The difference is that Hoffman chooses the money-men individually himself. Yes, Ranson found out, to his and our club's detriment, that his investors no longer wanted to back the club in the way planned; but if it were all to go south with Hoffman's consortium I think you'd find Hoffman would be in a better position to find investors than SISU are now.
After all, did they find Hoffman's backers or did he?
He took his time to find backers, after all that was what he was brought onto the board for wasn't it?
Again, do you know who the backers are? Are they individuals, or another hedge fund?
You have no idea, yet, again, you give unquestioning backing.
Quite possibly SISU, God knows i have no love for them, never have done(unlike yourself), didn't want to back Ranson, as his judgement, particularly on chooising managers was shown to be particularly flawed.
They did back him with the purchases of Dann,Fox, Westwood, Eastwood, Gunnarsson and others, however with Coleman in charge actually managed to finish in worse or the same position as before.
Appointing Aidy "No hoofball" Boothroyd hardly improved the position either, and as you and many others kept saying we "had the best squad since relegation", though never seemed able to explain how we didn't get any better.
The lack of progress on the pitch then led to decreasing match-day income, and associated income with that.
He was a failure as a Chairman, which is why he was remeoved, and he didn't exactly leave empty handed did he?