Worse players but a better team. Turner was in both IIRC. I stand by my point that I don’t think Eccles has played in much better teams. Closest was the PO side but that was two PL class players and a bunch making up the numbers with good spirit really.
If true, a big mistakeAccording to Ranson he could have had Warnock but chose Coleman over him.
Mmm, can’t see it. Is making good strides but Premier League level?Eccles is a good championship player and I think will go on to be a solid lower Mid table PL player and if we follow his trajectory as a club he’ll be around for a long time and might become a home town hero
Mmm, can’t see it. Is making good strides but Premier League level?
Only 2 realistically would have a chance in my opinion and that’s Wright and Milan.
Mmm, can’t see it. Is making good strides but Premier League level?
Only 2 realistically would have a chance in my opinion and that’s Wright and Milan.
Don't remind us please, shocking,that was after that Australian trainer was removed,it felt like it was the final V's up to ken et al fucking disastrous!Fuck me, I'd forgot about the Charlton debacle
Dann who went on to CP?That team with a good manager would have been much better but this current team pisses all over it, only improvement would be Fox, Danny and Westwood.
Ranson was an awful chairman.According to Ranson he could have had Warnock but chose Coleman over him.
yes that was feckin dreadful, just showed how much it meant to themFuck me, I'd forgot about the Charlton debacle
Agreed. The idea of signing good, young undervalued talent was great on paper (Westwood, Dann, Fox, Gunnarsson etc). but he couldn't deliver on it.Ranson was an awful chairman.
Agreed. The idea of signing good, young undervalued talent was great on paper (Westwood, Dann, Fox, Gunnarsson etc). but he couldn't deliver on it.
Trusted idiots like Coleman to manage them & then we screwed up on contracts so ended up losing them for less than their true value anyway.
Hmmm, not sure.I'm still convinced that contrary to the rules there was some 3rd party ownership involved in the Fox and Dann deals
We only signed Cody MacDonald after Andy Thorn met him at an Olly Murs gigHmmm, not sure.
What I do know is we kinda stumbled on them by accident. The scout who recommended them we had actually sent to watch Anthony Gerrard.
God he's been around that long?We only signed Cody MacDonald after Andy Thorn met him at an Olly Murs gig
Turned out quite well!Offering a 4 year deal on a player whose started 16 league games is not on the face of it very sensible is it
At least he's over his injuries now, and I was right they did rip it up and give him a better oneI like him, but not a fan of 4 years with his injury record. If he does well it will be ripped up and he'll get a better one, if he remains injury prone we're saddled. With some players I understand the risk of losing good players for free but he's under 24 and we'd get to a tribunal fee at worst case. I'd have certainly kept him for his potential but would have probably given him 2 years with a third in the club's favour.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?