Hasn't Millerchip since sold the lease, so his involvement has gone so it has changed.
It would be down to Jon Sharp now.
Depends on what conditions are on the lease when it was transferred. Look at the conditions that the lease for the AEHC had on it when it changed hands recently.
Hasn't Millerchip since sold the lease, so his involvement has gone so it has changed.
It would be down to Jon Sharp now.
Where, show me? I can't find a story on Google that says that.
I think they'd be well advised to keep out of it 100%
Yeah, where is the story about the sale/transfer of the lease.What, that Millerchip is getting rid of the lease to Sharp?
Yeah, where is the story about the sale/transfer of the lease.
Would be strange for millerchip to try and put conditions on it when selling it.
It was Jon Sharp who was keen on working with CCFC.
He may have been keener on getting the lease. Millerchip might have put a condition on it that Jon Sharp just had to accept if he wanted it.
Why would Millerchip put a condition on it though? Very strange thing to do.
Please don't claim it happened when there is no evidence. Where is the link?Was in the Telegraph wasn't it? Has that not happened then?
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-ground-share-coventry-11915196Please don't claim it happened when there is no evidence. Where is the link?
I have agreed to sell my interest in the Butts to Jon as I think ultimately he and the other directors of the club should determine how they want to develop the land.
Not really. Like i said, look at the AEHC. It happens, and Millerchip sounded about as keen as CRFC letting SISU get a foothold in the BPA as AEHT did in letting SISU getting a foothold in the AEHC. Not saying that is what's happened because I don't know either way, just saying it's possible and an example of how it's possible has very recently been set.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-ground-share-coventry-11915196
Hasn't it happened yet then or has it since been cancelled?
Ha, that was PWKH though.
It would be very strange if Millerchip and should really be questioned why he would.
I couldn't find the link, thank you. It says nothing about CCFC does it, it says 'No comment'.
What I mean by changed is that it was Millerchip running it then, now he has handed it over to Sharp who was keen on working with CCFC before.
The situation had changed from the link as Millerchip is out of the equation and has now said it's up to Sharp.
With confidential terms. I wouldn't hold out any hope that SISU are doing anything Nick, it is all posturing and delaying tactics till the court cases have run their course. Its always 3 years..
Depends if you've got something to sayDamned if they speak , damned if they dont?
Depends on what conditions are on the lease when it was transferred. Look at the conditions that the lease for the AEHC had on it when it changed hands recently.
YepWas in the Telegraph wasn't it? Has that not happened then?
YepWas in the Telegraph wasn't it? Has that not happened then?
Here's one, everybody being asked an agenda or asking should post the last game they went to.
Oh dear, what a response.
Let me ask you a question, what's your expertise in these matters?
Waiting...
No it's irrelevant. There is a clause on the sub lease. Now the lease has transferred it can be changed easily.
The clause related to all football so that will be changed anyway.
And what's yours because you say you're a layperson but talking shite.
I was a building surveyor for 16 years, dabbled in architecture, done quite a bit with building regs and also have a professional qualification structural waterproofing (that's below ground for numpty laypeople) and can say right off the bat that it would be an absolute nightmare and nigh on impossible for something as big as all that. You've got underground waterway's under Coventry, infrastructure and railways to think about and then lets not forget the local residents. Lets not forget what happened in Earlsdon a few years ago and why a very influential area and people in it would be very opposed to something like this. But I suppose that'd give Sisu someone else to blame when no-one believes (apart from RFC) that we will get it when the Observer publishes one shit turbo cad drawing and more wind and piss from that fat lying shit Fisher.
As some have said on this thread, good timing and reasons behind it and with all the lies that oaf has said, I still cannot believe some say he's a decent bloke. I mean in what world do people think that consistently lying (amongst the other shit he's pulled) makes someone a decent bloke.
I hope that answers you Frankley, now you can piss off back to your desk at the Observer as I think your mirror needs polishing
Gosh, what a post.
You're really not a 'gentleman', are you.
What do you mean about the Observer, I don't get it?
Oh... and before I forget, how do you 'dabble' at being an architect? Do you also dabble at being a doctor, does that explain your delusions and Tourettes?
Surveying and achitecture go hand in hand the thick numpty! and the only one with delusions is you my friend!
Do you answer 'The Gentleman's' posts for him, are you related?
Perhaps you should do some research, you can't just call yourself an architect.
You really are a fool.
Do you answer 'The Gentleman's' posts for him, are you related?
Perhaps you should do some research, you can't just call yourself an architect.
You really are a fool.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?