Transfer Rumour January transfer window (24 Viewers)

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Be a bit strange for doug to upset lampard on his very first transfer window

Going to support Doug here actually. Lampard was hired on the understanding he could get more from what we’ve got and so far he hasn’t. Any loan unless it’s followed up with a season long isn’t going to be much use and isn’t going to be the difference between us going down or staying up. Sheaf is back in five weeks or so and there will be a rebuild in the summer.

As a fan I want a loan in, as a pragmatist it’s probably a waste of cash.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Going to support Doug here actually. Lampard was hired on the understanding he could get more from what we’ve got and so far he hasn’t. Any loan unless it’s followed up with a season long isn’t going to be much use and isn’t going to be the difference between us going down or staying up. Sheaf is back in five weeks or so and there will be a rebuild in the summer.

As a fan I want a loan in, as a pragmatist it’s probably a waste of cash.
Not really, a good end to the season could make a huge difference in season ticket sales.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
At this point I’d take 3 loans to get us over the line with the season.

With MVE, sheaf and maybe Wright going in the summer we need to start lining up deals for the £30m+ tht we get from it
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Maybe Lampard thinks different, but to your other point I'd also suggest it would put us in pole position to get back for next season.

Just trying to think like Doug here (*cough* ciddy ciddy), if he’s expecting a big rebuild then maybe wants no loans again next season.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Just trying to think like Doug here (*cough* ciddy ciddy), if he’s expecting a big rebuild then maybe wants no loans again next season.
We'll find out how true the no loans thing is soon enough I suppose. Tbh I'm not against owning your players and some loans definitely seem to be done almost for the sake of it, but we should be pursuing them if they make sense of course.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
We had this for 5+ years w Robins (and before that with Presley). People claimed he was surely about to walk as Sisu wouldn’t put their hands in their pockets/ kept selling the family silver/ wouldn’t give Carl Baker a new contract….
Man I loved the first Presley year. Thought it was brilliant and he’d get us up the league. Only to get sacked after losing to Worcester.
 

Deity

Well-Known Member
If we are to take on loans then I think they have to be pass certain criteria for me …

1) Will they start most matches when fit ?
2) is it possible to sign them in the summer either perm or on a season long loan if they are successful with us
3) the cost of the loan ( fee / wages ) cannot impact our summer budget materially.
4) will they add some experience that will really help the younger players reach their potential.

If you can tick at least 2 of them then why bother ?
 

blunted

Well-Known Member
I want him to be good, I'm a big advocate of giving players time and I like to think I'm good at seeing green shoots in new players I expect to come good. Not seeing it with him I'm afraid, be tempted to cut our losses as long as its not too much.
Seen too many players join and are pants only to end up as heroes. Chris Cattlin and Cyrille Regis are two that come to mind. BTA was top scorer for West Brom in a very defensive counter attacking side. All our strikers are struggling mainly due to the lack of quality balls from midfield or even on the turnover from opposition corners. Pace is BTAs big asset. Teams sit deep against us, so we need to find better ways to get our strikers more involved.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Keep hearing about this loan that didn't materialise but very sceptical to be honest. Where did that information come from?

Austin spoke about loans at the forum and why they were problematic but never mentioned we'd had one lined up which given the context of what he was saying seemed strange.

He’s been named on here but cant remember who it was.
 

Balli001

Well-Known Member
Well if it’s true then why are you so in denial? Hopefully by the end of the window we have got some in but it doesn’t look very positive does it? Teams around us strengthening too
So if we do sign players in this window will you finally post something vaguely positive? Or as i suspect you will just insist they are all shit and we have no ambition?
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
Going to support Doug here actually. Lampard was hired on the understanding he could get more from what we’ve got and so far he hasn’t. Any loan unless it’s followed up with a season long isn’t going to be much use and isn’t going to be the difference between us going down or staying up. Sheaf is back in five weeks or so and there will be a rebuild in the summer.

As a fan I want a loan in, as a pragmatist it’s probably a waste of cash.
that would be cutting off his nose to spite his face
 

SHUNT31

Well-Known Member
l
Was told today of a delay on the Rak Sakyi deal. And no one needs to believe me, dont need any 'heres your agenda'stuff, but again it's down to Doug being funny about loans.....

Outs wise, Hull and Blackburn want BTA but it will be for less than we paid, so it's probably not a goer. Tavares and Collins both have solid L1 interest. Collins will be harder to Shift however as he's sat on a nice contract for the next 18 months.

Lati deal still on
If the loans thing is true, then there’s going to be issues down the line with Lampard etc.

That said, I do think bringing in loans this season is a waste of money. We’re not going to make playoffs and probably won’t get relegated. Think that consolidating this season and going again in the summer would be better but we have to use the loan market next year if we haven’t got a bottomless pit of money.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top