Didn't get the answer you wanted first time round, so trying again? The council will be proud! Keep it up Dongo!
Subtle difference but at the moment they are refused to even engage in talks. With what you are proposing they would need to fire up talks again to come to be able to agree a deal and at that point legal action would be dropped.However they are and they are saying no deal can be concluded until the legal action has concluded.
Can't see anyone answering no to that. The club is the priority so if there is a deal that secures the Ricoh and Higgs, which works for the club unlike the old deal, then I wouldn't really care what it meant SISU or any other third party having to agree that.
Saying that I do have a problem in general with someone trying to prevent the legal process run its course but in our situation I'd happily put those concerns to one side.
Subtle difference but at the moment they are refused to even engage in talks. With what you are proposing they would need to fire up talks again to come to be able to agree a deal and at that point legal action would be dropped.
There's no way SISU are going to drop legal action just to have talks that might not lead to anything.
Agree to all of that.
Hope tou are correct Dave Grendel asked for this thread as he felt dropping the legal action in exchange for a suitable long term deal wasn't the way to go.
The legal action is a red herring.
Wasps need to get round the table and negotatiote first, then sisu can decided whether it wants to drop the JR and sign said deal.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
No I just know that legal action isn't a factor and they want the club to sign a deal which is totally unrealistic and until they do they don't want to talk to them.
Keep doing their job on here for them though - I'm sure you will be well rewarded.
The legal action is a red herring.
Wasps need to get round the table and negotatiote first, then sisu can decided whether it wants to drop the JR and sign said deal.
So we should have moved from higgs years ago?I think it's human nature not to want to deal with people who are threatening legal action against you. Put it this way - I own a rental property and if my tenant was threatening to sue me, I would issue a Section 21 notice for them to quit at the end of their tenancy term. Irrespective of the rights or wrongs of the case, it would go to the heart of the agreement and mean I would no longer want them there.
Yeah, but they arent threatening CSF or wasps with legal action....I think it's human nature not to want to deal with people who are threatening legal action against you. Put it this way - I own a rental property and if my tenant was threatening to sue me, I would issue a Section 21 notice for them to quit at the end of their tenancy term. Irrespective of the rights or wrongs of the case, it would go to the heart of the agreement and mean I would no longer want them there.
I think it's human nature not to want to deal with people who are threatening legal action against you. Put it this way - I own a rental property and if my tenant was threatening to sue me, I would issue a Section 21 notice for them to quit at the end of their tenancy term. Irrespective of the rights or wrongs of the case, it would go to the heart of the agreement and mean I would no longer want them there.
So you won't mind exposing them then?
I didn't email them in the end, too pissed off about the academy that the Ricoh deal to me is not as important at this present time.What did Seppala, Anderson and Armstrong say in response to your email?
Expose them with what?
They'd drop I then wasps will offer the deal they've already offered - tell you and the likes of you it was a great deal - you'll swallow their bullshit and do another poll.
So we negotiate a deal
As we sign it we drop the legal action. After this you think they cancel that deal and whip out another one?
Is that what you are trying to say????
I can serve the notice for them to quit at the end of their tenancy, usually 6 months or a year, giving 2 months notice. There does not have to be a reason at all for a S21. It often occurs when an owner sells a property, for instance, and the buyer wants vacant possession. That's what happened when I bought it in January.You couldn't evict them for threatening to sue though could you? Legally I mean? They would have had to stop paying rent? Or along them lines? They would need to have broken terms of the tenancy.
I'm saying the club have been offered a deal. They have been told to not bother coming back unless they agree it.
I didn't email them in the end, too pissed off about the academy that the Ricoh deal to me is not as important at this present time.
They haven't mentioned legal action as an issue for discussing the academy. Wasps and CSF need to outline exactly what they can offer.
I'm saying the club have been offered a deal. They have been told to not bother coming back unless they agree it.
Why are the club and/or Wasps not saying that this is the case, just you?
Well either the legal cases are an issue, in which case why are Wasps worried about them, or they are not an issue, in which case wby are Wasps using them as an excuse?
Why are the club and/or Wasps not saying that this is the case, just you?
Because it would make them look bad? Just a thought.
It would make the club bad to say Wasps have offered them a take it or leave it ultimatum deal?
But surely that's not Wasps' problem, it's the council'sAlso when the council said drop the legal action and we will talk. Lots of people said well they must be worried about it then.
I don't think they were especially when you see the way it turned out. It is just a big hassle initially expensive and in no way conducive to having good negotiations.
The council run everything by legal eagles before doing these deals. Especially the Wasps one in the circumstances.
Even you aren't that stupid surely?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?