Read the OP.
Their assertion is clearly that its a conscious decision by King which they say he deserves credit for
If you don't think its correct, take it up with them.
The recruitment strategy is to sign the best players available to us, irrespective of whether it’s a loan or not.
Austin was open that the loan market they were operating in was difficult for a variety of reasons. If the official policy was ‘we don’t like loans’ they would’ve just said that and justified it publicly.
Signing Grimes to midfield was probably the best signing we could’ve made and a much stronger addition than almost any realistic loanee on the market.
You need to tell the OP and the people liking their post then!
What do you think posting on the thread is doing?!
You quoted me!!
Spot on, Hull gambled massively last January (getting Carvalho, Giles, Zaaroury all on loan plus permanent transfers) on getting promoted and it backfired with them missing out on the playoffs. Now they're in a relegation battle this season.You only have to look at Hull. Overloaded with loans last season and they very nearly made the play-offs, but now this season they have tanked.
You really are insecure.I was alright with us resigning bright. That trumps Matty James!
I'm just on about the people that constantly have views that are shown up. I just wonder if anyone ever takes a step back and realise they don't know much about football and adjust accordingly and try to improve etc
Why? I can't help that I'm right more often than not. And it does annoy me that people who are wrong so much never seem to learn. When I'm wrong I try to learn the lesson. I think back to the bright thing and see I ignored so many alarm bells and I'll try not to do that again. Same with Marlon king. I was young and didn't care. Now I would.You really are insecure.
Sheaf was a loan originally. Albeit with an option.Oh and Norton Cuffy was good too
Take your point; but I still think a young promising prem RB loan would have benefitted the squad this season.Watching teams with a few loanees, Norwich, Watford, etc struggling to make the playoffs isn't it great that we're making such an effort without a single one?
What happens to the clubs that don't make it and they have to send the players that are not theirs back?
They have to fish around for more loanees as they haven't built a squad deep enough.
Say what you like about Doug King but his stance on loanees is admirable and beneficial to us in the long term
We were rubbish weren’t we? Some went as far as to say the squad needed culling. The manager was struggling and still seems to be. . There was hope that loans may take us to mid table given the season we were having.Just few months ago posters were crying and moaning that we didn't have any loans lol
I wonder if some posters ever stop to think about their track record and how much stuff they get wrong?
Ayari. He’s ours for £20 million.Matty James, mmm, pretty sure I gave it to the owner over that one.
They’ve (Dean Austin and King) said it’s a difficult market because most players you sign on loan, especially from the Prem, expect to play. If they don’t, it impacts the player; parent club and the agent.
The takeaway for me was that if there’s a top player available who would definitely start, such as a Maatsen, Doyle or someone else out there, we will try to sign them.
Who though ?Take your point; but I still think a young promising prem RB loan would have benefitted the squad this season.
No names in mind though, so don’t know what was available?
I said at time the squad is good quality despite poor results.We were rubbish weren’t we? Some went as far as to say the squad needed culling. The manager was struggling and still seems to be. . There was hope that loans may take us to mid table given the season we were having.
So what did King do? Sack the manager, get some coaches in and they inspired the team.
And in Sheaf and Gyokeres neither exploded out of the blocks and were instant hits . Look at the pelters Ayari got because he was so inexperiencedMaatsen, Sheaf and Gyokeres. All loans initially. I think the key to loans is having a buy clause in the loan deal or spotting the talent really early on and making things permanent. However, the no loans strategy under Doug seems to be working now we have steadied the ship under Frank, and Doug seems to find the money when we really need it
The data always suggested the squad was fineI said at time the squad is good quality despite poor results.
It's a tough situation as it's hard to tempt a club to loan us a player who's just going to be cover for Milan and play the odd few games. They want their players to go out and play regularly.Take your point; but I still think a young promising prem RB loan would have benefitted the squad this season.
No names in mind though, so don’t know what was available?
The way Man City are playing at the moment, Pep might want to start playing himSpeaking of, reckon we could get Callum Doyle next season?
Has he progressed since being with us ?Speaking of, reckon we could get Callum Doyle next season?
Think shit owners were the reason sacking a good manager and replacing with a poor one. Their new manager looks good and they will give us a good game soon.You only have to look at Hull. Overloaded with loans last season and they very nearly made the play-offs, but now this season they have tanked.
It's the parent club with the expectation, which is where the issue lies.
I suspect the club got an absolute bollocking off Brighton for the Ayari situation and how they handled him. Not that it was particularly anyone's fault, Ayari just wasn't ready at the time.
But this is where the loan market has become somewhat challenging in recent years, especially when loaning from a PL side. There's an expectation that if you loan a player he'll have a prominent role in the side week in week out bar injury or suspension.
Doubt we got a bollocking do you reckon, probably just lost a bit of respect from them.
We played Ostigard and Gyokeres played a bit while on loan with us, more so after we signed him obviously
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?