Legal action 2 (9 Viewers)

Grendel said:

No I'm not indulging you.

It's a pro wasps stance and I'm not playing.

Click to expand...

Ha ha
Don't forget what's best the club Grendel above all else you don't care about anything else?
So of course with that in mind the answer is yes you would take the deal and ditch legal action that is not relevant to the club.
Pro Wasps stance? By trying to force them into a corner?

Grendel said:

I think PWKH and his personal hate for CCFC needs addressing. Time to do another poll isn't it?

Click to expand...

Don't get too far ahead of yourself you are struggling to answer this one at the moment

Grendel said:

No I'm not at all. I said earlier in the thread why didn't wasps insist on dropping legal action regarding the Academy.

You seemed to be saying it was getting "cringeworthy" - well it is, almost as cringeworthy as when Haskell and Hoffman were playing you on here.

Now Wasps and Higgs are playing you.

It's out in the open now. Yet there's you seriously believing the bull shit these people come up with.

Click to expand...

No the cringeworthy bit was you saying wasps had said there is only one deal to be had. That they have already given us that deal. That there was no negotiations on that deal. It is a take it or leave it deal.
That both sides are lying that negotiations never got that far.
Incase when the club tell us what Wasps are doing, Wasps would then deny it and the club would look bad.
So instead they are both pretending negotiations stopped before a deal was suggested.
That was utter shite and your explanation of it was completely farcical and that was the cringeworthy bit.
So rather than ripping it apart I just left it.