Yes but surely it would be innocent until proven guilty but with him its guilty first?
Yes innocent until proven guilty, however he did it in his workplace, and if I (and most people) was accused of a similar incident in my workplace I would be immediately suspended pending an internal investigation regardless of whether I was innocent or not. Employers have to think about the wider impact of the workforce and impact on the reputation of the organisation when making these decisions, and if something is having an impact on the organisations reputation (like the ongoing media circus) that organisation has a decision to make (regardless of innocent or guilty) while investigations are completed.
In fact if I had been accused of a similar incident that had occurred outside of work, I would still be suspended pending investigation, and if guilty I would be sacked for harming the reputation of my organisation, even if it happened outside works time.
He's lucky he's still allowed to get on and play football (I.e do his job) because us mere mortals would be on gardening leave.
Like I said I would think the same regardless of who had been accused. The accusation itself potential divides the dressing room and also harms the reputation of the England football team. This is why I believe the FA have done the right thing, intact he's lucky that he'll probably still go to Euro's.
It would have been best all round if the case could have been seen before the Euro's so a line could be drawn under this one way or another.