Astute
Well-Known Member
What about the comments against OSB from Rob S?
Grendel and RobS's Conspiracy List
John Mutton
PWKH
Ann Lucas
Joe Elliot
Gary Hoffman
PHIV
Chris West
ACL
Every current member of the Labour Party
Every current Conservative Party councillor
Every person ever employed by the council
70% of SBT posters
90% of CCFC fans
The Sky Blue Trust
The CET
Family members of the above
Have I missed anyone?
What about the comments against OSB from Rob S?
Which ones?
Which ones?
Alleged still working for AEHC/ACL. Bit of handbags is all.
So doesn't he make your list? :thinking about:
Grendel and RobS's Conspiracy List
John Mutton
PWKH
Ann Lucas
Joe Elliot
Gary Hoffman
PHIV
Chris West
ACL
Every current member of the Labour Party
Every current Conservative Party councillor
Every person ever employed by the council
70% of SBT posters
90% of CCFC fans
The Sky Blue Trust
The CET
Family members of the above
OSB
Have I missed anyone?
I think you forgot Andy thorn shhmeee
I thought he was a Sisu co-conspirator, that's why he got us relegated don't you know?
Hence the question really. Only mild snarkiness, I genuinely want to know if people were told stuff that didn't come to pass, or if something came out that was what convinced them.
I thought he was a Sisu co-conspirator, that's why he got us relegated don't you know?
How much would that value go up if the council choose to extend the lease to say 99years for the princely sum of £1.00?
Seems to me the the council are in full control of the value of a company that the Coventry tax payer owns half off. That sounds like a good investment to me on behalf of the Coventry tax payers.
How cynical. I'm sure the taxpayers will all be seeing massive improvements in public services. Solihull eat your heart out - Coventry is the place to be.
I will give you my view, and risk some more camply below the belt insults
In all the clamour for information on meetings with Labovitch, I was keen to keep a silence for this very reason - if he said anything that would come out in the future then, well, it would come out in the future - I have no desire to be somebody's mouthpiece. I still maintain he didn't say anything worth repeating however so... the fact there's nothing particularly exciting in this JR follows my view and lends credence to it, eh?
You could take out of those meetings whatever you want to really... the same as you could with whoever you meet. My own view is there are clearly some major issues that need to be dealt with on the city council side... that doesn't automatically make SISU an innocent naive victim in all this, however! It's hard, very hard, to believe anybody reaches a position of some authority by being naive and innocent, life experience says you need a certain ruthlessness to climb the greasy pole, so claiming you're passive hard done by victims is hard to believe in such circumstances... When it comes down to it however I have a simple motto of distrust everyone
What surprises me more with this, is the Higgs case did get juicy, did offer some issues of concern (talk of media assaults etc.) and based on that, you start thinking this case will be similar, that SISU would use it to hammer home those particular elements which, if played right, could indeed swing public opinion.
Rationally, and now with the benefit of hindsight, it's daft to think that as this is after all procedural, and little but procedural. As such, the wider conspiracy theories don't really belong in a case like this one, do they?
What would be interesting is why two of SISU's arguments were dropped before they even got there. Could indeed be they were baseless, could be they were dropped as part of a deal to be made after the event, could be they'd prejudice the judge against the more serious arguments etc. etc. but, to me, that's the question I'd like answered.
And of course it's the question that never will be answered!
I dunno, I get the impression local government is to The West Wing what Dad's Army is to the SAS.
It certainly attracts some nasty people, but they tend to not be particularly effective, and those that are nasty and effective are also usually doing something else (or Tories)
Edit: @NW
One could of course argue the whole mess we're in suggests nobody has been particularly effective
so a double agent then?
True that. Though to be honest, I still think Lucas has done a good job with a shit situation.
Tomorrow apparantly when the council smash sisu and force them to come crawling back.
Hope I get my seat back.
What about the comments against OSB from Rob S?
It quite possibly makes either approach right or left though
How were they against OSB?
Don't know if you missed it, but there were directly to him in a Reply With Quote. Like I said, just handbags.
Well he accused him of bias. That's legitimate as his posts are. Has he met PWKH? I think so.
Either way OSB is by a country mile the most skilful poster on this forum and I have huge admiration.
That is not sarcastic by the way.
RobS said:OSB: Just to check. Is it ACL you do work for or AEHC?
Well he accused him of bias. That's legitimate as his posts are. Has he met PWKH? I think so.
Either way OSB is by a country mile the most skilful poster on this forum and I have huge admiration.
That is not sarcastic by the way.
Would you sooner ignore and forget it?
Well he accused him of bias. That's legitimate as his posts are. Has he met PWKH? I think so.
Either way OSB is by a country mile the most skilful poster on this forum and I have huge admiration.
That is not sarcastic by the way.
I thought I was your favourite!
You'll never get that clerical role now.
I keep bringing it up? We only found out about it today Ffs.Jesus christ, with you around that's not likely to happen is it? At what point do you move on, you sound like a bit like Labovitch constantly going back over old ground which will never allow us to move forward? Despite all the bad things that have happened to this club you still feel the need to bring it up regardless of the fact that two far lower offers have been made since.
I keep bringing it up? We only found out about it today Ffs.
And it directly relates to the JR, which is why it was mentioned in court today.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I am on about the original rent you keep bringing up and that someone else pulled you about it today too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?