Pardon my ignorance who is this ?
It’s moreIt feels to me like the budget is quite substantially lower than last year.
At the moment though it doesn’t look like we have spent more than last season, looks less to me not sure which budget Sheaf came out of but with the Hamer and Walker fees together they were about £2million then there was a bit for Reid and Taveres later. At the minute fee wise I think we have only paid money for Gyokeres.It’s more
At the moment though it doesn’t look like we have spent more than last season, looks less to me not sure which budget Sheaf came out of but with the Hamer and Walker fees together they were about £2million then there was a bit for Reid and Taveres later. At the minute fee wise I think we have only paid money for Gyokeres.
1 million quid on wankhorn's wages too. Cheers @shmmeeeAt the moment though it doesn’t look like we have spent more than last season, looks less to me not sure which budget Sheaf came out of but with the Hamer and Walker fees together they were about £2million then there was a bit for Reid and Taveres later. At the minute fee wise I think we have only paid money for Gyokeres.
Is it ? Who told you that ?1 million quid on wankhorn's wages too. Cheers @shmmeee
Or perhaps we are just valuing our assets a bit more realistically now. Hopefully the days of us selling our best players for peanuts have gone?And we haven’t sold anyone…”the model” fails at the first hurdle if there’s nobody interested in our players.
I get that, this is the first season for a while where we haven’t sold a player for a decent fee.And we haven’t sold anyone…”the model” fails at the first hurdle if there’s nobody interested in our players.
Is it ? Who told you that ?
Ok. Do you remember Derby paid 5 millon quid for him a few years ago, he'd have been a very high earner and that;s common knowledge. I'd hazard a guess he's taken a signifigant pay cut and will be on between 5-10 grand a week, so lets say 7.5 grand and keep things nice. £7500 a week multiplied by the 104 weeks of his contract gives you a total of £780000 - not too shy of a million quid. No campaign here pal, chill out.How do you know what the players contract is? Or does it just fit your campaign?
he's on a 2 year contract you daft c**tThat's just over 19k a week, doubt we are paying that much
dont listen to that dickhead. He's on a 2 year contract. 10k a week makes the million quidWe can't be paying waghorn 19,000 weekly no chance.it does feel like we spent more last season.
I suspect it is 10k a week and I hope for that he delivers as that will make him a top end earner. I think people in the thread are looking at year on year costs not 2 year liabilities.dont listen to that dickhead. He's on a 2 year contract. 10k a week makes the million quid
12K a week minimumI suspect it is 10k a week and I hope for that he delivers as that will make him a top end earner. I think people in the thread are looking at year on year costs not 2 year liabilities.
Also decent signing on fees with free transfersIt’s not just money spent, it’s wages too. Moore and Waghorn will be on relatively large wages compared to those they replaced
Well fool them as we cant just stop paying him after a fucking year can we???!!!I suspect it is 10k a week and I hope for that he delivers as that will make him a top end earner. I think people in the thread are looking at year on year costs not 2 year liabilities.
I forgot we had you who was ITK12K a week minimumdefo highest earner
How is hopeful to lose your best player or one of your other brightest prospects? Bizarre logic.
Yes it's utterly stupid, you're talking about signings that are likely back up to a first 11 here. It's like selling your boiler to buy more radiatorsOnly hope of having enough money to make some signings. Not win the fucking league you lemon.
Yes it's utterly stupid, you're talking about signings that are likely back up to a first 11 here. It's like selling your boiler to buy more radiators
Only hope of having enough money to make some signings. Not win the fucking league you lemon.
It is a bit of a shit analogy yesIm saying there’s no money unless we sell and we only have two players we could sell. That’s it.
Calm down. No one is advocating selling anyone.
Also that’s the worst analogy I’ve seen on here and I’ve been responsible for some belters. Good job
Kelvin Wilson. In our relegation from league one season Mowbray spent the entire summer chasing this one player and didn’t go for anyone else. He’d just left a contract on 25k a week at Forest - was never going to drop down to what we were offering
Yeah that boiler and radiator analogy was all wrong. To me, it’s more like turning up the thermostat using the dial in the kitchen, only to find that the window in the back bedroom has been left open and the lagging on the pipes in the outside bog has come away, causing condensation and some persistent mould around the cistern.It is a bit of a shit analogy yes
Foundations of a Chaplin thread this oneSo does the whole Clarke-Salter deal now look unlikely now?
Marosi was sold for a presumably modest u disclosed fee.And we haven’t sold anyone…”the model” fails at the first hurdle if there’s nobody interested in our players.
Didn’t someone say Shrewsbury’s biggest transfer fee was 100kMarosi was sold for a presumably modest u disclosed fee.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?