Kevin Webster (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
deanocity3
New Member
just read this 19 charges all in
LastGarrison
Well-Known Member
Hang the c**t.
The Reverend Skyblue
Well-Known Member
I am not keen when everything about the charges are released before it goes to court, just incase they are not true, much like that Lord McAlpine in the Jimmy Saville case, but if true i agree with LastGarrison's punishment.
The Rev
The Rev
kg82
Well-Known Member
I agree rev. Don't see how he can get a fair trial. Like you say, I agree with LG if it's true. It was like that girl who was murdered a couple years ago just before Christmas. The Sun ran a story laying into the landlord of her flat, basically said he was guilty. I said at the time to my girlfriend it was wrong, and there was something strange about the story. Turned out it was actually her dutch boyfriend.
skybluejelly
Well-Known Member
Well I went to Kevin Webster for a mot.. But he said he had a 13 year old escort to sort out first
speedie87
Well-Known Member
Was the Dutch neighbour. The boyfriend had nothing to do with it.
kg82
Well-Known Member
That's right. Knew it was the dutch bloke anyway!
skybluejelly
Well-Known Member
found innocent of all charges
Just shows how the media can have you hung before tried. There will always now be doubt in some peoples mind whatever the verdict which I suppose isn't fair. It has come out though that he's been a complete cheat to his wife who was suffering with breast cancer. As someone said though a weak and stupid idiot but maybe not a child rapist. Question is why was he accused and what happens to the accuser and her mother? Perjury? Surely if it was all lies there has to be some outcome of that?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Nothing happens to them. The trial was a joke how the CPS ever agreed its go ahead ill never know.
LastGarrison
Well-Known Member
In hindsight, I was maybe a tad harsh on the fella.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
I'm pretty sure she was granted lifetime immunity as part of the process.
Looked a very odd decision to prosecute from what has been allowed for public consumption.
deanocity3
New Member
there was no evidence at all against him,no dna,nothing,just her word against his.
and how on earth she can not be named is beyond me as she is now an adult.
and how on earth she can not be named is beyond me as she is now an adult.
skyblueprincess
New Member
Yet another victim in the current witch hunt of Celebrities.
I do however find it funny it was said the alleged victim had nothing to gain by quite literally destroying the life of an innocent man." Really?
Would she not have followed a guilty verdict with a claim for compensation?
Of course she would have.
And who would she have used to fight for that claim?
I do however find it funny it was said the alleged victim had nothing to gain by quite literally destroying the life of an innocent man." Really?
Would she not have followed a guilty verdict with a claim for compensation?
Of course she would have.
And who would she have used to fight for that claim?
Not for the first time on this site you make a confident assertion that is utter nonsense
Complainants do not need and do not get "lifetime immunity" - something which does not exist anyway
No-one in this country can be convicted for any offence unless a jury is sure that they are guilty. May be guilty, might be guilty, possibly guilty or even probably guilty are not enough. If therefore a complainant in a case that resulted in acquittal was prosecuted for perjury and if their jury thought that there was a possibility that they might be telling the truth then they too would be acquitted. Unless new evidence had come to light to prove that they were lying that would almost always be the case. Besides no-one would ever make a complaint if they thought that they themselves would be prosecuted if there was no conviction
Its the same principle that ensures that convicted defendants are not themselves subsequently prosecuted for perjury if they lose their trial
People really should avoid passing off ill-informed opinion as fact on this and any other thread
LastGarrison
Well-Known Member
So in your professional opinion what should happen in cases like this? Surely there must be a way of keeping the defendants name out of the press as this may well have ruined his career.
It does seem grossly unfair if he was innocent of all charges that he is the only one possibly tainted by all of this.
