Josh Pask (1 Viewer)

Happy_Martian

Well-Known Member
Interesting if there is any truth in it.

1600348836854.png
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
i seriously doubt it, he's an important part of the squad as he can cover 3 positions.

also who would want to move to swindon

It's just the same old show on my radio
 

Gibbo

Well-Known Member
As everyone seems to think its nonsense, it will probably happen. Judging by comments in the past made by those who have actually seen him play, that might be his level. If I was Pask, at his age, I'd want to play.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Is Eastwooddustman saying that its a RWB coming in, or rather joking about one of the incoming CM's playing RWB?
 

mr_monkey

Well-Known Member
Hmmmm was wondering where he would end up this year after a disappointing loan at Wigan. With Dabo almost back now do we need a RWB?

Absolutely not unless dabo has had a reaction to his injury after playing in the week is going to be out of action for a while
 

mr_monkey

Well-Known Member
Bayliss could easily fit into one of the AM roles or play deeper. I would have him over Shipley in either. It really isn't that an outrageous suggestion.

It really is, why would Preston loan us a player who wouldn't play week in week out when it is what he needs at this stage of his career

He wouldnt start ahead of O'Hare or Allen in cam (and if we need backup to them we have shiperly, hilsner and some youngsters of our own) in CDM he wouldn't start ahead of hamer, Kelly or sheaf

so if you think about it logically it really is nonsense
 

mr_monkey

Well-Known Member
Jesus you're all hard work today. I've given more than enough clues but apparently Sam Mccallum is coming back for the season.
Just realised it should be LWB! sorry

Again, why would Norwich loan us a player who wouldn't start for us when that is what he needs at this stage of development

Giles has looked really good so far and mason is more than an adequate backup
 

GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee

Well-Known Member
It really is, why would Preston loan us a player who wouldn't play week in week out when it is what he needs at this stage of his career

He wouldnt start ahead of O'Hare or Allen in cam (and if we need backup to them we have shiperly, hilsner and some youngsters of our own) in CDM he wouldn't start ahead of hamer, Kelly or sheaf

so if you think about it logically it really is nonsense
From last season, he'd get more minutes on our bench than at Preston. Also was there any mention of a loan. Third, if you're gonna be an arsehole at least learn to spell Shipley's name right.
 

mr_monkey

Well-Known Member
From last season, he'd get more minutes on our bench than at Preston. Also was there any mention of a loan. Third, if you're gonna be an arsehole at least learn to spell Shipley's name right.

I'm an arsehole because I blew your logic out the window, ok mate ;)

Seriously though, are fans of other clubs as obsessed with ex players as ours are as its scary at times
 
  • Poo
Reactions: TTG

GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee

Well-Known Member
I'm an arsehole because I blew your logic out the window, ok mate ;)

Seriously though, are fans of other clubs as obsessed with ex players as ours are as its scary at times
You didn't blow my logic out the window at all. We have 4 central midfield roles. Allen, O'Hare 'Shipperley' are competing for the front two. Sheaf, Hamer and Kelly for the holding two. Having an extra body who is versatile enough to play in both those roles, when a CDM left today isn't 'nonsense'. I have no obsession with ex players, nor have I brought it up before. Someone on here mentioned a young (old) face coming back in. Based on the above I made a guess that it could be Bayliss as he fits those parameters. Do I want Bayliss back? Not particularly. Decent player though and wouldn't say no considering we have 7 players to fill 4 positions. That is literally it.
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
McCallum retuning would make sense after masons shit show the other night wouldn’t surprise me robins has made a move...

If true of course
 

Speedies_Chips

Well-Known Member
From last season, he'd get more minutes on our bench than at Preston. Also was there any mention of a loan. Third, if you're gonna be an arsehole at least learn to spell Shipley's name right.
Robbins really rates Shiperly. He said if he continues to progress he will regarded in the same way that Tommy Hutchinson is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TTG

mr_monkey

Well-Known Member
You didn't blow my logic out the window at all. We have 4 central midfield roles. Allen, O'Hare 'Shipperley' are competing for the front two. Sheaf, Hamer and Kelly for the holding two. Having an extra body who is versatile enough to play in both those roles, when a CDM left today isn't 'nonsense'. I have no obsession with ex players, nor have I brought it up before. Someone on here mentioned a young (old) face coming back in. Based on the above I made a guess that it could be Bayliss as he fits those parameters. Do I want Bayliss back? Not particularly. Decent player though and wouldn't say no considering we have 7 players to fill 4 positions. That is literally it.

You also have hilsner, jobello and a couple of youngsters for the cam roles and no way bayliss could play the cdm role as he can't tackle for shit (even worse that shipererererly) plus pask can play CDM (as he did as a kid at West ham) so that is covered as well

Why would we waste the little money we have on a loan for positions we have covered, it makes no logical sense
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
You also have hilsner, jobello and a couple of youngsters for the cam roles and no way bayliss could play the cdm role as he can't tackle for shit (even worse that shipererererly) plus pask can play CDM (as he did as a kid at West ham) so that is covered as well

Why would we waste the little money we have on a loan for positions we have covered, it makes no logical sense
At least Shipley can track a man Baylis never had the postional awarness for that holding role but was superb if he was in thr AM roles I’m sure.Actuallt excited to see Jobello in one of them roles again my worry is his work off the ball will possibly leave him as an impact sub for a while.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top