Hasn't Doyle played LB/LWB a fair bit too? Gives three options for LWB and LCB positions
I agree, if we get that LWB, then I could see a play off pushStill think I'd prefer a specialist LWB seeing as how reliant we are on WB's to play.
As things stand if a LWB was our last signing and we lost none of our big players I'd be happy with our dealings this summer.
Still think I'd prefer a specialist LWB seeing as how reliant we are on WB's to play.
Don't want to get myself over-excited, but if so we should have a squad that, all being well, should be capable of challenging.I agree, if we get that LWB, then I could see a play off push
Someone who plays there as their preferred position. Doyle and Panzo seem like CB's who can play there if required.How do you class a specialist though?
I can see the lad from Palace getting a call
Bidwell and Kane joined in January which is a difficult time to join a club mid season. You dont have the benefit of a pre season bonding and gelling through friendlies.
Everyone expects players to hit the ground running but they often have lots of relocation and family stuff to sort out.
I thought Kane and Bidwell did okay. But I think they will be even better this season and both bring a lot of experience to the side.
What’s your obsession with tall strikers?I think Bidwell will be the first starter with the notion of Panzo coming in off the bench to use pace and a bit of trickery against tired legs.
That all said, I can’t help but think that JCS and Maatsen we’re good players and we haven’t improved on them last season to this.
Fadz is a year older.
Still think we need a couple of big strong players. One at the back (maybe Doyle but I think we need someone with experience) and a stand in big striker for Gyok (we still have no tall striker for set plays and in play crosses except for Vic).
He wants us to bring Kevin Francis out of retirementWhat’s your obsession with tall strikers?
It's worth revisiting our injury time goals last season... They were not scored through 'sticking it in the mixer'.What’s your obsession with tall strikers?
a stand in big striker for Gyok (we still have no tall striker for set plays and in play crosses except for Vic).
Gyokeres isn’t good in the air, can’t remember him scoring a header. So how would this mythical player be a like for like replacement?
Blackburn homeGyokeres isn’t good in the air, can’t remember him scoring a header. So how would this mythical player be a like for like replacement?
Let me put this another way, for the hard of thinking like yourself:There are one or two then! The Blackpool one hit him in the face iirc, the point still stands a player like Kyle Hudlin as he has been getting at all summer would not be a like for like replacement
Gyokeres simply isn’t just a “big striker”
Dion Dublin.What’s your obsession with tall strikers?
How many times do we lump a high cross in? How effect is that as a tactic when you play possession football when ability on the ball is much more important? How many players with pace to scare defenders and get onto throughballs (which we're much more likely to try) do we have?Let me put this another way, for the hard of thinking like yourself:
Who have we got that can get on the end of a high cross from open play (that means not CD’s from corners and free kicks)?
Go…
We have a variety of players that can play poacher or pressing striker / workhorse / nippy striker.How many times do we lump a high cross in? How effect is that as a tactic when you play possession football when ability on the ball is much more important? How many players with pace to scare defenders and get onto throughballs (which we're much more likely to try) do we have?
You need a range of strikers to offer different problems. The 'big' man, the nippy little striker, the penalty box poacher, the workhorse. And at this moment I think we have, to a certain extent, got that. Big man - Gyok, nippy - Tavares, poacher - Godden, Walker workhorse - Waghorn
The alternative is that we get Godden to grow his quiff and superglue it firm for match days.We have a variety of players that can play poacher or pressing striker / workhorse / nippy striker.
I think we lack a stand in target man.
There’s little point in having players like Gus who can deliver a quality ball high if we can’t nod the odd one in.
We have onrushing midfield of Gus, O’Hare and Allen who are never going to jump high but could easily run in to a nod-down.
In our most successful times we had Cyrille, then Dublin. Times change, I get it but my mere suggestion that we get a back up target man gets ridiculed to the extent that it gets boring.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?