Yeah, like what NLHW said.
Anyway, if Thorn goes then it will be because SISU don't think he has the nous to stop us from getting relegated. So, we really need EXPERIENCE, which the lack of, is levelled at AT constantly. Carsley has zero experience. You may as well give it to Oggy or me, for that matter.
If AT is going to get sacked at least get someone in who has managed before. It makes me laugh that people attack AT for being a scout and not an experienced manager then say they want Carsley. Makes no sense to me.
The bolded line makes little sense as most cov fans including myself and most others were pleased to see the job go to Thorn after a good start.
I agree Carsley has little experience but I would still rather him than you or Oggy. As he has played over 500 competitive games and played in the modern era up to 2010 and has had some success in a short time at lower levels of football and has been collecting his coaching badges over the last 5 years and has some contacts in the game as shown by effectively getting Gardner on loan earlier in the season. These are 4 aspects that Thorn had none of when he was given the job.
If Thorn were to leave obviously it would not be ideal giving someone the job who has no experience but that is where the club is at, at this moment.
I just don't understand as to why you would be so opposed to Carsley.
@NLHW
I seriously doubt Carsely has learned a lot from Thorn's "mentoring". Maybe he has been teaching Carsley how to play slow, dull and ineffective football? or maybe how to throw away a lead in 30 seconds?
Carsley is his own man with his own opinions and philosophy on football and his own way of management and handling situations, that post makes it sound as if Thorn is moulding Carsley in his own image.