The bit I read was saying he was asking questions about the attacker rather then just asking that as the first question.Yeah. It's a tough one. Not excusing it, but it was 40 years ago.
I admire his honesty in speaking out about it now.
The bit I don't get is that apparently when asking the victim about the attack he asked 'what colour were they?'
Don't get that at all. I would simply be asking what did they look like.
Can't get my head around it on a personal level and I simply couldn't go out looking for any 'group' of people looking for revenge, be it black, Asian, Gypsy, homeless, chav, gay, whatever.The bit I read was saying he was asking questions about the attacker rather then just asking that as the first question.
Surely the fact he realised it was wrong and went and got help is a good example to set? Obviously not the going out looking to kill based on the colour of skin but what happened next in going to the priest etc.
Can't get my head around it on a personal level and I simply couldn't go out looking for any 'group' of people looking for revenge, be it black, Asian, Gypsy, homeless, chav, gay, whatever.
I'm glad he's now supposedly a different person if true.
Listened to it now though, Nick and the conversation went like this.The bit I read was saying he was asking questions about the attacker rather then just asking that as the first question.
Surely the fact he realised it was wrong and went and got help is a good example to set? Obviously not the going out looking to kill based on the colour of skin but what happened next in going to the priest etc.
Bit weird!Listened to it now though, Nick and the conversation went like this.
'She told me she had been raped. I said do you know who it was? She said no. I said what colour were they?'
Very odd sequence of questioning.
I certainly would not be asking what colour the perpetrator was.
I agree with him. John Barnes is brilliant.
but its ok he wont home after a while without bumping into anyone
Eunice Olumide was saying pretty much the same thing as Barns in support of Liam Neeson last night on question time. I’ve not seen the interview in whole myself but prominent and vocal people of colour who have been on the receiving end of racism who have only seem to be supportive of Liam Neeson.
Yes it’s a very sensitive subject and rightly so but it is starting to sound like people have heard a snapshot of what he said without absolutely no context to that snapshot and lost their shit over it. The small part I have seen from his interview some of the people who are going crazy about it aren’t even quoting exactly what he said, they’re eliminating words from what they’ve reported he said and fuelled a fire with misrepresentation.
Having said that not being black myself I don’t see that I have the right to say whether black people should or shouldn’t be offended but the prominent black people who have come out in his defence have articulated why they’re defending him very well.
I know attacking innocent people is wrong. Can i get praised please?Don't think people are giving him any credit for that bit are they? From what I can see is that people are saying he went to seek help because of it and knows how wrong it was when he looks back at it.
I know attacking innocent people is wrong. Can i get praised please?
hes a fucking hero i get itI'm pretty sure it would have been different had he attacked / killed somebody?
The bit people are acknowledging is that he went to get help and knew it was wrong.
hes a fucking hero i get it
i get that but no point people wondering why hes getting flack either. he deserves no praise for realising it was wrong. its in past fine move on. he brought it up not anyone elseNot in the slightest, he was an absolute c**t at that time. He also realises how wrong it was looking back at it (which is the point people like John Barnes are making).