Sisu's new legal challenge over Wasps / Ricoh Arena takeover put on hold by courts
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/sisus-legal-challenge-wasps-ricoh-8495344
To me this just shows that even the legal system is getting thoroughly pissed off with Sisu.
It says it's because the courts want JR #1 settled first.
will be like entering #2 in a situation whereby you've lost the first leg of a two-leg semi-final 7-0.
It's certainly because so much of #2 will overlap with #1. Losing #1, as will surely happen, will be like entering #2 in a situation whereby you've lost the first leg of a two-leg semi-final 7-0.
But there's certainly wisdom in waiting until the existing process has run it's lengthy course
It says it's because the courts want JR #1 settled first.
It's certainly because so much of #2 will overlap with #1. Losing #1, as will surely happen, will be like entering #2 in a situation whereby you've lost the first leg of a two-leg semi-final 7-0.
But there's certainly wisdom in waiting until the existing process has run it's lengthy course
Do you think that means that JR # 2 has no relevance unless JR #1 is successful?
It says it's because the courts want JR #1 settled first.
I was once told that a Police inspector got cut up by a taxi on the way to doing a night shift at the station. That night taxi drivers lives were made a misery and for a few weekends after apparently. I just wonder whether saying the things that were said about the judge and his findings after the JR had rubbed some people up the wrong way. Obviously guess work on my part but human nature and all that...........
I was once told that a Police inspector got cut up by a taxi on the way to doing a night shift at the station. That night taxi drivers lives were made a misery and for a few weekends after apparently. I just wonder whether saying the things that were said about the judge and his findings after the JR had rubbed some people up the wrong way. Obviously guess work on my part but human nature and all that...........
I was once told that a Police inspector got cut up by a taxi on the way to doing a night shift at the station. That night taxi drivers lives were made a misery and for a few weekends after apparently. I just wonder whether saying the things that were said about the judge and his findings after the JR had rubbed some people up the wrong way. Obviously guess work on my part but human nature and all that...........
Are you saying Tim Fisher is now driving a black cab?
Would be a bit silly to start another now to be fair. Let's say the oral hearing succeeds and by some miracle the ACL loan is deemed state aid, where does that even leave Wasps? (anyone?)
seems a sensible thing to happen to me and a course of action that both sides have agreed to
The query I have is now this new action involves Otium does that mean the club (which is Otium trading as CCFC) will be liable for a share of the legal costs of the second action if it fails?
Oh dear! More debt loaded onto the football club. That must load the Club with at least another £30m of debtseems a sensible thing to happen to me and a course of action that both sides have agreed to The query I have is now this new action involves Otium does that mean the club (which is Otium trading as CCFC) will be liable for a share of the legal costs of the second action if it fails?
seems a sensible thing to happen to me and a course of action that both sides have agreed to
The query I have is now this new action involves Otium does that mean the club (which is Otium trading as CCFC) will be liable for a share of the legal costs of the second action if it fails?
which they can pay straight out again towards the tens of millions they are "owed" there is no benefit to ccfc whatever.And a share of the income if it wins.
It says it's because the courts want JR #1 settled first.
The courts believe that this is a new legal action and have put it on hold yet Tim Fisher told the Trust that was not a new legal action but a legal necessity,
"The Trust was in communication with Tim Fisher this morning to get clarity about this matter and he has reassured us that this is not a totally new action but more of a legal necessity concerning the existing JR appeal."
http://www.skybluetrust.co.uk/?start=3
It appears that the Fisher has been misleading in his statements to the Trust as it is a totally new legal action, although not unrelated to an existing appeal.
Didn't fisher say it has nothing to do with CCFC it was a totally separate thing to the football club all this legal action that is going on ??
And a share of the income if it wins.
I'm not sure that the relief claimed is a share in any income.
I don't know what you mean, what relief?
When you go to court you seek "relief", you ask the court to make a ruling. The ruling sought by Sisu is that the loan by the Council is state aid and thereby illegal. I'm not sure there is a compensation claim?
Right, can someone do some sort of flow diagram of court cases (past, present and likely) with potential outcomes please? #confused
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?