Fergusons_Beard
Well-Known Member
This article brings up several issues.
Number one it’s bollocks about needing huge players to win games in this league. McNulty and Doyle are good enough and they ain’t big physical specimens.
Number 2 Most successful teams have mixture of young guns and experienced heads. Too much of either usually leads to disaster.
Number 3-Its mostly down to style of play.
If you have huge physical players then playing a technical, passing game is not going to cut it. Hence why Wycombe and Lincoln play the style they do.
What’s worrying and something I can’t understand is when teams like City play hoof ball when they clearly haven’t the players to play in this style.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Number one it’s bollocks about needing huge players to win games in this league. McNulty and Doyle are good enough and they ain’t big physical specimens.
Number 2 Most successful teams have mixture of young guns and experienced heads. Too much of either usually leads to disaster.
Number 3-Its mostly down to style of play.
If you have huge physical players then playing a technical, passing game is not going to cut it. Hence why Wycombe and Lincoln play the style they do.
What’s worrying and something I can’t understand is when teams like City play hoof ball when they clearly haven’t the players to play in this style.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro