Nick
Administrator
Who has taken his word for it???
It will always be cheaper than the Ricoh if you ask TF .
Only an idiot would take his word for it !
Who has taken his word for it???
Every Club pays match day costs it's not exclusive to CCFC. It's going to be very dependant on the facilities of the Stadia, for instance stewarding and policing would obviously be more costly at the Ricoh then at Sixfields per game.
Stewarding and policing is paid by the club anyway
Correct but to my knowledge this is all a part of match day costs.
Stewarding and policing is paid by the club anyway
Every Club pays match day costs it's not exclusive to CCFC. It's going to be very dependant on the facilities of the Stadia, for instance stewarding and policing would obviously be more costly at the Ricoh then at Sixfields per game.
As posted on FB etc
Is no news good news?
● sisu yet to reply kcic's rent offer
● A statement was posted on the CCFC website on Friday but doesn't mention rent. It says: "While Coventry City Football Club acknowledges receipt of a letter, the club wishes to make clear that it is not for sale"
● 88% of people are saying sisu should accept kcic's rent offer, with only 12% saying sisu shouldn't, in a Coventry Telegraph poll
● The Sky Blue Trust has stated it "welcomes any realistic initiative that might get the team back to its rightful home and hope that at the very least this sparks some discussion on the matter. Pick up the phone and start discussions about returning to the Ricoh? Why not?"
● "Ricoh Arena rent deal is an offer too good to turn down" according to Andy Turner
● Thanks to everyone who has sent messages to kcic about this, with a massive majority supporting the rent offer
So fingers crossed for a positive response from sisu soon!
No answers to any of the questions then Michael?
Who has taken his word for it???
People quoting £150k on here in evidence when the only information we have is from TF.
Your buddy Grendel for one.
Didn't Fisher say the rent there included them? No idea if true or it's bull but just think he said that in return to one of the rent offer.
I'm pretty certain Fisher has provided no details about costs and terms of the arrangements at Sixfields.
I'll be interested if you can show me a link to where he said that, or anything revealing any details.
I'm pretty certain Fisher has provided no details about costs and terms of the arrangements at Sixfields.
I'm pretty certain Fisher/Otium etc. has provided no details about costs and terms of the arrangements at Sixfields.
I'll be interested if you can show me a link to where he/anyone said that, or anything revealing any details.
No answers to any of the questions then Michael?
I said that to prove a point you idiot.
Reality is only one question matters at this point - will sisu give an in principle 'yes'? Opinions, comments and double guessing are (and no offence to anyone) in truth irrelevant; the only thing that matters at this stage is sisu's reply. To be fair, the Trust's take on this seems pretty much spot on
I have posted a link?
To a club statement? Could you re-post it, I can't find it anywhere. Cheers.
So you don't have the answers and you just want a reaction from sisu?
So you don't have the answers and you just want a reaction from sisu?
That was ml esque the way you didn't actually answer
I have posted a link?
OK found it now, that covers some of the terms, nothing about costs or whether there is any catering revenue or other revenue, like parking.. TBH I'd have thought if the club provide catering staff then they'd expect a goodly cut (if not all) of the income that generates.. in other words this is a detailed statement that reveals nothing about how good the deal is.
Yes but l would see that as separate as that is arranged away from the land lord isn't it?
Not all match day costs are paid to the landlord, Sisu would have to pay match day costs even if they owned the Arena themselves, it's just a cost that they highlight to make a claim on, I have never thought that the argument of match day costs is relevant in the argument with ACL.
Quick get the outstanding questions police on it. This is exactly the sort of thing that makes their blood boil.
Oh wait it's my mistake. They're sisu's outstanding questions. Nothing to see. Move along. It's all standard business practice. Move along.
It is.if they are paying them to acl isn't it?
Quick get the outstanding questions police on it. This is exactly the sort of thing that makes their blood boil.
Oh wait it's my mistake. They're sisu's outstanding questions. Nothing to see. Move along. It's all standard business practice. Move along.
[/QUOTE]Sorry but he has asked a genuine Question
Why do people think it is ok not to answer questions and then call it normal Business practice?
Then the same people hound another poster/organisation to answer Questions.
They then also accuse others of double standards and of just making up stuff.
Sorry but how do we really take these people seriously.
Yes we all want answers but we are still waiting for answers from 5 years ago so these new ones can wait awhile surly......
QUOTE=covmark;721114]This is a thread about Kcic offer, there's a hundred other threads on sisu, dig one of them out if it's really bothering you that much.
I am really lost nowIt's like me campaigning against murder and then going out and murdering somebody because they did it
I am really lost now
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?