So move on means stop supporting? or what?
Do you just attend Sixfields to watch football or do you have an interest in items that might see your club disappear?
Your the one saying your Done with the club and others like you have said in the past they will no longer support the club... what do yo mean by that?
Something got under your skin there??
Give it a fucking rest. People are at their wits end about the possibility of not seeing ccfc back in Coventry for years and you're treating it as a joke.
Your the one saying your Done with the club and others like you have said in the past they will no longer support the club... what do yo mean by that?
Something got under your skin there??
You mean a bit like Tim Fisher who said many months ago, 'We have moved on'.:thinking about: Isn't it about time SISU moved on from their obsession with the Ricoh and put all their efforts into this magnificent new ground they have continually promised us.That's not exactly my problem... my problem is certain people come on here and continue to be Done with the club and all that but still refuse to move on
I will always follow the club in some capacity. Season ticket holder over 40 years. I don't do six fields and after the weekend i don't do away games.
In 6 months time I might be just checking the results in the paper, who knows.
What i do know is, is that everyday that Sisu are here, my level of support drops a level.
At some point Sisu will piss you off but in the meantime you watch your football.
It's based on the fact the highest ever ticket revenue was around £5.2 million - I can't remember if that is VAT inclusive but it's an accepted fact, well Astute seems to believe otherwise.
Who pays for this JR anyway?
| Average | total | gate | |
| ground | crowd | turnover | income |
| HR | 16150 | 16445714 | 3978066 |
| HR | 14813 | 14500083 | 3388323 |
| HR | 14816 | 7888438 | 3391876 |
| HR | 16048 | 8685711 | 3992244 |
| R | 21180 | 9925902 | 5391012 |
| R | 20342 | 9666556 | 5311248 |
| R | 19213 | 11089755 | 5738333 |
| R | 17408 | 10854251 | 4945740 |
| R | 17305 | 10954304 | 4360518 |
| R | 16310 | 12059023 | 3925900 |
| R | 10958 | 10825984 | 3550702 |
If it finds the money has been used improperly to the detriment of CCFC, what would the prevailing view be?
total gate ground Ave Crowd turnover income Highfield Rd 16150 16445714 3978066 Highfield Rd 14813 14500083 3388323 Highfield Rd 14816 7888438 3391876 Highfield Rd 16048 8685711 3992244 Ricoh 21180 9925902 5391012 Ricoh 20342 9666556 5311248 Ricoh 19213 11089755 5738333 Ricoh 17408 10854251 4945740 Ricoh 17305 10954304 4360518 Ricoh 16310 12059023 3925900
Can't speak for anyone else but I was actually thinking last night that in my mind that I separate SISU and CCFC off into two different groups. Everything on the pitch players and manager is my club, CCFC and I'm 100% behind them, my nearly 40 years of support hasn't diminished. The other group is SISU and they are not the club, they do not have over a century of history in our great city and have made decisions about our club that make my blood boil - like moving us to Northampton. If it could be 100% proven that the council loan to ACL was done maliciously to cause problems for the club and wasn't done to stabilise the business which the council is a part owner in - then that's bang out of order.
However there's a flipside to that coin and that's the Rent Boycott. It would also have to be 100% proven that the rent boycott wasn't done maliciously to cause problems for the ACL and wasn't done to destabilise the stadium business which SISU obviously have their eyes on.
I guess all this will come out in the judicial review and we'll be at Sixfields for another year at least.
Well that's made things a lot clearer lol
yeah I know :laugh: ................ have tidied it up now .............. not mastered cut n paste on here!
But they will not start the new stadium until this is sorted. They have the excuse they are looking for not to actually do anything.
They will not settle until they get the Ricoh for nothing as Seppalla has already said. This is personal for them.
I don't want to be part of this. The club is finished by this decision.
Well bog off then :wave:
Well that's a mature attitude.
Average total gate ground crowd turnover income HR 16150 16445714 3978066 HR 14813 14500083 3388323 HR 14816 7888438 3391876 HR 16048 8685711 3992244 R 21180 9925902 5391012 R 20342 9666556 5311248 R 19213 11089755 5738333 R 17408 10854251 4945740 R 17305 10954304 4360518 R 16310 12059023 3925900 R 10958 10825984 3550702
Was surprised that they won on all the grounds put forward, expected they might on maybe one ............. but lets be clear what they have won.......... thats the right to have the evidence examined in court supported and put forward by legal counsel. That does not mean they will win, that the council are acting outside of their powers, that loans have to be repaid etc etc ....
My understanding is that the Council have not supplied the Court with detailed evidence to rebutt any of the claims made, and the decision today has been made on the basis that the judge found the SISU barrister's assertions that there may be a case to answer more compelling than the CCC barrister's
As they say every dog has its day in court.
It will drag on for many months yet. That I suspect means that while it is going there will be no chance of a CCFC return to the Ricoh. Will a new site be purchased, maybe but developed ? we will have to wait see. If the new stadium were to be built then wouldnt that render the JR largely pointless. The remedies for a JR of this sort do not include the right to compensation as i understand it - that would require a further action after the JR case finishes it appeals etc. In any case it would be hard to prove great financial loss because the counciltook action because of a delinquent tenant .
What I do not understand ....... from purely a fans point of view ....... how does this benefit the football club, or the fans ............ looks like several more years at Sixfields with the increasing financial pressure that brings in terms of FFP etc. How does that benefit the team or fans?
one last question ........ it has been mentioned by plenty as to who is paying the ACL legals etc ...... but who is going to bare the the costs of the SISU legal actions ..... SISU or CCFC ? (i do not mean who actually pays over the cheque btw)
Well that's a mature attitude.
Is it a bargaining tool? I don't think so personally but who knows?
I must admit from a CCFC perspective I don't see the benefit, aside from a spiritual victory for SISU over the council.
Is it a bargaining tool? I don't think so personally but who knows?
I must admit from a CCFC perspective I don't see the benefit, aside from a spiritual victory for SISU over the council.
Cost of legals can't be ignored!
Less to spend on players!
This is all a delaying tactic by all parties!
Is it a bargaining tool? I don't think so personally but who knows?
I must admit from a CCFC perspective I don't see the benefit, aside from a spiritual victory for SISU over the council.
"If they were to win it" haha
No chance, absolutely none!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?