As soon as job came on you could see he was up for it. Sprinted to get the ball off their players and pressing everything
Stacked upfront. Love it
Although I am coming round to idea that Armstrong is too good to lose. We need a nippy striker back up perhaps
Maf best suited to away games possibly
Job have us a calming presence whilst also attacking verywith tenacity. Did great
The point is his energy and industry help fleck and vincelot. Without him they are over run.
Armstrong ends up wandering deep in the middle and looks lost.
When people give ratings they should look at both halves and judge accordingly.
We just will have to go with Murphy as he always seems to be capable of destroying teams at the end.
He created the goals for Armstrong but if jOB hadn't played we'd have lost.
Armstrong was woeful in the first half - the Mowbray interview suggests he was told to start playing like a centre forward.
The double substitution at half time was a no brainer. Mowbray's genius was in keeping Murphy on the pitch when all around, myself included were calling for his head at HT.
A splendid summary. Will be interesting to see who misses out for Cole, as Mowbray said on the radio he will be playing.
He was superb. But just as much as his personal performance the tactical change in formation. From a 442 in which the Peterborough midfield had too much space to what looked him a 4141 with Fleck holding.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
JOB changed the game agreed ..i also think stokes is looking a bit lost without reda .. needs to improve his distribution massively
How can he be lost without a player who couldn't pass a ball out of defence to save his life?
He struggled as we played 4 4 2 which relied on Murphy supporting defensively. Normally he would have JOB as a third midfielder helping.
It's part why Phillips was helped out in the second half as relying on Lameires to cover was absurd. Lameires gave one if the worst performances I've seen by a professional in some time. He was beyond appalling.
The point is his energy and industry help fleck and vincelot. Without him they are over run.
Armstrong ends up wandering deep in the middle and looks lost.
When people give ratings they should look at both halves and judge accordingly.
We just will have to go with Murphy as he always seems to be capable of destroying teams at the end.
He created the goals for Armstrong but if jOB hadn't played we'd have lost.
Stokes was woeful today,appears mowbray agreed.How can he be lost without a player who couldn't pass a ball out of defence to save his life?
He struggled as we played 4 4 2 which relied on Murphy supporting defensively. Normally he would have JOB as a third midfielder helping.
It's part why Phillips was helped out in the second half as relying on Lameires to cover was absurd. Lameires gave one if the worst performances I've seen by a professional in some time. He was beyond appalling.
Stokes was woeful today,appears mowbray agreed.
Stokes was woeful today,appears mowbray agreed.
Pulled him off and rightly so,murphy is left often with too much work to do because stokes never feeds him in the gaps,always looking to go sidewards or backward.Why did he agree? When did he say he was woeful?
No they singled him as the weakness and ruined us first half down the left,murphy wasnt blame free though i admitOddly I thought Stokes was the pick of the back 4 today.
First half he had no support as 'Le Sulk' wasn't to be seen In front of him.
Pulled him off and rightly so,murphy is left often with too much work to do because stokes never feeds him in the gaps,always looking to go sidewards or backward.
So - are you saying every time Mowbray takes a player off that player in mowbrays opinion is woeful?
If stokes starts next game do you think he believed Haynes was even more woeful?
Do you think Mowbray has been wrong to believe stokes is superior to Haynes defensively?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?