Grendel
Well-Known Member
I'm aiming comments at the level of the audience
You're really hitting the intellectual peaks these days, aren't you?
You have to remember that Grendel doesn't appear to care about the Charity set up to help deprived Coventry children.
Similarly you lie and make up statements to help back your paper-thin arguments. The difference being?
Nah Torchy!....I've got morals, I don't lie, and I don't make up statements. If you're refering to your "Father and car parking"...you DID say it! I'm not trawling through your posts to prove it.
Both you and Grenduffy lack any moral fibre, as I said in my last post to Grenduffy, You don't care about Childrens Charities, and would walk over anyone in your way to get what you want!...But wouldn't pay the "Parking Fee though"
Ooh, I have to say that is pretty desperate. They should have given the money to the "deprived" 8 years ago and not bothered with us. I hope all the people who work for Higgs do it for nothing. After all they wouldn't want to take food from the mouths of those kids, would they?
But. Seriously. That was a ridiculous statement to make.
No but I don't want to stoop to your level.Is that the best you can do as a comeback?
If only that were true.Pathetic - can't really say much else.
Usually investeing in property is a safe bet over a period of time
Actually if you read up on the charity it wasn't just set up to help deprived children but stated within the objects isThe point is that if you asked the deprivied kids if they would rather have a roof over their head (or whatever it is they are deprived of) now...or see the money used as it was - & I am just guessing here - I think they'd say " the roof over my head now".
Such charitable purposes as the trustees may select which shall benefit wholly or mainly the inhabitants of the area within 25miles of Coventry City centre.
And yet another interesting thread turns into a playground argument between the usual suspects, pretty pathetic lads
Actually if you read up on the charity it wasn't just set up to help deprived children but stated within the objects is
Source:http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/Accounts/Ends67/0000509367_ac_20110405_e_c.pdf
They therefore I am assuming they decided that taking on the club's stake in the Arena met that criteria when the trustees were looking at the plight of our club. I have never mentioned any other project or recipient of the charity's funds (apart from the Alan Higgs Centre) because I don't know of any others, so where did this roof come from?
It depends on how serious or immediate the club's debts were at the time. For McGinnity to have wanted to sell the shareholding suggests very, so perhaps they saw it as essential to keeping a major Coventry asset going without the club taking on more debt. The council's quotes of late have defied belief but the charity has been behind the club for a fair while.
How did it end up as who cares most about poor children? Fuck's sake, people.
And yet another interesting thread turns into a playground argument between the usual suspects, pretty pathetic lads
[/B] You've never said anything more relevantointlaugh:
Nah Torchy!....I've got morals, I don't lie, and I don't make up statements.
Do you work for the North Korean media?
I don't think anyone has yet explained the management fee's in detail.
But nobody seem to have any proof the fee's have ever been actually paid, but rather used as a tool to shift assets within the group.
The only thing that gives me any comfort in all this mess is the inevitable outcome: The club and ACL will ultimately be united under the same umbrella and for the first time in almost two decades will find itself on a solid financial foundation.
And it really doesn't matter whoever owns the umbrella.
Actually if you read up on the charity it wasn't just set up to help deprived children but stated within the objects is
Source:http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/Accounts/Ends67/0000509367_ac_20110405_e_c.pdf
They therefore I am assuming they decided that taking on the club's stake in the Arena met that criteria when the trustees were looking at the plight of our club. I have never mentioned any other project or recipient of the charity's funds (apart from the Alan Higgs Centre) because I don't know of any others, so where did this roof come from?
Is that the best you can do as a comeback?
Pathetic - can't really say much else.
I like the irony that James Smith liked this post, and yet he is one it is aimed at.
I can only assume you have Grendel on "ignore" if you didn't think that he was equally culpable.
Its just James 'liked' the post which I found ironic. Grendel didnt.
It seems to me that most 'like' is given to posts containing personal abuse or ridicule.
Sadly that means you can no longer scan a thread to find interesting posts based on the number of 'likes'.
Just to clarify Godiva the abuse was sarcasm
Just to clarify Godiva the abuse was sarcasm
I suspect we will end up with a council owned ground and football club.
The "Keep off the grass" signs will mean we'd have to play elsewhere anyway.
Use a smart phone, you don't see the likes. Knobhead
I can only assume you have Grendel on "ignore" if you didn't think that he was equally culpable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?