Simon
They keep saying it is not the club doing this but the owners of the club but then come out with the statement
“This step has been taken as a precautionary measure to safeguard Coventry City FC’s position in relation to the outstanding legal appeal".
As far as I know CCFC is not part of the legal appeal on the JR, Fisher has said it isn't the club doing this, seem to remember Waggott saying the same so what position for CCFC is being protected if it isn't actually involved
Also
"Commercially, it is the right thing to do and is necessary to protect the club’s position as a tenant in Coventry." How does this action do that. Arent the rights of a tenant secured by its agreement with the landlord? Is CCFC actually a tenant with a lease or is it a day renter?
Contradictory statements are surely no longer a surprise to you in this fiasco?
All parties have been guilty of it at various points.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OSB put up questions on here the other day which me and I'd say most fans would like answering. Would it be possible for you to do a open letter article and put the questions across to the owners of CCFC?
no surprise at all but it does give an opportunity to challenge what is being said doesn't it ?
Contradictory statements are surely no longer a surprise to you in this fiasco?
All parties have been guilty of it at various points.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As much as people seem to want there to be a falling out if both Fisher and Eastwood are saying it's not a problem then there's not a problem is there no matter what anyone else thinks?
yes but a good newspaper would point out contradictory statements and statements that are obviously spin rather than printing them without comment and being culpable in their readership being mislead no matter who is making the statements.
See above.
I also don't think you are giving the average reader enough credit.
See above.
I also don't think you are giving the average reader enough credit.
I think you should just point out the contradictory statements from SISU so posters on here can accuse the CET of being a council mouth piece. Wasps have been getting the blame for everything for too long now and its about time the CET took up some of the slack.
Don't cry Toni
According to Wasps chief executive Nick Eastwood.
FYI: http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/wasps-chief-says-sisu-legal-8330161
Simon have you asked CCC. If now that they are no longer an owner of ACL.
Would they welcome and actively help SISU try to build a new stadium within their boundaries. If such land does exist, would they support the concept in order to keep the football club within the local economy?
Simon have you asked CCC. If now that they are no longer an owner of ACL.
Would they welcome and actively help SISU try to build a new stadium within their boundaries. If such land does exist, would they support the concept in order to keep the football club within the local economy?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?