james mckpake tweet (1 Viewer)

[wingy]

This is another long-running myth.

Thorn was installed as a caretaker manager - a natural course of events after a sacking. Fans enjoyed his initial results and football, liked Thorn the man, called him The Godfather, wanted him to be the permanent manager. SISU obliged.

There is nothing to suggest he was only given the job full-time because he was cheap. Managers do not require a transfer fee and are on lower wages than any player; it wouldn't require much financial shuffling to bring in an outside man.

Yep they could possibly ditch Labovitch form the payroll now ,as the political /PR battle is all but done with the council ,that would be a significant sum IMO.

 

---

[Gint11]

What facts? McPake was a good, hard-working CB, who was mistreated by the club, and still happy to return, but fair play to him for telling the club where to go and getting off the sinking HMS CCFC

Hard working is a must for the wages they earn. He was too injury prone and too small for a centre half. Not good enough.

 

[ccfclinney]

there are many tweets that suggets thorn and mckpake had a bust up very early in including :

"And I've already explained my Cov ones.Just unfortunate. No1 wanted2 do well for that great club more than me! #theresurfacts"

"Time was up when ur so called manager judged me after 2 games after being out with a broken back!"

Was this the kind of personal thorn wanted out and got out, but still unrest within the camp and didnt play for him any longer. billy davies for me usually only goes where the money is though .

 

[Nick]

Thorn didnt like Deegan either I dont think.

 

[stringyb92]

He replied to my tweet. You can definatly tell there was unrest between him and Thorn