stupot07
Well-Known Member
Stu, I'm not pretending for a moment to understand it, but how could that work? If IEC is 70% owned by ACL, and in turn owns the right to all of the F&B etc., then surely ACL gets access to a large proportion of what IEC makes?
If I've read this right, Compass did indeed pay £125m for a ten year deal, but now it all sits in IEC.
http://www.xperiology.com/speaker-preview-striking-the-deal-in-house-or-outsource/
I am genuinely confused. Generally though, if ACL are such a poor investment, why are Wasps looking to buy in?
I think (and don't quote me on this) that as part of the deal compass got the contract for managing events/F&B's so they keep they keep the lionshare of the profit, which makes sense when you consider just c10% profit from F&B's when you consider the prices you're paying. I'll try and find the post.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors