shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Care to elaborate or just run out of actual points and resorted to slinging shit again?
With so called fans like you we deserve all we get.
No commercial revenue because we sold the rights to it. If we want those revenues then SISU need to put their hand in their pocket and pay for it. Oh wait.......
So you admit that we were paying their mortgage and not receiving a penny in commercial revenues?
Doesn't that anger you? Actually stupid question forget it.
With so called fans like you we deserve all we get.
So you admit that we were paying their mortgage and not receiving a penny in commercial revenues?
Doesn't that anger you? Actually stupid question forget it.
says the man helping sh1tsu pay their legal bill by going to sixfields.
says the man helping sh1tsu pay their legal bill by going to sixfields.
Here we go here we go!Can't wait for Grendals input!
I believe he is only going to the Fish concert, not to watch us play.
I believe he is only going to the Fish concert, not to watch us play.
Didn't know Seaworld were taking over Sixfields
Another of those "so called fans", we're a disgrace don't you know?
This is just typical.
The reason I say that this cannot be the perspective of any true football fan is that no true football fan would have any interest but one at the moment - the return to the City.
Why would any fan who has that overriding interest make any defence of ACL or the council.
Someone made some comment on here that if we were Leeds or Millwall then their would be such anger at the club they wouldn't dare move us. This may be, however, such "passion" would also mean not a council house window would be left intact and one if the board members would not be welcomed on a forum such as this.
The initial arrangement was an abomination. The equivalent of offering a dying man a bottle of Evian for his life savings. The attempt at justification shows acceptance of the unacceptable.
Real fans want the club back whatever - not to try and defend the original protagonists in this debacle.
This is just typical.
The reason I say that this cannot be the perspective of any true football fan is that no true football fan would have any interest but one at the moment - the return to the City.
Why would any fan who has that overriding interest make any defence of ACL or the council.
Someone made some comment on here that if we were Leeds or Millwall then their would be such anger at the club they wouldn't dare move us. This may be, however, such "passion" would also mean not a council house window would be left intact and one if the board members would not be welcomed on a forum such as this.
The initial arrangement was an abomination. The equivalent of offering a dying man a bottle of Evian for his life savings. The attempt at justification shows acceptance of the unacceptable.
Real fans want the club back whatever - not to try and defend the original protagonists in this debacle.
This is just typical.
The reason I say that this cannot be the perspective of any true football fan is that no true football fan would have any interest but one at the moment - the return to the City.
Why would any fan who has that overriding interest make any defence of ACL or the council.
Someone made some comment on here that if we were Leeds or Millwall then their would be such anger at the club they wouldn't dare move us. This may be, however, such "passion" would also mean not a council house window would be left intact and one if the board members would not be welcomed on a forum such as this.
The initial arrangement was an abomination. The equivalent of offering a dying man a bottle of Evian for his life savings. The attempt at justification shows acceptance of the unacceptable.
Real fans want the club back whatever - not to try and defend the original protagonists in this debacle.
As I posted yesterday in the new stadium threadThis is just typical.
The reason I say that this cannot be the perspective of any true football fan is that no true football fan would have any interest but one at the moment - the return to the City.
Why would any fan who has that overriding interest make any defence of ACL or the council.
Someone made some comment on here that if we were Leeds or Millwall then their would be such anger at the club they wouldn't dare move us. This may be, however, such "passion" would also mean not a council house window would be left intact and one if the board members would not be welcomed on a forum such as this.
The initial arrangement was an abomination. The equivalent of offering a dying man a bottle of Evian for his life savings. The attempt at justification shows acceptance of the unacceptable.
Real fans want the club back whatever - not to try and defend the original protagonists in this debacle.
Whilst I want the club back in Coventry by any means and that includes a new stadium, I find the timing of this news 'interesting'. Sadly I will remain yet to be convinced that any new stadium is in the works until building works actually start.
This is just typical.
The reason I say that this cannot be the perspective of any true football fan is that no true football fan would have any interest but one at the moment - the return to the City.
Why would any fan who has that overriding interest make any defence of ACL or the council.
Someone made some comment on here that if we were Leeds or Millwall then their would be such anger at the club they wouldn't dare move us. This may be, however, such "passion" would also mean not a council house window would be left intact and one if the board members would not be welcomed on a forum such as this.
The initial arrangement was an abomination. The equivalent of offering a dying man a bottle of Evian for his life savings. The attempt at justification shows acceptance of the unacceptable.
Real fans want the club back whatever - not to try and defend the original protagonists in this debacle.
This is just typical.
The reason I say that this cannot be the perspective of any true football fan is that no true football fan would have any interest but one at the moment - the return to the City.
Why would any fan who has that overriding interest make any defence of ACL or the council.
Someone made some comment on here that if we were Leeds or Millwall then their would be such anger at the club they wouldn't dare move us. This may be, however, such "passion" would also mean not a council house window would be left intact and one if the board members would not be welcomed on a forum such as this.
The initial arrangement was an abomination. The equivalent of offering a dying man a bottle of Evian for his life savings. The attempt at justification shows acceptance of the unacceptable.
Real fans want the club back whatever - not to try and defend the original protagonists in this debacle.
A passionate point of view. But the owners have to have some integrity. Just owning the club doesn't mean they can. ride rough shod over us the supporters and citizens of Coventry. I remember Ransom saying something like we are just the keepers of the flame.
SISU have curled up into the us against the world ball.
They haven't sold their vision to the fans. They have hypocritical policies.
I have said before, SISU convert me...they haven't, ultimately they run the club, very very poorly!
Grendel, you don't necessarily support SISU, but you are ultra critical of ACL and CCC. We can all see it, so why?
The council is about to lend 14m to a local company so they can convert old offices into student rooms, would you call that state aid. The goverment lend money all the time as well as local goverment and it is only state aid if it has not to be paid back. The ACL loan has to be paid back so is not state aid.The negotiations about the rent are irrelevant, their point is that they were due to buy out ACL's mortgage and effectively takeover. The council stopped this by strengthening ACL's position with a state aid.
A passionate point of view. But the owners have to have some integrity. Just owning the club doesn't mean they can. ride rough shod over us the supporters and citizens of Coventry. I remember Ransom saying something like we are just the keepers of the flame.
SISU have curled up into the us against the world ball.
They haven't sold their vision to the fans. They have hypocritical policies.
I have said before, SISU convert me...they haven't, ultimately they run the club, very very poorly!
Grendel, you don't necessarily support SISU, but you are ultra critical of ACL and CCC. We can all see it, so why?
He has made very valid points, knows our history and old players, he is a fan alright. But his hatred of ACL, CCC seems very deep rooted.Grendel has made some very valid points.......No really he has.......I say that only because every village needs an idiot and he is ours!
Grendel has made some very valid points.......No really he has.......I say that only because every village needs an idiot and he is ours!
I wish he'd move to a village then preferably in New Zealand
Would a commercial lender borrow them money in the circumstances? This is the reason why they've had to borrow from the council in the first place isn't it?
Lets just hope that the Judge agrees with you tomorrow morning. I have a feeling that he/she will.No. Because sisu stopped paying the legally agreed rent it put ACL into difficulty with paying their mortgage to YB.
The Council have every right to bale out one of their tenants by offering them a reduced rate mortgage.
No. Because sisu stopped paying the legally agreed rent it put ACL into difficulty with paying their mortgage to YB.
The Council have every right to bale out one of their tenants by offering them a reduced rate mortgage.
ACL are a separate organisation and totally private so we are told.
You are suggesting they are a council quango. I agree with you. It's unethical if not illegal but ethics are hardly a strength of the council are they?
ACL are a separate organisation and totally private so we are told.
You are suggesting they are a council quango. I agree with you. It's unethical if not illegal but ethics are hardly a strength of the council are they?
ACL are a Council tenant. They were put into difficulties by their tenant withholding their legally binding rent. They therefore entered into an arrangement whereby their repayments were reduced in order to "help them out", (which incidentally also enabled them to offer a reduced rent to the same tenants). So what is wrong with that?ACL are a separate organisation and totally private so we are told.
You are suggesting they are a council quango. I agree with you. It's unethical if not illegal but ethics are hardly a strength of the council are they?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?