right to protest after our game at Charlton. However I think he is on to a hiding to nothing here and any appointment is simply papering over the cracks.Yes, it is a good appointment so no need to be "sad".
What is his job then if it is not what he says it is?He's no proof but he knows how it works. Nudge, nudge, wink, wink. Repeat it a few times and it's a new "fact".
What is his job then if it is not what he says it is?
The sadness is due to the fact that any appointment, good or bad means that it is less likely Sisu will go.With regard to Russel Slade, he has always seemed like a good chap. Liked his comments about fans having the right to protest after our game at Charlton. However I think he is on to a hiding to nothing here and any appointment is simply papering over the cracks.
Did he say that's what your beloved sisu are doing?I don't care if he's the greatest accountant on earth. The accounts say what they say. There is zero proof they have been tampered with or doctored in any way. Just ammo for the conspiracy theorists, I suppose.
Did he say that's what your beloved sisu are doing?
It is if they are giving themselves loads of money and saying it's staff costs.Did he say that's what your beloved sisu are doing?
Goes for you too nick, its quite clear. Did he say that's what sisu are doing?It is if they are giving themselves loads of money and saying it's staff costs.
Beloved ha
Goes for you too nick, its quite clear. Did he say that's what sisu are doing?
Ok I read it again.....what am I supposed to be seeing? He has not insulted your sisu thereI'm sure you can read, look at his post.
Ok I read it again.....what am I supposed to be seeing? He has not insulted your sisu there
Goes for you too nick, its quite clear. Did he say that's what sisu are doing?
Who made what up?Erm, yes.
Still, you can still keep saying "your sisu" and petty shit because people are questioning something that somebody has made up.
No, they have you!I don't have a SISU.
I agree, I think it's a decent appointment, I also think you will be one of, if not the firstYes, it is a good appointment so no need to be "sad".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?